Reciprocal Meat Conference Abstracts

Evaluation of Dietary Supplementation of a Phytogenic Blend and Ractopamine HCl to Growing Pigs on Pork Meat Quality

Authors
  • S. M. Mendoza (BIOMIN America Inc.)
  • I. Mueller (BIOMIN Holding GmbH)
  • E. Hendel (BIOMIN America Inc.)
  • R. Murugesan (BIOMIN America Inc.)
  • G. Gourley (Gourley Research Group)

Abstract

ObjectivesPhytogenics are plant-derived compounds that have biological activity to support animal health and growth. The present experiment aimed to determine the effect of dietary supplementation of a phytogenic feed additive (PFA, Digestarom Finish, BIOMIN America INC.) and ractopamine (Paylean, Elanco Animal Health) to growing pigs on pork meat quality.Materials and MethodsA subset of 90 loins were collected from a performance study. During the performance study (d 0 to 127), pigs (PIC genetics, initial BW = 23.5 ± 1.1 kg) were fed corn-soybean meal-DDGs based diets and had ad libitum access to the diets. Dietary treatments consisted of 1) no feed additive [CON], 2) CON + 0.015% PFA, and 3) 5 ppm Ractopamine HCl from d 98 to 127 [RAC]. Pigs were sent to market at approximately 132 kg of BW. Pigs were stunned using electric shock. Carcasses were deep chilled out and 30 loins/treatment (balanced by gender) were collected and aged for 10 d before evaluation at the Iowa State University Sensory Center. Loins were assessed for purge, visual color score (1 to 6, light to dark), visual marbling, ultimate pH, reflectance, cook loss, instrumental force, and sensory attributes (1 to 10, juiciness, tenderness, chewiness, flavor, and off-flavor). Data were analyzed using Mixed procedure of SAS (SAS Inst. Inc., Cary, NC) to determine the effect of diet and gender (the interaction was not significant). Differences between least square means were determined using the t test and significance was defined as having a p-value ≤ 0.05.ResultsRAC increased the weight of loin and ultimate pH compared to PFA and control (Table 1). PFA reduced cook loss compared to control but was not different from RAC. PFA increased flavor attributes compared to RAC but was not different from control. Loins from males reported greater marbling fat, juiciness, and tenderness and lower weight loin, cook loss, and chewiness compared to loins from females. Weight of the loin, juiciness and tenderness were numerically increased by PFA and chewiness and instrumental force were numerically reduced by PFA.Table 1Effect of dietary supplementation of a Phytogenic feed additive and Ractopamine HCl to growing pigs on pork meat qualityItemControlPFA1RAC2Diet SEMFemaleMaleGender SEMWeight of loin, g4532b4679b4910a73.434855x4559y59.98Purge, %1.781.841.530.1771.791.650.145Visual color, score2.592.772.850.1092.6442.8300.089Marbling fat, %1.801.661.580.1061.489y1.865x0.087Ultimate pH5.725b5.749b5.831a0.0155.7575.7790.012Reflectance, L*value50.2349.8549.230.44749.8349.720.365Cook loss, %22.88a21.43b22.08ab0.46722.75x21.51y0.382Juiciness4.915.395.120.2614.71y5.57x0.213Tenderness5.025.194.990.3044.44y5.69x5.85Chewiness6.335.856.050.3326.64x5.51y0.271Flavor3.18ab3.67a3.01b0.1853.153.430.151Off-flavor2.381.992.310.3122.332.120.255Instrumental force, kg6.806.556.960.1836.976.580.149abValues in the same row show statistically difference among diets (P ≤ 0.05) as determined using the student t test.xyValues in the same row show statistically difference between genders (P ≤ 0.05) as determined using the student t test.1PFA, Digestarom Finish in the diets of pigs at 0.015% from d 0 to 127.2RAC, Paylean in the diets of pigs at 5 ppm Ractopamine HCl from d 98 to 127.ConclusionData suggest that diet can affect meat sensory attributes and more research is required to understand the benefits of phytogenic compounds on pork meat quality.

Keywords: ractopamine, phytogenic, pork meat quality, flavor

How to Cite:

Mendoza, S. M., Mueller, I., Hendel, E., Murugesan, R. & Gourley, G., (2018) “Evaluation of Dietary Supplementation of a Phytogenic Blend and Ractopamine HCl to Growing Pigs on Pork Meat Quality”, Meat and Muscle Biology 2(2). doi: https://doi.org/10.221751/rmc2018.105

340 Views

249 Downloads

Published on
31 Mar 2018
Peer Reviewed