<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="2.3" xml:lang="EN" annotation-version="1.0"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="hwp">mmb</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">mmb</journal-id><journal-title>Meat and Muscle Biology</journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="full">MMB</abbrev-journal-title><issn pub-type="epub">2575-985X</issn><publisher><publisher-name>American Meat Science Association</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">rmc2017.160</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.221751/rmc2017.160</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>2017 Reciprocal Meat Conference – Undergraduate Research Competition</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Effects of Nitrite Source, Reducing Agents, and Holding Time on Color Development in a Cured Meat Model System</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" contact-id="0" contact-type="auto"><name><surname>Posthuma</surname><given-names>J. A.</given-names></name><aff>Department of Animal Science, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, USA</aff></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" contact-id="0" contact-type="auto"><name><surname>Rasmussen</surname><given-names>F. D.</given-names></name><aff>Department of Animal Science, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, USA</aff></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" contact-id="0" contact-type="auto"><name><surname>Sullivan</surname><given-names>G. A.</given-names></name><aff>Department of Animal Science, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, USA</aff></contrib></contrib-group><pub-date pub-type="ppub"><month>01</month><year>2019</year></pub-date><volume>1</volume><issue>3</issue><fpage>165</fpage><lpage>165</lpage><permissions><copyright-year>2019</copyright-year><copyright-holder>American Meat Science Association</copyright-holder><license license-type="open-access"><p>This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC-ND license (<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/</ext-link>)</p></license></permissions><abstract><sec><title>Objectives</title><p>The objective of this study was to determine the effects of nitrite source, the addition of reducing agents, and holding times prior to cooking on color development in a cured meat model system.</p></sec><sec><title>Materials and Methods</title><p>Emulsified beef sausages were manufactured using 4 different combinations of nitrite sources and reducing agents: 1) sodium nitrite (SN; 156 ppm), 2) SN (156 ppm) and sodium erythorbate (SE; 495 ppm), 3) pre-converted celery juice powder (CJP; VegStable 504, Florida Food Products, Inc., Eustis, FL; providing 100 ppm of sodium nitrite), 4) CJP (providing 100 ppm of nitrite) and cherry powder (CP; VegStable 515, Florida Food Products, Inc., Eustis, FL; providing 440 ppm ascorbic acid). Beef, ice (20%), salt (2%) and the appropriate amount of sodium nitrite and reducing agents were chopped for 1 min in a food processor at 2000 rpm (Blixer 6V, Robot Coupe, Robot Coupe, Ridgeland, MS). For each treatment, the meat batter was placed in 5, 100 mL beakers, and held at 21°C for 5, 15, 30, 60, and 120 min prior to cooking. The emulsions were cooked in a water bath for 30 min at 40°C and 30 min at 80°C and then cooled for 30 min in an ice bath. Samples were then evaluated for objective color (Minolta CR400; L*, a*, b*), residual nitrite, total meat pigment, and cured meat pigment. Three independent replications were produced. Data were analyzed using the GLIMMIX procedure of SAS (SAS Inst. Inc., Cary, NC) using a 2 × 2 × 5 factorial arrangements with main effects of nitrite source, with or without reducing agents and holding time and their interactions. Means were separated using Tukey’s adjustment (<italic>P</italic> ≤ 0.05).</p></sec><sec><title>Results</title><p>A significant nitrite source by reducing agent interaction was identified for cured meat pigment and residual nitrite (<italic>P</italic> ≤ 0.006). The SN+SE samples had the greatest amount of cured meat pigment (130.9 ppm) followed by CJP+CH (127.8 ppm), SN (74.7 ppm), and CJP (51.9 ppm) where each treatment was different than all other treatments. Residual nitrite was greatest in SN (79.7 ppm), SN+SE (62.6 ppm) and CJP (59.3 ppm) were intermediate and similar, and CJP+CH (31.64 ppm) had the least. Treatments with reducing compounds (SE or CP) were more red (<italic>P</italic> &lt; 0.001; a* 15.8) and less yellow (<italic>P</italic> = 0.016; b* 8.8) than those without reducing compounds (a*10.7; b* 9.2). Similarly, samples cured with SN were more red (<italic>P</italic> &lt; 0.001; a* 13.9) and less yellow (<italic>P</italic> = 0.009; b* 8.8) than those cured with CJP (a* 12.6; b* 9.2) but the differences were not as great the effect of reducing agents. Total meat pigment (<italic>P</italic> &gt; 0.06) and L* (<italic>P</italic> &gt; 0.32) were not affected by nitrite source or reducing agents. Holding time was not included in any significant interactions (<italic>P</italic> &gt; .349). The only significant main effect of holding time was for a* (<italic>P</italic> = 0.011) where sausages held for 120 min was more red than those held for 5, 15, and 30 min.</p></sec><sec><title>Conclusion</title><p>The addition of reducing agents (SE or CP) had the largest impact on cured meat color development and reduced the residual nitrite in a cured meat model system. Treatments with SN had slightly greater cured color development than CPJ treatments. Holding times prior to cooking had limited impact on cured meat color development.</p></sec></abstract><kwd-group><title>Keywords: </title><kwd>alternative curing</kwd><kwd>cured color development</kwd><kwd>holding times</kwd><kwd>reducing agents</kwd><kwd>Sodium nitrite</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta><custom-meta-wrap><custom-meta><meta-name>author</meta-name><meta-value>Posthuma J. A.</meta-value></custom-meta><custom-meta><meta-name>author</meta-name><meta-value>Rasmussen F. D.</meta-value></custom-meta><custom-meta><meta-name>author</meta-name><meta-value>Sullivan G. A.</meta-value></custom-meta></custom-meta-wrap><ar:concepts xmlns:ar="http://appliedrelevance.com"><ar:concept><ar:id>a06e2d2a6164447fcb3aca27b61afd34</ar:id><ar:name>ppm</ar:name><ar:path a="a">Soils|Miscellaneous|ppm</ar:path><ar:taxonomy>Soils</ar:taxonomy></ar:concept></ar:concepts></front><custom-meta-container><journal-date-data><jdate>2019-02-01</jdate></journal-date-data><journal-year>2019</journal-year><journal-month>01</journal-month><journal-title>Meat and Muscle Biology</journal-title><journal-issue>3</journal-issue><journal-fpage>165</journal-fpage><journal-volume>1</journal-volume><journal-lpage>165</journal-lpage><insert-date>February 1, 2019</insert-date></custom-meta-container></article>
