Reciprocal Meat Conference Abstracts
Authors: A. N. Orange (Texas Tech University) , M. M. Brashears (Texas Tech University) , M. F. Miller (Texas Tech University) , A. Echeverry (Texas Tech University)
ObjectivesSalmonella continues to be a leading cause of morbidity due to foodborne illness in the United States, accounting for 11% of the total annual foodborne illness cases (> 1 million). Pork is known to carry Salmonella, and it is critical that interventions be validated in simulated industry settings to demonstrate effective reductions of this pathogen. The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy of various FSIS approved interventions on the reduction of Salmonella on post-harvest chilled pork head meat.Materials and MethodsFresh pork cheek meat, that was chilled to 4°C, was inoculated with a 5-strain cocktail of Rifampicin Resistant Salmonella strains (S. Newport T1–473, S. Typhimurium R1–089, S. Enteritidis T1–496, S. Montevideo 11TTU382B, and S. Anatum 11TTU158B). Pork samples were dipped into a Salmonella solution of approximately 7.00 Log10 CFU/ml for a final inoculated concentration of nearly 5.00 Log10 CFU/cm2 on the pork surfaces. Interventions tested in this study included: 1) Sulfuric acid and sodium sulfate (pH 1.3), 2) Peracetic acid (350 ppm), 3) Lactic acid (3%), 4) Citric acid (1.3%), 5) Hypobromous acid (300 ppm), 6) Lauramide arginine ethyl ester (200 ppm), 7) Peracetic acid (400 ppm) with 2% acetic acid, and 8) Sulfuric acid and sodium sulfate (pH 1.3) combined with peracetic acid (350 ppm). Treatments were prepared according to manufacturers’ recommendations to desired concentrations and confirmed using a pH meter, chemical titration and test kits specified for each intervention prior to treatment of the pork meat. A commercial CHAD cabinet (CHAD Equipment LLC., Olathe, KS., United Sates) was used to apply individual treatments at ambient temperature (21°C) at a speed of 30.5 cm/2.5 sec at a pressure of 275.8 kPa. Salmonella on the pork was enumerated before treatments, and 5 min and 24 h after treatment. Salmonella was enumerated on Tryptic Soy Agar modified to have a concentration of 100 mcg/mL of rifampicin within agar solution. Each experiment was replicated 3 times and statistically analyzed using ANOVA and pairwise t tests.ResultsA P-value of 0.1 was used to determine significance during statisitical analysis. Five-min post treatment Salmonella reductions showed significant reduction with the application of sulfuric acid and sodium sulfate combined with peracetic acid with a 1.71 Log10 CFU/cm2 reduction (P = 0.07). After 24 H post treatment showed significant Salmonella reductions with sulfuric acid and sodium sulfate combined with peracetic acid (3.98 Log10 CFU/cm2 reduction; P < 0.001), peracetic acid (3.43 Log10 CFU/cm2 reduction; P < 0.001), lactic acid (3.06 Log10 CFU/cm2 reduction; P < 0.001), sulfuric acid and sodium sulfate (2.83 Log10 CFU/cm2 reduction; P < 0.001), water (2.06 Log10 CFU/cm2 reduction; P < 0.001), lauramide arginine ethyl ester (1.71 Log10 CFU/cm2 reduction; P < 0.001), hypobromous acid (1.69 Log10 CFU/cm2 reduction; P < 0.001), and citric acid (1.64 Log10 CFU/cm2 reduction; P < 0.001).ConclusionIt is pivotal for the industry to validate the efficacy of antimicrobial interventions in an industry setting to demonstrate their effectiveness. The results of this study indicate that the application of sulfuric acid and sodium sulfate combined with peracetic acid reduce Salmonella significantly in chilled pork and could improve the safety of pork products.
Keywords: salmonella, organic acids, pork, intervention
How to Cite:
Orange A. N. & Brashears M. M. & Miller M. F. & Echeverry A., (2018) “Reduction of Salmonella in Post-Harvest Chilled Pork Head Meat Using Multiple Interventions”, Meat and Muscle Biology 2(2). doi: https://doi.org/10.221751/rmc2018.114