<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="2.3" xml:lang="EN" annotation-version="1.0"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="hwp">mmb</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">mmb</journal-id><journal-title>Meat and Muscle Biology</journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="full">MMB</abbrev-journal-title><issn pub-type="epub">2575-985X</issn><publisher><publisher-name>American Meat Science Association</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">rmc2018.118</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.221751/rmc2018.118</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>2018 Reciprocal Meat Conference – Meat and Poultry Safety</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Antimicrobial Effects of Peroxyacetic Acid Acidified with Various Acids when Applied to Inoculated Prerigor Beef Carcass Surface Tissue</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" contact-id="0" contact-type="auto"><name><surname>Britton</surname><given-names>B. C.</given-names></name><aff><label>1</label>Animal Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, 80523, USA</aff></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" contact-id="0" contact-type="auto"><name><surname>Geornaras</surname><given-names>I.</given-names></name><aff><label>1</label>Animal Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, 80523, USA</aff></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" contact-id="0" contact-type="auto"><name><surname>Woerner</surname><given-names>D. R.</given-names></name><aff><label>1</label>Animal Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, 80523, USA</aff></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" contact-id="0" contact-type="auto"><name><surname>Delmore</surname><given-names>R. J.</given-names></name><aff><label>1</label>Animal Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, 80523, USA</aff></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" contact-id="0" contact-type="auto"><name><surname>Martin</surname><given-names>J. N.</given-names></name><aff><label>1</label>Animal Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, 80523, USA</aff></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" contact-id="0" contact-type="auto"><name><surname>Reagan</surname><given-names>J. O.</given-names></name><aff><label>2</label>Zoetis, Parsippany, NJ, 07054, USA</aff></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" contact-id="0" contact-type="auto"><name><surname>Belk</surname><given-names>K. E.</given-names></name><aff><label>1</label>Animal Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, 80523, USA</aff></contrib></contrib-group><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">*Corresponding author. Email: <email>brianna.britton@colostate.edu</email> (B. C. Britton)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="ppub"><month>04</month><year>2018</year></pub-date><volume>2</volume><issue>2</issue><fpage>133</fpage><lpage>133</lpage><permissions><copyright-year>2019</copyright-year><copyright-holder>American Meat Science Association</copyright-holder><license license-type="open-access"><p>This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC-ND license (<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/</ext-link>)</p></license></permissions><abstract><sec><title>Objectives</title><p>Two studies were conducted to evaluate the antimicrobial effects of blends of peroxyacetic acid (PAA) acidified with various acids against inoculated populations of nonpathogenic <italic>Escherichia coli</italic> biotype I surrogates for pathogenic <italic>E. coli</italic> and <italic>Salmonella</italic> on warm, prerigor beef carcass surface brisket tissue.</p></sec><sec><title>Materials and Methods</title><p>In phase I, 10 × 10 cm pieces (<italic>n</italic> = 10) of warm, prerigor beef carcass surface brisket tissue were inoculated (6 to 7 log CFU/cm<sup>2</sup>) with a 5-strain mixture of nonpathogenic <italic>E. coli</italic> biotype I surrogates. Samples were either left untreated (control) or were immersed for 10 s in PAA (400 ppm) acidified with lactic acid (3.5%), PAA (400 ppm) acidified with acetic acid (2%), PAA (400 ppm) acidified with citric acid (1%), PAA (400 ppm) acidified with a sulfuric acid and sodium sulfate blend (pH 1.2 and pH 1.8; SSS), and PAA (300 ppm) acidified with SSS (pH 1.2). All samples were analyzed 5 min post-treatment for surviving <italic>Enterobacteriaceae</italic> populations. In phase II, 10 × 10 cm pieces (<italic>n</italic> = 10) of prerigor beef tissue inoculated (6 to 7 log CFU/cm<sup>2</sup>) with the same 5-strain mixture of nonpathogenic <italic>E. coli</italic> surrogates were either left untreated or were spray-treated (10 s) with water, PAA (350 ppm), PAA (400 ppm), PAA (400 ppm) acidified with acetic acid (2%), PAA (400 ppm) acidified with SSS (pH 1.2), or PAA (350 ppm) acidified with SSS (pH 1.2). Untreated and treated beef tissue samples were analyzed 5 min post-treatment for <italic>E. coli</italic> counts. Data were analyzed using the lsmeans package in R (Rstudio, 2015, Boston, MA) with antimicrobial treatment (including surfactant treatments) as the independent variable. Least-squares means were separated using a significance level of ɑ = 0.05.</p></sec><sec><title>Results</title><p>All immersion treatments evaluated in phase I effectively (<italic>P</italic> &lt; 0.05) reduced inoculated <italic>E. coli</italic> populations on the prerigor beef carcass surface tissue by at least 2.3 log CFU/cm<sup>2</sup>. The 400 ppm PAA treatments acidified with lactic acid, SSS (pH 1.2), or acetic acid were the most (<italic>P</italic> &lt; 0.05) effective treatments, lowering inoculated bacterial counts from 6.2 log CFU/cm<sup>2</sup> to 3.4, 3.4, and 3.7 log CFU/cm<sup>2</sup>, respectively. In phase II, all of the tested antimicrobial spray treatments effectively (<italic>P</italic> &lt; 0.05) lowered initial inoculated <italic>E. coli</italic> counts (6.4 log CFU/cm<sup>2</sup>) by 1.7 to 1.9 log CFU/cm<sup>2</sup>. No (<italic>P</italic> ≥ 0.05) differences in efficacy were observed between the 5 antimicrobial treatments.</p></sec><sec><title>Conclusion</title><p>Since acidifying PAA with acetic acid or SSS is comparable to utilizing PAA, this could provide the industry with alternative antimicrobial intervention systems. Alternating the use of antimicrobials in a multiple-hurdle system could aid in the prevention of antimicrobial resistance.</p></sec></abstract><kwd-group><title>Keywords: </title><kwd>antimicrobial intervention</kwd><kwd>beef</kwd><kwd>escherichia coli</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta><custom-meta-wrap><custom-meta><meta-name>author</meta-name><meta-value>Britton B. C.</meta-value></custom-meta><custom-meta><meta-name>author</meta-name><meta-value>Geornaras I.</meta-value></custom-meta><custom-meta><meta-name>author</meta-name><meta-value>Woerner D. R.</meta-value></custom-meta><custom-meta><meta-name>author</meta-name><meta-value>Delmore R. J.</meta-value></custom-meta><custom-meta><meta-name>author</meta-name><meta-value>Martin J. N.</meta-value></custom-meta><custom-meta><meta-name>author</meta-name><meta-value>Reagan J. O.</meta-value></custom-meta><custom-meta><meta-name>author</meta-name><meta-value>Belk K. E.</meta-value></custom-meta></custom-meta-wrap><ar:concepts xmlns:ar="http://appliedrelevance.com"><ar:concept><ar:id>a06e2d2a6164447fcb3aca27b61afd34</ar:id><ar:name>ppm</ar:name><ar:path a="a">Soils|Miscellaneous|ppm</ar:path><ar:taxonomy>Soils</ar:taxonomy></ar:concept></ar:concepts></front><custom-meta-container><journal-date-data><jdate>2019-04-25</jdate></journal-date-data><journal-year>2019</journal-year><journal-month>04</journal-month><journal-title>Meat and Muscle Biology</journal-title><journal-issue>2</journal-issue><journal-fpage>133</journal-fpage><journal-volume>2</journal-volume><journal-lpage>133</journal-lpage><insert-date>April 25, 2019</insert-date></custom-meta-container></article>
