<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="2.3" xml:lang="EN" annotation-version="1.0"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="hwp">mmb</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">mmb</journal-id><journal-title>Meat and Muscle Biology</journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="full">MMB</abbrev-journal-title><issn pub-type="epub">2575-985X</issn><publisher><publisher-name>American Meat Science Association</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">rmc2018.123</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.221751/rmc2018.123</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>2018 Reciprocal Meat Conference – Meat and Poultry Safety</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Antimicrobial Effects of Lauric Arginate, Peroxyacetic Acid, and Buffered Sulfuric Acid against Pathogenic Bacteria Populations in Beef Trimmings Destined for Ground Beef</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" contact-id="0" contact-type="auto"><name><surname>Yang</surname><given-names>F. L.</given-names></name><aff>Department of Animal Science, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, 72701, USA</aff></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" contact-id="0" contact-type="auto"><name><surname>Anschutz</surname><given-names>K. S.</given-names></name><aff>Department of Animal Science, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, 72701, USA</aff></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" contact-id="0" contact-type="auto"><name><surname>Pohlman</surname><given-names>F. W.</given-names></name><aff>Department of Animal Science, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, 72701, USA</aff></contrib></contrib-group><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">*Corresponding author. Email: <email>flyang@uark.edu</email> (F. L. Yang)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="ppub"><month>04</month><year>2018</year></pub-date><volume>2</volume><issue>2</issue><fpage>139</fpage><lpage>139</lpage><permissions><copyright-year>2019</copyright-year><copyright-holder>American Meat Science Association</copyright-holder><license license-type="open-access"><p>This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC-ND license (<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/</ext-link>)</p></license></permissions><abstract><sec><title>Objectives</title><p>The objective is to find effective measures to control or inhibit growth of <italic>E. coli</italic> O157:H7, non-O157:H7 and <italic>Salmonella</italic> species in ground beef through exploring the effectiveness of antimicrobial properties of lauric arginate, peroxyacetic acid and buffered sulfuric acid, applied through an electrostatic spray system on inoculated trimmings.</p></sec><sec><title>Materials and Methods</title><p>Inoculums were prepared from frozen (–80°C) stock cultures of <italic>Escherichia coli</italic> O157:H7, O145, O121, O111, O103, O45, O26, and <italic>Salmonella typhimurium</italic> DT 104 and <italic>newport</italic> MDR-AmpC. <italic>E. coli</italic> was maintained by brain heart infusion (BHI) broth and <italic>S. typhimuriuma</italic> and <italic>newport</italic> were maintained by BHI broth containing nalidixic acid. The cocktail was pooled (420mL <italic>E. coli</italic> and 420mL <italic>Salmonella</italic> log 10<sup>4</sup> CFU/mL). The cocktail was hand mixed in a sterile bag with thawed beef trimmings and allowed to attach, then meat was drained and separated into 4 batches and placed in a cooler for 14 h. Inoculated beef trimmings were sprayed (∼0.3 mL/g; 3 replicates/treatment) with either 5% lauric arginate (LA), 0.02% peroxacetic acid (PA) or buffered sulfuric acid (pH = 3; SA) and ground twice using a Hobart Grinder (3.2 mm plate) along with an unsprayed control (C). Ground beef was divided, packaged on stryofoam trays with absorbent pads overwrapped with polyvinyl chloride film and stored in a display case under retail conditions. 25 g microbial samples taken on display d 0, 1, 2, 3, and 5 were placed in sterile stomacher bags with 225 mL of 0.1% BPW and homogenized for 2 min. Serial 10-fold dilutions were done and plated on Petrifilm aerobic plate count (APC), EMB, and SS in duplicates. After 24 h of incubation (37°C), EMB plates were counted and after 48 h APC and SS plates were counted. Counts were converted to log<sub>10</sub> and recorded as colony forming units per g of meat (CFU/g). Instrumental color was evaluated (CIE L*, a*, b*; 630/580 nm; hue angle; saturation index) on display d 0, 1, 2, 3, and 5 of simulated retail display using a Hunter Lab MiniScan EZ Spectrocolorimeter (A/10°). Analysis used MIXED procedure of SAS (SAS Inst. Inc., Carty, NC) in a 4 × 5 factorial arrangement with main effects spray treatment, display days and their interaction.</p></sec><sec><title>Results</title><p>The 3 treatments had no effect on APC (<italic>P</italic> = 0.85), <italic>E. coli</italic> (<italic>P</italic> = 0.54) and <italic>Salmonella</italic> (<italic>P</italic> = 0.55) growth. Display day had an effect (<italic>P</italic> &lt; 0.05) on APC, <italic>E. coli</italic> and <italic>Salmonella</italic> growth. Display d 5 had increased growth for APC, <italic>E. coli</italic> and <italic>Salmonella</italic>, followed by display d 3, and 2. There was an interaction for APC with LA, PA and C having increased growth on display d 7 but SA had decreased growth on display d 5. There was also an interaction for <italic>E. coli</italic> growth with LA, PA, and C having increased growth on display d 5 but SA had decreased growth on display d 5. PA and SA treatments were darker (lower L*; <italic>P</italic> &lt; 0.05) than LA and C treatments. PA and SA treatments were redder (greater a*; <italic>P</italic> &lt; 0.05) than LA and C treatments. Hue angle was greater (<italic>P</italic> &lt; 0.05) for LA and C treatments compared to PA and SA. Chroma was greatest (<italic>P</italic> &lt; 0.05) in SA and lowest in LA with PA and C being intermediate. PA and SA had the highest (<italic>P</italic> &lt; 0.05) oxymyoglobin ratio followed by C and then LA.</p></sec><sec><title>Conclusion</title><p>SA was the only effective spray treatment but only by display d 5 for APC and <italic>E. coli</italic>. Spray treatments also have an impact on display color of ground beef.</p></sec></abstract><kwd-group><title>Keywords: </title><kwd>antimircobial</kwd><kwd>color</kwd><kwd>display</kwd><kwd>ground beef</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta><custom-meta-wrap><custom-meta><meta-name>author</meta-name><meta-value>Yang F. L.</meta-value></custom-meta><custom-meta><meta-name>author</meta-name><meta-value>Anschutz K. S.</meta-value></custom-meta><custom-meta><meta-name>author</meta-name><meta-value>Pohlman F. W.</meta-value></custom-meta></custom-meta-wrap><ar:concepts xmlns:ar="http://appliedrelevance.com"><ar:concept><ar:id>ab20ceff93dc391ab90fc64d98118151</ar:id><ar:name>chroma</ar:name><ar:path a="a">Soils|Miscellaneous|chroma</ar:path><ar:taxonomy>Soils</ar:taxonomy></ar:concept><ar:concept><ar:id>93122a9e4abcba124d5a7d4beaba3f89</ar:id><ar:name>nm</ar:name><ar:path a="a">Soils|Miscellaneous|nm</ar:path><ar:taxonomy>Soils</ar:taxonomy></ar:concept></ar:concepts></front><custom-meta-container><journal-date-data><jdate>2019-04-25</jdate></journal-date-data><journal-year>2019</journal-year><journal-month>04</journal-month><journal-title>Meat and Muscle Biology</journal-title><journal-issue>2</journal-issue><journal-fpage>139</journal-fpage><journal-volume>2</journal-volume><journal-lpage>139</journal-lpage><insert-date>April 25, 2019</insert-date></custom-meta-container></article>
