<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="2.3" xml:lang="EN" annotation-version="1.0"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="hwp">mmb</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">mmb</journal-id><journal-title>Meat and Muscle Biology</journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="full">MMB</abbrev-journal-title><issn pub-type="epub">2575-985X</issn><publisher><publisher-name>American Meat Science Association</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">rmc2016.075</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.221751/rmc2016.075</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>2016 Reciprocal Meat Conference – Meat and Poultry Quality</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Quality Attributes during 160 Days Refrigerated Shelf Life of a Smoked, Fully Cooked Sausage Formulated With a Nitrite Containing Pork Preblend</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" contact-id="0" contact-type="auto"><name><surname>Collins</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><aff><label>1</label>Animal Sciences &amp; Industry, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KY, USA</aff></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" contact-id="0" contact-type="auto"><name><surname>Boyle</surname><given-names>E.</given-names></name><aff><label>1</label>Animal Sciences &amp; Industry, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KY, USA</aff></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" contact-id="0" contact-type="auto"><name><surname>O’Quinn</surname><given-names>T.</given-names></name><aff><label>1</label>Animal Sciences &amp; Industry, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KY, USA</aff></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" contact-id="0" contact-type="auto"><name><surname>Houser</surname><given-names>T.</given-names></name><aff><label>1</label>Animal Sciences &amp; Industry, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KY, USA</aff></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" contact-id="0" contact-type="auto"><name><surname>Vahl</surname><given-names>C.</given-names></name><aff><label>2</label>Statistics, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KY, USA</aff></contrib></contrib-group><pub-date pub-type="ppub"><month>09</month><year>2018</year></pub-date><volume>1</volume><issue>2</issue><fpage>79</fpage><lpage>79</lpage><permissions><copyright-year>2018</copyright-year><copyright-holder>American Meat Science Association</copyright-holder><license license-type="open-access"><p>This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC-ND license (<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/</ext-link>)</p></license></permissions><abstract><sec><title>Objectives</title><p>The objective of this study was to determine whether the addition of a pork preblend within a smoked sausage formulation affects quality characteristics of the final product in a refrigerated retail display case for a shelf life of 160 d.</p></sec><sec><title>Materials and Methods</title><p>Pork preblend treatments held for either 0, 4, or 7 d were individually formulated into smoked sausages and analyzed for cook yield on d 0, purge percentage on d 110, 131, and 160 and instrumental external color, pH, salt content, proximate analysis, Warner-Bratzler shear force (WBSF), thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS) and sensory analysis on d 0, 110, 131, and 160 of display at an average 2.65°C under fluorescent lighting. Three replications of the experiment were conducted. Data was analyzed using PROC MIXED in SAS 9.2 (SAS Inst. Inc., Cary, NC).</p></sec><sec><title>Results</title><p>No Preblend × Days of display interactions (<italic>P</italic> &gt; 0.05) were shown for any attributes measured except for b* values (<italic>P</italic> &lt; 0.05). Initially on display d 0, similar (<italic>P</italic> &gt; 0.05) b* values for preblend treatments held for 0 and 4 d were both less (<italic>P</italic> &lt; 0.05) yellow than d 7; however, for d 110 and 160 no differences (<italic>P</italic> &gt; 0.05) were shown between preblends. On d 131, preblend d 0 was similar (<italic>P</italic> &gt; 0.05) to d 7 but more (<italic>P</italic> &lt; 0.05) yellow than d 4.</p><p>No differences (<italic>P</italic> &gt; 0.05) were shown between preblend treatments for cook yield, percent purge loss, proximate analysis, pH, salt content, thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS), L*, a*, b*, a*:b*, saturation index, or hue angle. When evaluating the effect of preblend treatment on sensory characteristics of bite, juiciness, flavor intensity, saltiness, off flavor, and mouthfeel coating, no differences (<italic>P</italic> &gt; 0.05) were found.</p><p>Purge loss percentage, WBSF, pH, moisture, fat, and protein analyses revealed no differences for any days of display (<italic>P</italic> &gt; 0.05). Sausage salt content decreased (<italic>P</italic> &lt; 0.05) from d 0 to d 110. For d 0 of display, a smaller (<italic>P</italic> &lt; 0.05) TBARS value was found compared to all other days (110, 131, and 160); however, d 110, 131, and 160 revealed no differences (<italic>P</italic> &lt; 0.05). As days of display progressed, sausage product became lighter, less red, had a lower a*:b* and were less saturated and had a greater hue angle (<italic>P</italic> &lt; 0.05). Days of display did not affect juiciness, saltiness or off flavor (<italic>P</italic> &gt; 0.05); however, bite, flavor intensity and mouthfeel were affected by days of display (<italic>P</italic> &lt; 0.05). Results for bite were inconsistent with d 0 and 160 had similar scores while d 110 had the softest bite (<italic>P</italic> &lt; 0.05). Flavor intensity declined from d 0 to d 110; however, d 110, 131, and 160 were similar in flavor intensity. For mouthfeel, on days of display 0, 110, and 131, no statistical differences (<italic>P</italic> &gt; 0.05) were found; however, d 160 had the least mouthfeel coating (<italic>P</italic> &lt; 0.05).</p></sec><sec><title>Conclusion</title><p>Preblend hold time did not influence any attributes measured on cooked sausage during 160 d of refrigerated display. Displaying vacuum packaged cooked dinner sausage under fluorescent light for up to 160 d makes sausage lighter, less red, less yellow, and increases lipid oxidation to a detectable level.</p></sec></abstract><kwd-group><title>Keywords: </title><kwd>extended shelflife</kwd><kwd>fluorescent lighting</kwd><kwd>nitrite</kwd><kwd>pork preblend</kwd><kwd>precooked smoked sausage</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta><custom-meta-wrap><custom-meta><meta-name>author</meta-name><meta-value>Collins A.</meta-value></custom-meta><custom-meta><meta-name>author</meta-name><meta-value>Boyle E.</meta-value></custom-meta><custom-meta><meta-name>author</meta-name><meta-value>O’Quinn T.</meta-value></custom-meta><custom-meta><meta-name>author</meta-name><meta-value>Houser T.</meta-value></custom-meta><custom-meta><meta-name>author</meta-name><meta-value>Vahl C.</meta-value></custom-meta></custom-meta-wrap><ar:concepts xmlns:ar="http://appliedrelevance.com"><ar:concept><ar:id>c33e404a441c6ba9648f88af3c68a1ca</ar:id><ar:name>Statistics</ar:name><ar:path a="a">Agronomy|Training &amp; Education|Statistics</ar:path><ar:taxonomy>Agronomy</ar:taxonomy></ar:concept></ar:concepts></front><custom-meta-container><journal-date-data><jdate>2018-09-13</jdate></journal-date-data><journal-year>2018</journal-year><journal-month>09</journal-month><journal-title>Meat and Muscle Biology</journal-title><journal-issue>2</journal-issue><journal-fpage>79</journal-fpage><journal-volume>1</journal-volume><journal-lpage>79</journal-lpage><insert-date>September 13, 2018</insert-date></custom-meta-container></article>
