Reciprocal Meat Conference Abstracts

Time-Temperature Relationships for Sanitizing Meat Processing Equipment

Authors
  • L. Dillard (West Texas A&M University)
  • R. Herrick (West Texas A&M University)
  • T. Lawrence (West Texas A&M University)

Abstract

ObjectivesThe current method for in-line sanitation of most meat processing equipment is a brief submersion in hot (> 82°C) water. However, there is no industry or government standard for the time the equipment must remain submerged to be properly sanitized. Previous research has shown this method to be ineffective in killing bacteria on knife surfaces, due to the duration of time the knife was allowed to remain submersed in water. Personal, in-facility observations by the authors, of workers submersing equipment for variable lengths of time led to the hypothesis that differences in equipment mass may warrant differences in dwell time during submersion. Thus, the objective of this research was to develop time-temperature curves for typical red meat slaughter equipment.Materials and MethodsEquipment tested is common to commercial animal harvest facilities and included a shroud pin (16.0g), boning hook (66.9g), lymph node hook (94.1g), lamb skinning knife (99.2g), boning knife (106.2g), beef skinning knife (112.0g), honing steel (249.6g), cleaver (377.0g), weasand rod (490 g), beef trolley hook (525 g), pork gambrel (1,100 g), and pneumatic de-hider (1,345 g) ranged widely in mass. One thermocouple was attached to the surface of each piece of equipment and another was submerged in the water bath. A thermocouple data acquisition module recorded temperature change of the equipment and the water bath each 15 ms during submersion. Time-temperature change data was collected for each piece of equipment submerged in 81, 87, and 95°C water. Logarithmic curves were fitted to each piece of equipment at each sanitation temperature.ResultsGeometric mean (± SEM) dwell times for all equipment to reach 71°C were 9.668 (± 4.603), 5.841 (± 2.545), and 1.614 (± 1.078) seconds in 81, 87, and 95°C water. These results suggest that while the current method of sanitation may be feasible for smaller equipment such as knives, larger equipment with greater mass is unlikely to reach a temperature adequate for sanitation in the time (< 10 s) allowed between carcasses at many commercial processors, thus increasing the potential for cross-contamination between carcasses.ConclusionIn conclusion, these results suggest that equipment sanitation at some points of process may be improved by equipment operators having access to multiple pieces of equipment which can individually be submerged in hot water to achieve dwell times sufficient for surface sanitation.

Keywords: equipment, hot, sanitation, slaughter, water

How to Cite:

Dillard, L., Herrick, R. & Lawrence, T., (2018) “Time-Temperature Relationships for Sanitizing Meat Processing Equipment”, Meat and Muscle Biology 1(2). doi: https://doi.org/10.221751/rmc2016.159

403 Views

262 Downloads

Published on
31 Aug 2018
Peer Reviewed