Optimisation of genomic selection for harvest traits of Malabar red snapper (Lutjanus malabaricus)
- Bing Liang (Singapore Food Agency)
- Dean R. Jerry (James Cook University)
- Hu Nguyen (James Cook University)
- Purushothaman Kathiresan (James Cook University)
- David B. Jones (James Cook University)
- Xueyan Shen (James Cook University)
- Joyce Koh (James Cook University)
- Celestine Terence (James Cook University)
- Maria Nayfa (James Cook University)
- Maura Carrai (James Cook University)
- Rachel Ho (James Cook University)
- Hazim Mohamed (James Cook University)
- Saraphina Tneo (James Cook University)
- Grace Loo (Republic Polytechnics)
- Shubha Vij (Republic Polytechnics)
- Jose Domingos (James Cook University)
Abstract
Traditional pedigree-based breeding in aquaculture is slow and resource-intensive, whereas genomic selection uses SNPs to estimate GEBVs more efficiently. This study optimized genomic selection for Malabar red snapper (Lutjanus malabaricus), a commonly farmed fish in Southeast Asia, by evaluating three parametric models: GBLUP, BayesR (a Bayesian mixture model), and KAML (kinship-adjusted multiple-loci linear mixed model). These models were assessed across a range of SNP densities (500 to 56,378) and training population sizes (80 to 2,038). A total of 2,547 individuals from three rearing sites were genotyped using a 70k SNP array, assessing five traits: body weight (BW), total length (TL), body depth (BD), Fulton's condition factor (K), and body shape index (BSI). Prediction accuracy was evaluated through five-fold cross-validation with 10 replicates. Results showed similar performance across models for growth traits (BW, TL, and BD), with accuracies between 0.4 and 0.6. BayesR excelled in ratio traits, reaching 0.76 for K and 0.74 for BSI, likely because body shape traits are controlled by many small-effect loci alongside a few moderate-to-large QTLs. Its mixture-model framework effectively captures this range of SNP effects, leading to improved predictive performance. Correlation analysis revealed strong alignment between GBLUP and KAML (≥0.95), while BayesR correlated highly with GBLUP and KAML for BW and BD ( >0.93) but moderately for TL and BSI (0.54-0.74) and showed no significant correlation for K. Prediction accuracy improved with larger training populations and higher SNP densities, reaching plateau at 5,000 SNPs and 1,200 individuals for growth traits. Additionally, top-ranked SNP subsets based on GWAS for BW outperformed random subsets in EBV prediction for BW, TL, and BD, but not for K and BSI. This suggests that targeted SNP selection is trait-specific and shows limited compatibility with unrelated traits. Consequently, a balanced approach using 5,000 SNPs and a training population of 1,200 individuals was found to be the most cost-effective for GS predictions in Malabar red snapper.In a complementary study, in-silico pooled DNA genotyping was tested for progeny testing and genomic selection. Simulated mass spawning produced genotypes and phenotypes for parents and offspring. Offspring with similar phenotypes were grouped into bands and genotyped by pool, and SNP allele frequencies were used to estimate parental contributions. Assignment accuracy was above 99% with a minimum of 63 SNPs for 64 families. The approach also accurately estimated parental breeding values with 99% accuracy by genotyping only 10 pools instead of 1,200 individual offspring, reducing costs 120-fold. This method can aid in genetic diversity analysis of the pool by assessing the proportional contributions of each sire and dam, offering valuable insights for offspring selection. In summary, this approach holds significant potential for reducing costs in the real-world genomic selection of both parents and offspring.
Keywords: 2026
How to Cite:
Liang, B., Jerry, D., Nguyen, H., Kathiresan, P., Jones, D., Shen, X., Koh, J., Terence, C., Nayfa, M., Carrai, M., Ho, R., Mohamed, H., Tneo, S., Loo, G., Vij, S. & Domingos, J., (2026) “Optimisation of genomic selection for harvest traits of Malabar red snapper (Lutjanus malabaricus)”, World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production Digital Archive 2026(1): 2282854. doi: https://doi.org/10.31274/wcgalp.23471
Rights: 1
Downloads:
Download PDF
View PDF
63 Views
14 Downloads