<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="2.3" xml:lang="EN" annotation-version="1.0"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="hwp">mmb</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">mmb</journal-id><journal-title>Meat and Muscle Biology</journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="full">MMB</abbrev-journal-title><issn pub-type="epub">2575-985X</issn><publisher><publisher-name>American Meat Science Association</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">rmc2016.117</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.221751/rmc2016.117</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>2016 Reciprocal Meat Conference – Meat and Poultry Safety</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Presence of Salmonella on Pork Carcasses at Different Time-Points during Harvest in The Bahamas</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" contact-id="15057743588546832044" contact-type="auto"><name><surname>Hanlon</surname><given-names>K. E.</given-names></name><aff>Department of Animal and Food Sciences, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX, USA</aff></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" contact-id="11928184478183999859" contact-type="auto"><name><surname>Miller</surname><given-names>M. F.</given-names></name><aff>Department of Animal and Food Sciences, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX, USA</aff></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" contact-id="1296035091196069718" contact-type="auto"><name><surname>Brashears</surname><given-names>M. M.</given-names></name><aff>Department of Animal and Food Sciences, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX, USA</aff></contrib></contrib-group><pub-date pub-type="ppub"><month>09</month><year>2018</year></pub-date><volume>1</volume><issue>2</issue><fpage>121</fpage><lpage>121</lpage><permissions><copyright-year>2018</copyright-year><copyright-holder>American Meat Science Association</copyright-holder><license license-type="open-access"><p>This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC-ND license (<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/</ext-link>)</p></license></permissions><abstract><sec><title>Objectives</title><p>To determine the presence of <italic>Salmonella</italic> on pork carcasses at 3 different processing points during harvest in a commercial abattoir in the Bahamas.</p></sec><sec><title>Materials and Methods</title><p>A total of 44 carcasses were sampled between December 2015 and January 2016 at an abattoir in Nassau, Bahamas. Pork carcasses were sampled using sterile swabs pre-enriched with Buffered Peptone Water (BPW) at 3 steps during the harvest process: post-exsanguination, post-scalding (but before singeing), and on entering the cooler. Each targeted harvest step was represented by a composite swab sample of 100 cm<sup>2</sup> that included the ham, belly, and jowl of each carcass. All swabs were transported back to Lubbock, Texas where they were analyzed for <italic>Salmonella</italic> using a commercial real-time PCR assay. All presumptive positive samples were subjected to culture and serological confirmation. A Chi-square analysis was performed via PROC FREQ on SAS (version 9.4; SAS Inst. Inc., Cary, NC) to compare the frequency of <italic>Salmonella</italic> by harvest step. Significance was detected at <italic>P</italic> ≤ 0.05.</p></sec><sec><title>Results</title><p><italic>Salmonella</italic> was significantly reduced from 34.1% (15/44) at post-exsanguination to 4.6% (2/44) after scalding and ultimately to 2.3% (1/44) at cooler ready (<italic>P</italic> &lt; 0.0001).</p></sec><sec><title>Conclusion</title><p>Our data indicate that process control during harvest managed to significantly reduce the presence of <italic>Salmonella</italic> on the surface of pork carcasses. This information can be used to better understand the frequency of <italic>Salmonella</italic> in pork and develop methods to further manage <italic>Salmonella</italic> on final pork carcasses through the harvest practices used in the Bahamas.</p></sec></abstract><kwd-group><title>Keywords: </title><kwd>carcass sampling</kwd><kwd>pork</kwd><kwd>Salmonella</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta><custom-meta-wrap><custom-meta><meta-name>author</meta-name><meta-value>Hanlon K. E.</meta-value></custom-meta><custom-meta><meta-name>author</meta-name><meta-value>Miller M. F.</meta-value></custom-meta><custom-meta><meta-name>author</meta-name><meta-value>Brashears M. M.</meta-value></custom-meta></custom-meta-wrap><ar:concepts xmlns:ar="http://appliedrelevance.com"/></front><custom-meta-container><journal-date-data><jdate>2018-09-13</jdate></journal-date-data><journal-year>2018</journal-year><journal-month>09</journal-month><journal-title>Meat and Muscle Biology</journal-title><journal-issue>2</journal-issue><journal-fpage>121</journal-fpage><journal-volume>1</journal-volume><journal-lpage>121</journal-lpage><insert-date>September 13, 2018</insert-date></custom-meta-container></article>
