Presentation
Author: Ettien Koffi (St. Cloud State University)
The voiced interdental non-sibilant fricative [ð] produced by 10 native speakers of General American English (GAE) and 67 non-native speakers of English is analyzed quantitatively and acoustically. The quantitative data shows that GAE talkers produced [ð] accurately 88.09% of the time, substituted it with [d̪] 2.38%, and with [n̪] 9.52%. L2 talkers pronounced it accurately 47.51% of the time, substituted it with [d̪] 44.27%, with [z] 4.22%, with [s] 1.74%%, with [ɾ] 1.4%, and with [θ] .99%. A closer scrutiny of the distributional patterns reveals that all the substitutions occurred only in syllable onsets, but not intervocalically. An acoustic phonetic analysis indicates that [d̪] is by far the preferred substitute for [ð] because their intensities are perceptually indistinguishable. A relative functional load (RFL) analysis is done also to gauge the likelihood of unintelligibility if/when [ð] is replaced by [d̪], [z], or [v].
Keywords:
How to Cite: Koffi, E. (2015) “The Acoustic Phonetics of Voiced Th in Seven Varieties of L2- Accented English: Focus on Intelligibility”, Pronunciation in Second Language Learning and Teaching Proceedings. 7(1).