<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD with OASIS Tables with MathML3 v1.2d1 20130915//EN" "JATS-archive-oasis-article1.dtd"><!--Arbortext, Inc., 1988-2011, v.4002--><article article-type="research-article" xml:lang="en" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">MMB</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Meat and Muscle Biology</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2575-985X</issn><publisher><publisher-name>American Meat Science Association</publisher-name><publisher-loc/></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.22175/mmb.20151</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id"/><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Muscle-Specific Pork Quality of the <italic>Longissimus Thoracis</italic>, <italic>Psoas Major</italic>, <italic>Semitendinosus</italic>, <italic>Triceps Brachii</italic>, and <italic>Gluteus Medius</italic></article-title><alt-title alt-title-type="right-running">Wang et al.&#x02003;&#x02003;&#x02003;&#x02003;&#x02003;&#x02003;&#x02003;&#x02003;&#x02003;&#x02003;&#x02003;&#x02003;&#x02003;Muscle-specific pork quality</alt-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>Yifei</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Brown</surname><given-names>Rebecca A.</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Conte</surname><given-names>Milena</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Garcia</surname><given-names>Lyda G.</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name><surname>Bohrer</surname><given-names>Benjamin M.</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><aff id="aff1"><institution>The Ohio State University</institution>, Department of Animal Sciences, Columbus, OH 43210, <country>USA</country></aff></contrib-group><author-notes><corresp id="cor1"><label><sup>*</sup></label>Corresponding author. Email: <email>bohrer.13@osu.edu</email> (Benjamin M. Bohrer)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date date-type="epub" publication-format="electronic"><day>00</day><month>00</month><year>0000</year></pub-date><volume>9</volume><issue>1</issue><fpage>1</fpage><lpage>20</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>09</day><month>05</month><year>2025</year></date><date date-type="accepted"><day>22</day><month>06</month><year>2025</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#x000A9; 2025 Wang, Brown, Conte, Garcia, Bohrer.</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2025</copyright-year><copyright-holder>&#x000A9; 2025 Wang, Brown, Conte, Garcia, Bohrer</copyright-holder><license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY license (<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link>)</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><title>Abstract</title><p>The objectives were to characterize the rate of pH and temperature decline, pork quality attributes, and proteolytic changes during postmortem aging of 5 muscle cuts, the <italic>longissimus thoracis</italic> (LT), <italic>psoas major</italic> (PM), <italic>semitendinosus</italic> (ST), <italic>triceps brachii</italic> (TB), and <italic>gluteus medius</italic> (GM), as well as to evaluate the influence of endpoint cooking temperature on eating experience for each pork muscle cut. Muscle-specific variation for the response variables was evaluated for 15 crossbred market barrows. The main effect of muscle was significant (<italic>P</italic>&#x02009;&#x0003C;&#x02009;.01) for rate of pH and temperature decline, instrumental color (<italic>L*</italic> and <italic>a*</italic>), drip loss, and intramuscular fat content. The pH of the PM muscle declined the fastest (occurring before 1-h postmortem) among the 5 muscles evaluated. Beyond the PM muscle, the LT muscle had a faster rate of pH decline and the lowest pH levels at 12-h and 24-h postmortem compared with all 4 of the other muscles evaluated. The LT and PM muscles had faster (<italic>P</italic>&#x02009;&#x0003C;&#x02009;.05) rates of temperature decline from 1-h to 3-h postmortem compared with the TB and GM muscles, while temperature decline of the ST muscle was intermediate. A muscle and cooking temperature interaction (<italic>P</italic>&#x02009;&#x0003C;&#x02009;.01) was observed for Warner-Bratzler shear force (WBSF), sensory tenderness, and sensory juiciness. In general, reducing the endpoint cooking temperature from 71&#x000B0;C to 63&#x000B0;C led to improvements in WBSF and sensory traits. However, muscle-specific differences existed, particularly when observing the magnitude of change in WBSF and sensory traits between the 2 endpoint cooking temperatures. These data may be used to explain how forgiving each individual muscle cut was when endpoint cooking temperatures were adjusted. Overall, pork quality, postmortem proteolysis changes, and eating experience appeared in a muscle-specific manner, and therefore consideration should be given to the individual muscle cuts of interest.</p></abstract><kwd-group><title>Keywords:</title><kwd>pork muscle cut</kwd><kwd>postmortem aging</kwd><kwd>proteolysis</kwd><kwd>degree of doneness</kwd><kwd>sensory</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="sec1"><title>Introduction</title><p>According to per capita consumption data from 2022, pork ranks first in per capita meat consumption in the world, and third in the United States, behind beef and chicken (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r51">Valcu-Lisman, 2022</xref>). Approximately 26% of pork consumed in the United States is comprised of fresh pork (i.e.,&#x000A0;not further processed), and among that 26%, approximately one-half is comprised of the loin muscle (<italic>longissimus thoracis et lumborum</italic> [LTL]) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r50">The Pork Checkoff, 2009</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r48">Statista, 2021</xref>). This indicates that there are great opportunities for the pork industry to diversify fresh pork offerings for consumers in the United States. However, most of the existing meat science research on fresh pork quality has focused solely on fresh quality traits and eating experience of the LTL muscle. Studies have suggested that the quality traits of pork LTL were not representative of the entire carcass (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r2">Arkfeld et&#x000A0;al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r6">Bohrer et&#x000A0;al., 2024</xref>). Therefore, it is important to characterize the relationship between pork quality traits and eating experience of different pork cuts.</p><p>Variation in pork quality exists across different muscle cuts due to differences in their inherent biochemical profile, such as muscle fiber composition, which influence energy metabolism, rate and extent of pH decline, rate of temperature decline, color, water-holding capacity, tenderness, and postmortem proteolysis. Muscles predominantly composed of glycolytic fibers may exhibit a faster rate of pH decline and a lower ultimate pH, whereas muscles primarily composed of oxidative fibers may experience a slower rate of pH decline and a greater ultimate pH. The variation in color among different pork muscle cuts reflects the differences in muscle fiber types, which influence chemical forms of myoglobin and muscle pH. Pork tenderness is highly variable and likely exhibits a muscle-specific profile (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r55">Wheeler et&#x000A0;al., 2000</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r30">Lee et&#x000A0;al., 2015</xref>). The extent of proteolysis may vary across muscles due to differences in the susceptibility of substrates associated with muscle fiber types and the activity of the proteolytic enzyme calpain-1 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r14">Christensen et&#x000A0;al., 2004</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r37">Melody et&#x000A0;al., 2004</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r40">Muroya et&#x000A0;al., 2010</xref>). In general, muscle-specific pork tenderness results from the differences of muscle fiber type distribution (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r13">Choe et&#x000A0;al., 2008</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r22">Jeong et&#x000A0;al., 2010</xref>), susceptibility of proteolysis (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r55">Wheeler et&#x000A0;al., 2000</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r11">Carlson et&#x000A0;al., 2017</xref>), collagen content (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r55">Wheeler et&#x000A0;al., 2000</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r41">Nishimura, 2010</xref>), and sarcomere length (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r16">Feldhusen and K&#x000FC;hne, 1992</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r55">Wheeler et&#x000A0;al., 2000</xref>). Differences in water-holding capacity among muscle cuts can be attributed to the rate and extent of pH decline, which directly impact the functionality of myofibrillar proteins by altering their ability to bind water (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r21">Huff-Lonergan and Lonergan, 2007</xref>). It has been well-established that the rate and the extent of pH decline play a critical role in pork quality traits (particularly the LTL muscle cut), such as color, water-holding capacity, tenderness, and postmortem proteolysis (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r5">Bidner et&#x000A0;al., 2004</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r21">Huff-Lonergan and Lonergan, 2007</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r7">Boler et&#x000A0;al., 2010</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r28">Kim et&#x000A0;al., 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r42">Pomponio et&#x000A0;al., 2010</xref>). The influence of pH and temperature decline on pork quality attributes likely varies in a muscle-specific manner, reflecting the unique biochemical characteristics of individual muscles. However, limited information is currently available regarding the relationship between pH and temperature decline with quality traits in different pork muscles.</p><p>Juiciness, tenderness, and flavor are important sensory attributes influencing overall eating experience and repurchase decisions of fresh pork. Inconsistent eating experience stemming from challenges in the aforementioned sensory attributes has been an important area addressed by meat science researchers, and multiple meat quality traits (i.e., pH, color, marbling, firmness) have been evaluated for their ability to predict juiciness, tenderness, and flavor attributes of pork loin chops (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r20">Huff-Lonergan et&#x000A0;al., 2002</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r22">Jeong et&#x000A0;al., 2010</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r38">Moeller et&#x000A0;al., 2010</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r56">Wilson et&#x000A0;al., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r46">Richardson et&#x000A0;al., 2018</xref>). One consistency that several research studies have reported is the importance of endpoint cooking temperature on juiciness, tenderness, and flavor attributes of pork loin chops (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r38">Moeller et&#x000A0;al., 2010</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r29">Klehm et&#x000A0;al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r19">Honegger et&#x000A0;al., 2019</xref>). The influence of pork quality traits and endpoint cooking temperature for other pork muscle cuts have yet to be investigated.</p><p>Given the knowledge gaps, the objectives of this research were (1) to evaluate the relationship among rate and extent of pH decline, rate of temperature decline, color, water-holding capacity, tenderness, and postmortem proteolysis; and (2) to evaluate the influence of endpoint cooking temperature on instrumental tenderness and eating experience for 5 different pork muscles, including <italic>longissimus thoracis</italic> ([LT]; i.e.,&#x000A0;the major muscle in the loin primal), <italic>psoas major</italic> ([PM]; i.e.,&#x000A0;the tenderloin muscle), <italic>semitendinosus</italic> ([ST]; i.e.,&#x000A0;the eye muscle from the ham), <italic>triceps brachii</italic> ([TB]; i.e.,&#x000A0;the center muscle from the shoulder), and <italic>gluteus medius</italic> ([GM]; i.e.,&#x000A0;the major muscle from the sirloin). It was hypothesized that the rate and extent of pH decline, instrumental color, tenderness, water-holding capacity, sensory traits, and proteolytic degradation differ among pork muscles and that the influence of endpoint cooking temperature on sensory attributes would also vary among muscle cuts.</p></sec><sec id="sec2"><title>Materials and Methods</title><p>Approval from the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee was not required for this study because live animal data were not collected. The sensory portion of the study was reviewed by the Institutional Review Board at The Ohio State University, given the study number 2024E0962, and deemed exempt from full review.</p><sec id="sec2.1"><title>Animals and sample collection</title><p>A total of 15 barrows of similar genetics (maternal-line nonselect offspring comprised of Yorkshire and Landrace breeds) were procured from the university research farm and slaughtered under federal inspection at The Ohio State University Meat Science Teaching Laboratory with approved humane slaughter procedures using single-file electrical stunning. The pigs were slaughtered in 2 slaughter events (i.e.,&#x000A0;blocks) at an average live weight (&#x000B1; SD) of 122.47&#x000A0;kg (&#x000B1; 3.79&#x000A0;kg). The first slaughter event consisted of 8 barrows, whereas the second slaughter event consisted of 7 barrows. Backfat thickness was measured at the last rib (midline) location. Carcasses weighed an average weight of 93.23&#x000A0;kg (&#x000B1; 3.02&#x000A0;kg) and measured with an average last rib backfat thickness of 3.88&#x000A0;cm (&#x000B1; 0.55&#x000A0;cm).</p><p>The pH and temperature of the LT, PM, ST, TB, and GM muscles from the left side of each carcass were measured at 1-h, 3-h, 6-h, 9-h, 12-h, and 24-h postmortem during the conventional chilling process. An approximately 15&#x000A0;cm&#x02009;&#x000D7;&#x02009;15&#x000A0;cm area of skin (approximately 3&#x02013;5&#x000A0;cm thick) on the exterior surface of the carcass was partially incised and reflected like a curtain using a clean, sharp knife to expose the ST, GM, LT, and TB muscles. This approach allowed for repeated pH and temperature measurements to be collected throughout the sampling period without substantially affecting the temperature decline of each muscle, as the skin flap could cover the area between measurements. The LT was measured at the 10th rib location of the carcass, while the PM was measured on the ventral muscle below the transverse process. The ST was measured on the posterior face of the ham. The TB was measured at the triangular area bound by the ventral edge of the scapula and the posterior edge of the humerus. The GM was measured between the ham and the loin, at the lateral face of the ilium bone. pH was obtained by inserting a glass-tipped probe attached to a portable pH meter into the muscle at a new location within the exposed 15&#x000A0;cm&#x02009;&#x000D7;&#x02009;15&#x000A0;cm area for each measurement (Meat Probes Inc., Topeka, Kansas, USA). The pH meter was calibrated with pH&#x02009;=&#x02009;4.01 and pH&#x02009;=&#x02009;7.00 buffer solutions that were stored at refrigerated temperatures (&#x02264;4&#x000B0;C) prior to use. Temperature was measured using a digital meat thermometer probe (Taylor USA, Oak Brook, Illinois, USA). At each time point when pH and temperature measurements were conducted (1-h, 3-h, 6-h, 9-h, 12-h, and 24-h postmortem), approximately 100 g samples from the LT, PM, ST, TB, and GM muscles were collected using a scalpel blade, placed in a sterile 15&#x000A0;mL plastic centrifuge tube, and then immediately placed in liquid nitrogen for flash freezing before further storage in a &#x02212;80&#x000B0;C freezer.</p><p>The LT, PM, ST, TB, and GM muscles were removed from the carcasses at 24-h postmortem. The thoracis portion (anterior to last rib) of the LTL muscle was utilized, while the entire PM, ST, TB, and GM muscles were used. After trimming subcutaneous fat and connective tissue, the muscle samples from the right side of the carcasses were vacuum packaged and allotted to 10 d of postmortem aging at 4&#x000B0;C and then frozen at &#x02212;20&#x000B0;C until use for proximate analysis and sensory evaluation. The muscle samples from the left side of the carcasses were divided into seven 2.54-cm thick sections. One of the muscle sections was allotted to fresh meat quality analysis at 1-d postmortem. The remaining 6 muscle sections were vacuum packaged, and randomly allocated to 1 of the 6 treatments, which consisted of a 3&#x02009;&#x000D7;&#x02009;2 factorial design with 3 postmortem aging time points (1-d, 3-d, and 10-d) and 2 endpoint cooking temperatures (63&#x000B0;C or 71&#x000B0;C). After each postmortem aging period elapsed, the muscles were frozen at &#x02212;20&#x000B0;C until the Warner-Bratzler shear force (WBSF) analysis took place. The remaining samples from the left side of the carcasses were cut into 3 small cuts (approximately 100 g each) and were then placed in 3 sterile 50&#x000A0;mL plastic centrifuge tubes, which were assigned to storage for either 1-d, 3-d, or 10-d postmortem at 4&#x000B0;C, respectively. After each of the respective storage days, the samples were immediately placed in liquid nitrogen for flash freezing before further storage in a &#x02212;80&#x000B0;C freezer for further proteomic analysis.</p></sec><sec id="sec2.2"><title>Instrumental color and drip loss</title><p>Samples (used for the quality analysis at 1-d postmortem) were allowed to bloom for a period of 30&#x000A0;min prior to instrumental color evaluation. Instrumental Commission Internationale de l&#x02019;&#x000C9;clairage (<italic>L*</italic>, <italic>a*</italic>, <italic>b*</italic>) color values were evaluated using a handheld colorimeter with D<sub>65</sub> light source, an 11&#x000A0;mm aperture, and a 10&#x000B0; observer (Minolta CM-700d; Minolta Corp., Osaka, Japan) on the cut surface of each sample following carcass fabrication at 24-h postmortem. Drip loss was assessed using the EZ cup method described previously by Rasmussen and Andersson (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r44">1996</xref>). A 25&#x000A0;mm diameter core from each sample was weighed at 24-h and 72-h postmortem after being placed within specialized EZ drip loss containers (Sarstedt product no. 86.290; Sarstedt Ag &#x00026; Co., N&#x000FC;mbrecht, Germany) to quantify drip loss over a 48&#x000A0;h period at the storage temperature of 4&#x000B0;C.</p></sec><sec id="sec2.3"><title>Proximate analysis</title><p>Approximately 100 g samples (from right-side carcasses) had their subcutaneous fat removed and were individually homogenized using a food processor (Hamilton Beach model 70760, type FP19; Hamilton Beach Brands, Glen Allen, Virginia, USA). Moisture was measured using the air oven drying procedure described by AOAC method 990.19, while intramuscular fat (IMF) was measured using the Soxhlet extraction technique described by AOAC method 960.39 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r1">AOAC International, 2016</xref>). Duplicate homogenized pork samples (7 g each) were placed on aluminum weighing pans with 2 layers of #1 filter paper, weighed, and subsequently dried in a drying oven (Thermo Scientific Isotemp 100&#x000A0;L Forced Air Oven; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA) at 100&#x000B0;C for 24&#x000A0;h. After drying, the samples were cooled in a vacuum-sealed desiccator for 15&#x000A0;min before being reweighed to determine the moisture content. Aluminum weighing pans containing samples were washed multiple times with warm chloroform methanol (mixed at a ratio of 87:13) in the Soxhlet apparatus for 9&#x000A0;h and dried in a drying oven at 100&#x000B0;C for 24&#x000A0;h before being reweighed to determine the IMF. Results from duplicate samples with a coefficient of variance less than 15% were averaged and reported.</p></sec><sec id="sec2.4"><title>Warner-Bratzler shear force and cooking loss analysis</title><p>Pork samples were removed from the freezer and placed in a single layer at an ambient temperature of 2&#x000B0;C to thaw for 24&#x000A0;h prior to WBSF analysis. Samples were assigned to endpoint cooking temperatures of either 63&#x000B0;C or 71&#x000B0;C. Samples were cooked for 35&#x000A0;min using the sous-vide technique in a precision water bath (Thermo Scientific Precision GP20; Thermo Fisher Scientific) that was set to either 63.5&#x000B0;C or 71.5&#x000B0;C, respectively. The water bath was set 0.5&#x000B0;C above the target endpoint temperatures to ensure that the samples reliably reached 63&#x000B0;C and 71&#x000B0;C. Internal cooking temperature was monitored throughout cooking by inserting a digital temperature logger with 2 type K thermocouple wires connected to a handheld digital scanning thermometer (ThermoQ; ThermoWorks, American Fork, Utah, USA) into the geometric center of a nonstudy pork LT sample cut to similar dimensions to study samples. Once the internal temperature reached the targeted endpoint cooking temperature, samples were immediately moved to a refrigerated room (ambient temperature of 2&#x000B0;C) and placed on a drying rack in a single layer. After 12&#x000A0;h of refrigerated storage, cooked samples were removed from vacuum packages and reweighed. The percentage of weight difference between initial raw weight and cooked weight was calculated as cooking loss. Six 1.25&#x000A0;cm diameter cores cut parallel to the muscle fibers were obtained from each sample using a handheld coring device. Cores were sheared perpendicular to the direction of muscle fibers with a Warner-Bratzler shear attachment equipped to a TA-XT Plus 100 Connect texture analyzer (Texture Technologies Corp., Hamilton, Massachusetts, USA) at a crosshead speed of 2&#x000A0;mm/s. The peak force (kg) required to shear through each core was recorded, and the average peak force of 6 cores was calculated for each sample.</p></sec><sec id="sec2.5"><title>Whole muscle protein extraction</title><p>Frozen pork samples were homogenized and powdered in liquid nitrogen. Protein extraction was conducted following the procedure of Richardson et&#x000A0;al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r46">2018</xref>) with a few modifications. Powdered frozen samples (approximately 0.15 g) were homogenized with 1&#x000A0;mL of whole muscle buffer (2% sodium dodecyl sulfate wt/vol and 10mM sodium phosphate, pH 7.0) in a bead mill homogenizer (Bead Mill 4 Homogenizer; Thermo Fisher Scientific) at the #2 speed setting for 200&#x000A0;s. The homogenate was then centrifuged at 3220&#x02009;&#x000D7;&#x02009;<italic>g</italic> for 15&#x000A0;min. Protein concentration of the supernatant was determined using a bicinchoninic acid protein assay kit (Pierce Protein Research Products, Rockford, Illinois, USA). Samples were adjusted to a final protein concentration of 4.0&#x000A0;mg/mL by mixing 0.03&#x000A0;mL of beta mercaptoethanol, 0.25&#x000A0;mL of Laemmli sodium dodecyl sulfate sample buffer tracking dye, and whole muscle buffer. Samples were then vortexed and heated on a heating block for 15&#x000A0;min at 50&#x000B0;C, followed by frozen storage at &#x02212;80&#x000B0;C until further analysis occurred.</p></sec><sec id="sec2.6"><title>Sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and western blot</title><p>Sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis was used for running load checks to ensure proper protein concentrations were achieved. Protein samples (40&#x000A0;&#x003BC;g per well) were loaded into 4&#x02013;12% Bis-Tris (bis[2-hydroxyethyl]amino-tris[hydroxymethyl]methane) gels (Invitrogen Bolt 4&#x02013;12% Bis-Tris PlusGels, 10-well; Thermo Fisher Scientific) for desmin and troponin-T analysis. Calpain-1 analysis was conducted using 8% Bis-Tris gels (Invitrogen Bolt 8% Bis-Tris PlusGels, 10-well; Thermo Fisher Scientific). Gels were electrophoresed using 2-morpholinoethanesulphonic acid SDS running buffer and were then transferred to a polyvinylidene fluoride blotting membrane using the iBlot 2 western blotting workflow system. Membranes were blocked using 5% nonfat dry milk in phosphate buffered saline (PBS)-tween solution for 1&#x000A0;h at room temperature and washed 3 times for 10&#x000A0;min each with PBS-tween solution before transferring to the iBind flex western device (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The membranes were incubated (1 target protein at a time) with the following primary antibodies, which were diluted with iBind flex solution (Thermo Fisher Scientific): 1:2000 mouse monoclonal anti-desmin immunoglobulin G ([IgG]; D1022; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, Missouri, USA), 1:2000 mouse monoclonal anti-troponin-T IgG (T6277, Sigma-Aldrich), 1:1000 mouse monoclonal anti-calpain-1 IgG (MA3&#x02013;940; Thermo Fisher Scientific), to determine desmin (and its degradation products), troponin-T (and its degradation products), and calpain-1 autolysis. The secondary antibody used for each of the membranes was goat-anti-mouse IgG, horseradish&#x02013;peroxidase-linked antibody (A28177; Thermo Fisher Scientific), which was diluted with iBind flex solution (Thermo Fisher Scientific) to the same dilution as primary antibodies, respectively. Blotting membranes were then washed with PBS-tween solution 3 times before protein detection. Protein bands were detected using a western blotting chemiluminescent detection kit (Pierce ECL western blotting substrate, Thermo Fisher Scientific). Immunoreactive bands were visualized using an iBright1500 imager (Thermo Fisher Scientific), and the area-defined density of each band was determined with iBright Analysis Software (Thermo Fisher Scientific). A consistent internal reference sample was loaded on each gel to standardize the intensity of protein bands. The intensity of targeted protein bands was quantified as a fold-change difference relative to the reference sample on the same gel. The reference sample used for desmin and troponin-T was a nonstudy LT muscle sample aged for 14-d postmortem, while the reference sample used for calpain-1 was a 1-h postmortem LT muscle sample. For desmin and troponin-T, the intensities of 55 kDa intact desmin, 42 kDa and 38 kDa degraded desmin, 37 kDa intact troponin-T, and 30 kDa and 28 kDa degraded troponin-T bands were quantified as a comparative ratio of the sample band to the corresponding reference protein band on each gel (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r11">Carlson et&#x000A0;al., 2017</xref>) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">Figure&#x000A0;1</xref>). Calpain-1 autolysis was determined as the percentage of the 80 kDa, 78 kDa, or 76 kDa bands within each sample (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r34">Ma and Kim, 2020</xref>) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">Figure&#x000A0;2</xref>). All the samples were analyzed in duplicate across different gels, with a coefficient of variance less than 20% to ensure repeatable results and the average results from the 2 gels were reported.</p><fig id="f1"><label>Figure 1.</label><caption><p>Representative western blot images showing postmortem change of desmin and troponin-T in 5 pork muscles. Ref&#x02009;=&#x02009;a nonstudy 14-d postmortem LT muscle. GM, <italic>gluteus medius</italic>; LT, <italic>longissimus thoracis</italic>; PM, <italic>psoas major</italic>; Ref, reference sample; ST, <italic>semitendinosus</italic>; TB, <italic>triceps brachii</italic>.</p></caption><graphic xlink:href="1.png"/></fig><fig id="f2"><label>Figure 2.</label><caption><p>Representative western blot showing postmortem changes of calpain-1 in 5 pork muscles at 24-h postmortem. All lanes were loaded with 40&#x000A0;&#x003BC;g of protein. Ref&#x02009;=&#x02009;1-h postmortem LT muscle. GM, <italic>gluteus medius</italic>; LT, <italic>longissimus thoracis</italic>; PM, <italic>psoas major</italic>; ST, <italic>semitendinosus</italic>; TB, <italic>triceps brachii</italic>.</p></caption><graphic xlink:href="2.png"/></fig></sec><sec id="sec2.7"><title>Trained sensory evaluation</title><p>The 5 muscle cuts from the right side of each pork carcass were subjected to 10 d of postmortem aging and cooked to endpoint cooking temperatures of either 63&#x000B0;C or 71&#x000B0;C to evaluate the influence of muscle and endpoint cooking temperature on sensory traits. A total of 11 panelists were trained to evaluate pork samples for tenderness, juiciness, chewiness, and pork flavor. Tenderness and chewiness training consisted of cooking a pork PM muscle to an internal endpoint cooking temperature of 63&#x000B0;C and a pork LT muscle to an endpoint cooking temperature of 71&#x000B0;C. Juiciness training consisted of cooking several LT muscles to different endpoint cooking temperatures including 63&#x000B0;C, 71&#x000B0;C, and 85&#x000B0;C. Flavor training consisted of cooking a pork ST muscle to an endpoint cooking temperature of 63&#x000B0;C and a LT muscle to an endpoint cooking temperature of 71&#x000B0;C. Additionally, Knorr brand pork bouillon cubes (Unilever, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, USA) were diluted to 4 different concentrations (6&#x000A0;mg/mL, 12&#x000A0;mg/mL, 24&#x000A0;mg/mL, and 48&#x000A0;mg/mL) for panelists to evaluate differences for pork flavor. Over the course of 2 training sessions, the panelists collectively established anchors and thresholds for tenderness, chewiness, juiciness, and pork flavor.</p><p>A total subsample of 38 muscle cuts cooked to 2 different endpoint cooking temperatures were used for the sensory testing (<italic>N</italic>&#x02009;=&#x02009;76 samples; 5 muscle cuts from 6 different carcasses and 4 muscle cuts from 2 different carcasses). Samples were removed from &#x02212;20&#x000B0;C storage and placed in a single layer on a plastic tray in a refrigerated room at 2&#x000B0;C for 24&#x000A0;h for proper thawing before each session. The samples were cooked to an endpoint cooking temperature of either 63&#x000B0;C or 71&#x000B0;C in a water bath using sous-vide cookers (Anova precision cooker; Anova Culinary, San Francisco, California, USA), then cut into 1.27&#x000A0;cm cubes (1.27&#x000A0;cm&#x02009;&#x000D7;&#x02009;1.27&#x000A0;cm&#x02009;&#x000D7;&#x02009;1.27&#x000A0;cm). The 76 samples were evaluated over 13 sensory sessions. Each sensory session consisted of no more than 6 pork samples, representing differences in muscles and endpoint cooking temperatures. Samples were assigned to sensory sessions using a balanced, incomplete block design, allowing every muscle and endpoint cooking temperature combination to be compared an equal number of times. Prepared samples were served to 6 predetermined trained panelists from the pool of 11 trained panelists in a randomized order during each sensory session. Panelists were provided with a pair of red shaded glasses to mask color differences between samples, along with a writing utensil, napkin, water, apple juice, and unsalted crackers. Tenderness, juiciness, chewiness, and pork flavor for each sample were assessed on 15&#x000A0;cm continuous-line scales, with anchors at 0, 7.5, and 15, where 0 was labeled as extremely tough, extremely dry, not chewy, or no pork flavor, and 15 was labeled as extremely tender, extremely juicy, extremely chewy, or very flavorful. Results from all panelists were averaged with coefficient of variation for tenderness, juiciness, chewiness, and pork flavor of 22.22%, 30.27%, 34.60%, and 14.18%, respectively. Least-squares means for each sample were computed based on the average responses of the 6 panelists per sample.</p></sec><sec id="sec2.8"><title>Statistical analysis</title><p>The assumptions of analysis of variance were assessed by evaluating the residuals for normality and homogeneity of variance using the UNIVARIATE procedure in SAS, with consideration given to the Shapiro-Wilk test for normality using SAS v9.4 (SAS Inst. Inc., Cary, NC, USA). The rate and the extent of pH and temperature decline were analyzed as repeated measures with a compound symmetry covariance structure using the MIXED procedure of SAS, with muscle, time, and their interaction as the fixed effects, and slaughter day as a random effect. When selecting the covariance structure for repeated measures, the Akaike Information Criterion and Bayesian Information Criterion were considered, and the covariance structure presenting the smallest values were selected. Instrumental color, drip loss, and calpain-1 autolysis were analyzed as a randomized complete block design using the GLIMMIX procedure of SAS, with muscle as the fixed effect, and pork carcass nested within slaughter event as the random effect. WBSF and cooking loss were analyzed as a split-split-plot design, with muscle as the whole plot factor, postmortem aging time as the subplot factor, endpoint cooking temperature as the sub-subplot factor, and slaughter day and pork carcass as random effects. The density of desmin, troponin-T, and their degradation products were analyzed as a split-plot design, with muscle as the whole plot factor, postmortem aging time as the subplot factor, and pork carcass and gel as random effects. Sensory traits were analyzed as an incomplete block design, with fixed effects of muscle, endpoint cooking temperature, and their interaction, and random effects of panel session, panelist, pork carcass, and their interactions. Nonsignificant random effects were excluded from the final model. Least-squares differences were determined using the LSMEANS statement with a Tukey-Kramer adjustment. Differences for all analyses were considered significant at <italic>P</italic>&#x02009;&#x0003C;&#x02009;.05. Stepwise regression analysis was performed with the REG procedure with selection criteria of SLENTRY&#x02009;=&#x02009;0.15 and SLSTAY&#x02009;=&#x02009;0.15 to develop prediction equations for the parameters of interest while including slaughter event as dichotomous variables in the model.</p></sec></sec><sec id="sec3"><title>Results and Discussion</title><sec id="sec3.1"><title>Postmortem pH and temperature decline</title><p>The influence of muscle on pH and temperature at each time point was significant (<italic>P</italic>&#x02009;&#x02264;&#x02009;.02) apart from temperature at 24&#x000A0;h (<italic>P</italic>&#x02009;=&#x02009;.34; <xref ref-type="table" rid="tab1">Table&#x000A0;1</xref>). An interaction between muscle and postmortem time (<italic>P</italic>&#x02009;&#x0003C;&#x02009;.01) was observed for pH and temperature decline, indicating muscles demonstrated a different rate of pH and temperature decline over the 24-h postmortem period (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">Figure&#x000A0;3</xref>). The rate of pH and temperature decline were further quantified by calculating the slope, defined as the change in pH or temperature per hour.</p><table-wrap id="tab1"><label>Table 1.</label><caption><p>The rate and extent of pH decline and rate of temperature decline, instrumental color, drip loss, and proximate composition in 5 pork muscles</p></caption><table frame="hsides" rules="groups"><colgroup><col align="left"/><col align="center"/><col align="center"/><col align="center"/><col align="center"/><col align="center"/><col align="center"/><col align="center"/></colgroup><thead><tr><th>Characteristics</th><th>LT</th><th>PM</th><th>ST</th><th>TB</th><th>GM</th><th>SEM</th><th align="center"><italic>P</italic> Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="8">Muscle pH</td></tr><tr><td>&#x02003;1&#x000A0;h</td><td>6.13<sup>b</sup></td><td>5.73<sup>c</sup></td><td>6.29<sup>a</sup></td><td>6.06<sup>b</sup></td><td>6.35<sup>a</sup></td><td>0.07</td><td>&#x0003C;.01</td></tr><tr><td>&#x02003;3&#x000A0;h</td><td>5.53<sup>d</sup></td><td>5.68<sup>c</sup></td><td>5.99<sup>a</sup></td><td>5.84<sup>b</sup></td><td>5.94<sup>a</sup></td><td>0.07</td><td>&#x0003C;.01</td></tr><tr><td>&#x02003;6&#x000A0;h</td><td>5.48<sup>b</sup></td><td>5.76<sup>a</sup></td><td>5.80<sup>a</sup></td><td>5.80<sup>a</sup></td><td>5.78<sup>a</sup></td><td>0.07</td><td>&#x0003C;.01</td></tr><tr><td>&#x02003;9&#x000A0;h</td><td>5.49<sup>c</sup></td><td>5.71<sup>b</sup></td><td>5.80<sup>a</sup></td><td>5.80<sup>a</sup></td><td>5.67<sup>bc</sup></td><td>0.07</td><td>&#x0003C;.01</td></tr><tr><td>&#x02003;12&#x000A0;h</td><td>5.49<sup>b</sup></td><td>5.71<sup>a</sup></td><td>5.75<sup>a</sup></td><td>5.75<sup>a</sup></td><td>5.66<sup>ab</sup></td><td>0.07</td><td>&#x0003C;.01</td></tr><tr><td>&#x02003;24&#x000A0;h</td><td>5.47<sup>b</sup></td><td>5.67<sup>a</sup></td><td>5.68<sup>a</sup></td><td>5.69<sup>a</sup></td><td>5.56<sup>a</sup></td><td>0.07</td><td>.02</td></tr><tr><td colspan="8">Muscle temperature, &#x000B0;C</td></tr><tr><td>&#x02003;1&#x000A0;h</td><td>37.42<sup>a</sup></td><td>35.33<sup>b</sup></td><td>36.36<sup>a</sup></td><td>38.25<sup>a</sup></td><td>38.75<sup>a</sup></td><td>0.61</td><td>&#x0003C;.01</td></tr><tr><td>&#x02003;3&#x000A0;h</td><td>27.83<sup>c</sup></td><td>24.99<sup>d</sup></td><td>27.91<sup>c</sup></td><td>31.31<sup>b</sup></td><td>33.09<sup>a</sup></td><td>0.61</td><td>&#x0003C;.01</td></tr><tr><td>&#x02003;6&#x000A0;h</td><td>16.51<sup>d</sup></td><td>15.58<sup>d</sup></td><td>19.58<sup>c</sup></td><td>23.12<sup>a</sup></td><td>22.17<sup>b</sup></td><td>0.61</td><td>&#x0003C;.01</td></tr><tr><td>&#x02003;9&#x000A0;h</td><td>10.19<sup>c</sup></td><td>11.47<sup>c</sup></td><td>13.51<sup>b</sup></td><td>16.37<sup>a</sup></td><td>14.99<sup>b</sup></td><td>0.61</td><td>&#x0003C;.01</td></tr><tr><td>&#x02003;12&#x000A0;h</td><td>7.01<sup>c</sup></td><td>7.58<sup>c</sup></td><td>10.00<sup>b</sup></td><td>12.42<sup>a</sup></td><td>11.27<sup>a</sup></td><td>0.61</td><td>&#x0003C;.01</td></tr><tr><td>&#x02003;24&#x000A0;h</td><td>4.00</td><td>4.21</td><td>4.87</td><td>5.13</td><td>4.90</td><td>0.61</td><td>.34</td></tr><tr><td colspan="8">Rate of pH decline<sup>1</sup></td></tr><tr><td>&#x02003;1&#x02013;3&#x000A0;h</td><td>0.304<sup>a</sup></td><td>0.046<sup>c</sup></td><td>0.195<sup>ab</sup></td><td>0.132<sup>bc</sup></td><td>0.206<sup>ab</sup></td><td>0.033</td><td>&#x0003C;.001</td></tr><tr><td>&#x02003;3&#x02013;6&#x000A0;h</td><td>0.029</td><td>0.035</td><td>0.070</td><td>0.041</td><td>0.073</td><td>0.023</td><td>.16</td></tr><tr><td>&#x02003;6&#x02013;9&#x000A0;h</td><td>0.006</td><td>0.030</td><td>0.023</td><td>0.010</td><td>0.043</td><td>0.017</td><td>.11</td></tr><tr><td>&#x02003;9&#x02013;12&#x000A0;h</td><td>0.005</td><td>0.011</td><td>0.024</td><td>0.019</td><td>0.013</td><td>0.007</td><td>.10</td></tr><tr><td>&#x02003;12&#x02013;24&#x000A0;h</td><td>0.002</td><td>0.007</td><td>0.005</td><td>0.009</td><td>0.007</td><td>0.005</td><td>.11</td></tr><tr><td>&#x02003;1&#x02013;24&#x000A0;h</td><td>0.030<sup>a</sup></td><td>0.001<sup>c</sup></td><td>0.028<sup>a</sup></td><td>0.018<sup>b</sup></td><td>0.034<sup>a</sup></td><td>0.005</td><td>&#x0003C;.001</td></tr><tr><td colspan="8">Rate of temperature decline<sup>2</sup></td></tr><tr><td>&#x02003;1&#x02013;3&#x000A0;h</td><td>4.76<sup>a</sup></td><td>5.13<sup>a</sup></td><td>4.19<sup>ab</sup></td><td>3.43<sup>bc</sup></td><td>2.79<sup>c</sup></td><td>0.71</td><td>&#x0003C;.01</td></tr><tr><td>&#x02003;3&#x02013;6&#x000A0;h</td><td>3.77<sup>a</sup></td><td>3.14<sup>ab</sup></td><td>2.78<sup>b</sup></td><td>2.73<sup>b</sup></td><td>3.64<sup>a</sup></td><td>0.23</td><td>&#x0003C;.01</td></tr><tr><td>&#x02003;6&#x02013;9&#x000A0;h</td><td>2.12<sup>a</sup></td><td>1.38<sup>b</sup></td><td>2.04<sup>a</sup></td><td>2.26<sup>a</sup></td><td>2.41<sup>a</sup></td><td>0.28</td><td>&#x0003C;.01</td></tr><tr><td>&#x02003;9&#x02013;12&#x000A0;h</td><td>1.06</td><td>1.30</td><td>1.17</td><td>1.32</td><td>1.24</td><td>0.12</td><td>.49</td></tr><tr><td>&#x02003;12&#x02013;24&#x000A0;h</td><td>0.25<sup>d</sup></td><td>0.28<sup>d</sup></td><td>0.43<sup>c</sup></td><td>0.61<sup>a</sup></td><td>0.53<sup>b</sup></td><td>0.03</td><td>&#x0003C;.01</td></tr><tr><td>&#x02003;1&#x02013;24&#x000A0;h</td><td>1.45<sup>a</sup></td><td>1.35<sup>c</sup></td><td>1.37<sup>bc</sup></td><td>1.44<sup>ab</sup></td><td>1.47<sup>a</sup></td><td>0.03</td><td>&#x0003C;.01</td></tr><tr><td colspan="8">Instrumental color</td></tr><tr><td>&#x02003;<italic>L*</italic></td><td>55.88<sup>a</sup></td><td>48.66<sup>b</sup></td><td>54.42<sup>a</sup></td><td>45.57<sup>b</sup></td><td>52.70<sup>a</sup></td><td>1.06</td><td>&#x0003C;.01</td></tr><tr><td>&#x02003;<italic>a*</italic></td><td>5.56<sup>c</sup></td><td>14.84<sup>a</sup></td><td>10.42<sup>b</sup></td><td>10.97<sup>b</sup></td><td>6.96<sup>c</sup></td><td>0.67</td><td>&#x0003C;.01</td></tr><tr><td>&#x02003;<italic>b*</italic></td><td>15.30<sup>b</sup></td><td>17.23<sup>a</sup></td><td>16.94<sup>a</sup></td><td>13.80<sup>c</sup></td><td>15.15<sup>bc</sup></td><td>0.51</td><td>&#x0003C;.01</td></tr><tr><td>Drip loss, %</td><td>6.70<sup>a</sup></td><td>0.93<sup>c</sup></td><td>1.47<sup>c</sup></td><td>1.16<sup>c</sup></td><td>3.81<sup>b</sup></td><td>0.37</td><td>&#x0003C;.01</td></tr><tr><td colspan="8">Proximate composition</td></tr><tr><td>&#x02003;Moisture content, %</td><td>73.34<sup>a</sup></td><td>74.27<sup>a</sup></td><td>69.43<sup>b</sup></td><td>74.94<sup>a</sup></td><td>73.06<sup>a</sup></td><td>0.55</td><td>&#x0003C;.01</td></tr><tr><td>&#x02003;IMF content, %</td><td>1.75<sup>b</sup></td><td>1.65<sup>b</sup></td><td>10.29<sup>a</sup></td><td>3.17<sup>b</sup></td><td>3.14<sup>b</sup></td><td>0.59</td><td>&#x0003C;.01</td></tr></tbody></table><table-wrap-foot><fn><p>GM, <italic>gluteus medius</italic>; IMF, intramuscular fat; LT, <italic>longissimus thoracis</italic>; PM, <italic>psoas major</italic>; SEM, standard error of mean; ST, <italic>semitendinosus</italic>; TB, <italic>triceps brachii</italic>.</p></fn><fn><label><sup>a&#x02013;d</sup></label><p>Least-squares means with different superscripts in each row (i.e.,&#x000A0;effect of muscle) are significantly different (<italic>P</italic>&#x02009;&#x0003C;&#x02009;.05).</p></fn><fn><label><sup>1</sup></label><p>Rate of pH decline was calculated as the change of pH/h.</p></fn><fn><label><sup>2</sup></label><p>Rate of temperature decline was calculated as the change of temperature/h.</p></fn></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap><fig id="f3"><label>Figure 3.</label><caption><p>The rate and extent of (A)&#x000A0;pH decline and (B)&#x000A0;temperature decline during the first 24-h postmortem in 5 pork muscles. Interaction between muscle and time was significant (<italic>P</italic>&#x02009;&#x0003C;&#x02009;.01) for pH and temperature. GM, <italic>gluteus medius</italic>; LT, <italic>longissimus thoracis</italic>; PM, <italic>psoas major</italic>; ST, <italic>semitendinosus</italic>; TB, <italic>triceps brachii</italic>.</p></caption><graphic xlink:href="3.png"/></fig><p>The pH of PM muscle declined the fastest (occurring before the first measurements in this study occurred at 1-h postmortem) among the muscles evaluated in this study (this will be discussed at length in the subsequent section). The LT muscle demonstrated a faster (<italic>P</italic>&#x02009;&#x0003C;&#x02009;.05) rate of pH decline from 1-h to 3-h postmortem compared with the TB and PM muscles, while no differences (<italic>P</italic>&#x02009;&#x0003E;&#x02009;.05) in the rate of pH decline at other time periods (3&#x02013;6h, 6&#x02013;9&#x000A0;h, 9&#x02013;12&#x000A0;h, and 12&#x02013;24&#x000A0;h) were observed among muscles. Overall (1&#x02013;24&#x000A0;h postmortem), the LT, ST, and GM muscles had similar rates of pH decline, which were greater (<italic>P</italic>&#x02009;&#x0003C;&#x02009;.05) than the TB muscle, while all muscles had faster (<italic>P</italic>&#x02009;&#x0003C;&#x02009;.05) rates of pH decline compared with the PM muscle. Muscle-specific differences (<italic>P</italic>&#x02009;&#x0003C;&#x02009;.01) in temperature decline were observed for all measured time points, except between the 9-h to 12-h postmortem period (<italic>P</italic>&#x02009;=&#x02009;.49). Overall, when comparing the rate of temperature decline from 1&#x000A0;h to 24&#x000A0;h, the LT and GM muscles had a faster (<italic>P</italic>&#x02009;&#x0003C;&#x02009;.05) rate of temperature decline compared with the PM and ST muscles.</p><p>The rate of pH decline is driven by&#x02014;and a result of&#x02014;adenosine triphosphate (ATP) hydrolysis, while ultimate pH is largely determined by the muscle glycogen reserves available at the time of slaughter (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r36">Matarneh et&#x000A0;al., 2021</xref>). Muscle fiber composition plays a critical role in the rate and extent of pH decline. Glycolytic muscle fibers, characterized by greater adenosine triphosphatase (ATPase) activity, elevated levels of glycolytic enzymes, and a more extensive sarcoplasmic reticulum, predominantly undergo glycolytic metabolism. Consequently, glycolytic muscle fibers may exhibit more rapid rates of ATP hydrolysis and pH decline during the early postmortem period compared with oxidative fibers, which primarily rely on oxidative metabolism. Results from this study indicated that the LT muscle underwent a faster rate (<italic>P</italic>&#x02009;&#x0003C;&#x02009;.05) of pH decline than the TB muscle, especially during the first 3&#x000A0;h of the postmortem period. Rates of pH decline were intermediate for the ST and GM muscles compared with the LT and TB muscles. The PM muscle experienced the slowest and lowest extent of pH decline (<italic>P</italic>&#x02009;&#x0003C;&#x02009;.05) among the muscles studied in this study (this will be discussed at length in the subsequent section).</p><p>The LT, GM, and ST muscles contain predominantly glycolytic type IIB muscle fibers with a low percentage of oxidative type I and type IIA muscle fibers, whereas the TB muscle contains a greater percentage of oxidative type I and type IIA muscle fibers (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r37">Melody et&#x000A0;al., 2004</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r14">Christensen et&#x000A0;al., 2004</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r24">Karlsson et&#x000A0;al., 1999</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r32">LeMaster et&#x000A0;al., 2024</xref>). The greater abundance of glycolytic type IIB muscle fibers in the LT, GM, and ST muscles allowed for a more rapid depletion of glycogen reserves, and a faster progression through the phases of rigor, which accounted for their faster rate of pH decline compared with the more oxidative TB muscle. Moreover, the LT muscle demonstrated the lowest ultimate pH among the 5 muscles analyzed in this study. Similarly, Bohrer et&#x000A0;al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r6">2024</xref>) reported that the LT muscle demonstrated the lowest ultimate pH among 9 pork muscles, including the TB, ST, <italic>serratus ventralis</italic>, <italic>biceps femoris</italic>, <italic>semimembranosus</italic>, <italic>adductor</italic>, <italic>rectus femoris</italic>, and <italic>vastus lateralis</italic> muscles.</p><p>In contrast to the other muscles evaluated in this study, including the glycolytic LT and GM muscles, the oxidative PM muscle demonstrated the lowest (<italic>P</italic>&#x02009;&#x0003C;&#x02009;.05) pH at 1-h postmortem (pH&#x02009;=&#x02009;5.73) compared with all other muscles evaluated. However, the pH of the PM muscle at 12-h and 24-h postmortem (pH&#x02009;=&#x02009;5.71 and 5.67, respectively) was not different (<italic>P</italic>&#x02009;&#x0003E;&#x02009;.05) compared with the ST, TB, and GM muscles and was actually greater (<italic>P</italic>&#x02009;&#x0003C;&#x02009;.05) than the LT muscle. This demonstrates that the majority of the pH decline in the PM muscle occurred within the first hour postmortem. A similar observation was documented by Melody et&#x000A0;al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r37">2004</xref>), Lefaucheur (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r31">2010</xref>), and Zhang et&#x000A0;al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r58">2013</xref>), all of whom reported that the PM muscle had a lower pH at 1-h postmortem and a greater pH at 24-h postmortem compared with the LTL muscle. The low pH at 1-h postmortem in the PM muscle could be due to its limited glycogen reserves at slaughter, which are nearly depleted within the first hour postmortem, thereby restricting postmortem glycolysis and pH decline, ultimately leading to its relatively high pH at 24-h postmortem. Moreover, upon ATP depletion, the impaired calcium ATPase pump in the sarcoplasmic reticulum may have resulted in a cytosolic calcium overload, which could have been subsequently sequestered by mitochondria. Calcium overload in the mitochondria has been shown to induce the translocation of H<sup>+</sup> from the matrix to the intermembrane space, facilitating ATP hydrolysis (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r35">Matarneh et&#x000A0;al., 2023</xref>). The lower membrane integrity and greater permeability of the mitochondrial membrane in the PM muscle compared with other muscles could allow for a greater rate of ATP hydrolysis (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r57">Zhang et&#x000A0;al., 2020</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="sec3.2"><title>Instrumental color</title><p>Instrumental color of each muscle was evaluated on day 1 postmortem. Muscle influenced (<italic>P</italic>&#x02009;&#x0003C;&#x02009;.01) <italic>L*</italic> (lightness), <italic>a*</italic> (redness), and <italic>b*</italic> (yellowness). Pork LT, ST, and GM muscles demonstrated greater (<italic>P</italic>&#x02009;&#x0003C;&#x02009;.05) <italic>L*</italic> than PM and TB muscles. The PM muscle exhibited the greatest (<italic>P</italic>&#x02009;&#x0003C;&#x02009;.05) <italic>a*</italic>, while <italic>a*</italic> of the ST and TB muscles were at intermediate levels compared with other muscles, and the LT and GM muscles had the lowest (<italic>P</italic>&#x02009;&#x0003C;&#x02009;.05) <italic>a*</italic>. The PM and ST muscles had greater (<italic>P</italic>&#x02009;&#x0003C;&#x02009;.05) <italic>b*</italic> compared with other muscles, while the LT muscle had greater (<italic>P</italic>&#x02009;&#x0003C;&#x02009;.05) <italic>b*</italic> compared with the TB muscle.</p><p>Muscle-specific variation in pork color has been well documented by several previous studies. For instance, Brewer et&#x000A0;al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r8">2001</xref>), Arkfeld et&#x000A0;al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r2">2016</xref>), and Bohrer et&#x000A0;al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r6">2024</xref>) suggested that pork loin (LTL muscle) exhibited greater lightness, lower redness, and greater yellowness compared with ham muscles, including the ST, GM, <italic>biceps femoris</italic>, <italic>semimembranosus</italic>, <italic>adductor</italic>, <italic>rectus femoris</italic>, and <italic>vastus lateralis</italic> muscles as well as shoulder muscles, such as the TB and <italic>serratus ventralis</italic> muscles. Moreover, Barkley et&#x000A0;al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r3">2023</xref>) reported that the LTL muscle demonstrated lower oxygen consumption rates, greater metmyoglobin reducing activity, and greater color stability than the TB or PM muscles during retail display. Color differences among pork muscles could be largely attributed to the variation in muscle fiber types, which influence myoglobin content, mitochondrial functionality, pH, and water-holding capacity. Oxidative muscle fibers contain greater concentrations of myoglobin and mitochondria for aerobic metabolism and generate more energy than glycolytic muscle fibers. Particularly, myoglobin content has been shown to strongly relate to the red pigmentation of pork (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r25">Kim et&#x000A0;al., 2010</xref>). Therefore, muscles with a greater proportion of glycolytic type IIB muscle fibers and a lower proportion of oxidative type I muscle fibers tend to exhibit greater lightness and lower redness, often resulting in a &#x0201C;pale&#x0201D; appearance. This characteristic aligns with the findings of this study, where the LT, ST, and GM muscles&#x02014;predominantly composed of glycolytic type IIB muscle fibers&#x02014;demonstrated greater lightness and lower redness compared with the PM and TB muscles, which contain a greater proportion of oxidative type I fibers.</p><p>Stepwise regression analysis was conducted to predict the instrumental color of each individual muscle using pH and temperature at different time points during the early postmortem process (data presented in supplementary tables). For the LT muscle, pH at 1-h postmortem explained the greatest variation (<italic>R</italic><sup>2</sup>&#x02009;=&#x02009;0.61) in <italic>L*</italic> (measured at 1-d postmortem), while temperature at 6-h postmortem explained the greatest variation (<italic>R</italic><sup>2</sup>&#x02009;=&#x02009;0.43) in <italic>L*</italic> (measured at 1-d postmortem). For the PM and GM muscles, pH at 24-h postmortem explained the greatest variation in <italic>a*</italic> (measured at 1-d postmortem; <italic>R</italic><sup>2</sup>&#x02009;=&#x02009;0.33 and <italic>R</italic><sup>2</sup>&#x02009;=&#x02009;0.24, respectively). For the TB muscle, pH at 24-h postmortem explained the greatest variation in <italic>L*</italic> (measured at 1-d postmortem; <italic>R</italic><sup>2</sup>&#x02009;=&#x02009;0.23). These findings suggested that the relationship among color (measured at 1-d postmortem), rate and extent of pH decline, and rate of temperature decline appears to differ among muscles.</p></sec><sec id="sec3.3"><title>Drip loss and proximate composition</title><p>Drip loss was influenced (<italic>P</italic>&#x02009;&#x0003C;&#x02009;.01) by muscle. The LT muscle had the greatest (<italic>P</italic>&#x02009;&#x0003C;&#x02009;.05) drip loss, whereas the PM, ST, and TB muscles exhibited the lowest (<italic>P</italic>&#x02009;&#x0003C;&#x02009;.05) drip loss. Drip loss for the GM muscle differed (<italic>P</italic>&#x02009;&#x0003C;&#x02009;.05) when compared with all other muscles and was at intermediate levels compared with the LT muscle and the PM, ST, and TB muscles. Variation in water-holding capacity is known to be attributed to the differences in the rate and extent of pH decline, degradation of intermediate filament proteins (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r37">Melody et&#x000A0;al., 2004</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r23">Johnson et&#x000A0;al., 2023</xref>), and protein oxidation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r33">Lund et&#x000A0;al., 2007</xref>). The current study evaluated the differences in the rate and extent of pH decline and proteolysis among the muscles, which are likely responsible for the observed variation in drip loss. In the current study, the lower ultimate pH observed in the LT and GM muscles (approximately 0.2&#x000A0;U and 0.1&#x000A0;U lower, respectively) compared with the PM, ST, and TB muscles likely contributed to their reduced water-holding capacity, as evidenced by greater levels of drip loss. Similarly, Warner et&#x000A0;al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r53">1993</xref>) compared pork quality characteristics of 10 muscles and documented greater levels of exudate in the LTL, GM, and ST muscles compared with the PM and TB muscles. Melody et&#x000A0;al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r37">2004</xref>) and LeMaster et&#x000A0;al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r32">2024</xref>) reported that the LTL muscle exhibited greater levels of drip loss and purge loss compared with the PM muscle.</p><p>Stepwise regression analysis suggested that pH at 1-h postmortem accounted for the greatest variation in drip loss (<italic>R</italic><sup>2</sup>&#x02009;=&#x02009;0.50) for the ST muscle (data presented in supplementary tables). For the LT muscle, pH at 6-h postmortem explained the greatest variation in drip loss (<italic>R</italic><sup>2</sup>&#x02009;=&#x02009;0.30), while temperature at 1-h postmortem explained the greatest variation in drip loss (<italic>R</italic><sup>2</sup>&#x02009;=&#x02009;0.32). In contrast, pH and temperature at other measured time points explained less than 30% of variation in drip loss for other muscles (<italic>R</italic><sup>2</sup>&#x02009;&#x0003C;&#x02009;0.30). It is worth noting that pH at specific temperatures during the early postmortem period may be a more meaningful predictor of drip loss when compared with pH at specific time points during the early postmortem period. For instance, Dorleku et&#x000A0;al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r15">2025</xref>) suggested that pH at 36&#x000B0;C explained 27.5% of the variability in purge loss of the pork LT muscle.</p><p>The ST muscle had the greatest IMF (<italic>P</italic>&#x02009;&#x0003C;&#x02009;.05; approximately 10.29%) and the lowest moisture content (<italic>P</italic>&#x02009;&#x0003C;&#x02009;.05; approximately 69.43%) compared with the other muscles. Consistent with our findings, Kim et&#x000A0;al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r27">2008</xref>) reported the ST muscle demonstrated the greatest IMF, followed by the TB, GM, and LT muscles.</p></sec><sec id="sec3.4"><title>Warner-Bratzler shear force and cooking loss</title><p>Interactions were observed for WBSF between postmortem aging day and endpoint cooking temperature (<italic>P</italic>&#x02009;=&#x02009;.02) as well as between muscle and endpoint cooking temperature (<italic>P</italic>&#x02009;&#x0003C;&#x02009;.01; <xref ref-type="table" rid="tab2">Table&#x000A0;2</xref>). While WBSF decreased when extending postmortem aging from 1 d to 10 d and with a reduction in the endpoint cooking temperature from 71&#x000B0;C to 63&#x000B0;C, the numerical change for WBSF by lowering endpoint cooking temperature was less for samples aged 10 d (&#x00394;&#x02009;=&#x02009;0.35&#x000A0;kg) compared with samples aged for 1 or 3 d (&#x00394;&#x02009;=&#x02009;0.54&#x000A0;kg and &#x00394;&#x02009;=&#x02009;0.55&#x000A0;kg, respectively; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4">Figure&#x000A0;4A</xref>). This indicated that reducing endpoint cooking temperature from 71&#x000B0;C to 63&#x000B0;C played a more critical role for pork aged for 1-d or 3-d postmortem compared with those subjected to 10 d of aging. Moreover, different muscles demonstrated varying levels of reduction in WBSF in response to the reduction of endpoint cooking temperature from 71&#x000B0;C to 63&#x000B0;C (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f5">Figure&#x000A0;5A</xref>). As the endpoint cooking temperature was reduced from 71&#x000B0;C to 63&#x000B0;C, the GM muscle experienced the greatest levels of numerical change in WBSF values (&#x00394;&#x02009;=&#x02009;0.71&#x000A0;kg), while the LT and TB muscles exhibited the lowest levels of numerical change in WBSF values (&#x00394;&#x02009;=&#x02009;0.28&#x000A0;kg and &#x00394;&#x02009;=&#x02009;0.27&#x000A0;kg, respectively), and the PM and ST muscles were intermediate (&#x00394;&#x02009;=&#x02009;0.59&#x000A0;kg and &#x00394;&#x02009;=&#x02009;0.55&#x000A0;kg, respectively). This suggested that lowering the endpoint cooking temperature had a greater impact on the instrumental tenderness of the GM compared with other pork muscles.</p><table-wrap id="tab2"><label>Table 2.</label><caption><p>Influence of postmortem aging days and endpoint cook temperature on Warner-Bratzler shear force and cooking loss of 5 pork muscles</p></caption><table frame="hsides" rules="groups"><colgroup><col align="left"/><col align="center"/><col align="center"/><col align="center"/><col align="center"/><col align="center"/><col align="center"/><col align="center"/><col align="center"/><col align="center"/></colgroup><thead><tr><th>Characteristics</th><th>Aging, d</th><th>Cook Temp, &#x000B0;C</th><th align="center">LT</th><th align="center">PM</th><th align="center">ST</th><th align="center">TB</th><th align="center">GM</th><th colspan="2" align="center"><italic>P</italic> Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td rowspan="7">WBSF, kg</td><td rowspan="2">1</td><td>63</td><td>2.44<sup>ab,yz</sup></td><td>1.82<sup>c,yz</sup></td><td>1.96<sup>bc,z</sup></td><td>2.28<sup>abc</sup></td><td>2.56<sup>a,yz</sup></td><td>Muscle</td><td>&#x0003C;.01</td></tr><tr><td>71</td><td>2.72<sup>b,y</sup></td><td>2.33<sup>c,x</sup></td><td>2.70<sup>b,y</sup></td><td>2.54<sup>b</sup></td><td>3.46<sup>a,w</sup></td><td>Aging</td><td>&#x0003C;.01</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="2">3</td><td>63</td><td>2.28<sup>a,yz</sup></td><td>1.72<sup>b,yz</sup></td><td>1.74<sup>b,z</sup></td><td>2.15<sup>ab</sup></td><td>2.49<sup>a,yz</sup></td><td>Cook temp</td><td>&#x0003C;.01</td></tr><tr><td>71</td><td>2.72<sup>ab,y</sup></td><td>2.40<sup>b,x</sup></td><td>2.37<sup>b,y</sup></td><td>2.53<sup>b</sup></td><td>3.11<sup>a,wx</sup></td><td>Muscle&#x02009;&#x000D7;&#x02009;cook temp</td><td>&#x0003C;.01</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="2">10</td><td>63</td><td>2.11<sup>ab,z</sup></td><td>1.61<sup>b,z</sup></td><td>1.94<sup>ab,z</sup></td><td>2.05<sup>ab</sup></td><td>2.32<sup>a,z</sup></td><td>Aging&#x02009;&#x000D7;&#x02009;cook temp</td><td>.02</td></tr><tr><td>71</td><td>2.25<sup>b,yz</sup></td><td>2.20<sup>b,xy</sup></td><td>2.21<sup>b,yz</sup></td><td>2.21<sup>b</sup></td><td>2.93<sup>a,xy</sup></td><td>Muscle&#x02009;&#x000D7;&#x02009;aging</td><td>.21</td></tr><tr><td colspan="7"/><td>Muscle&#x02009;&#x000D7;&#x02009;aging&#x02009;&#x000D7;&#x02009;cook temp</td><td>.37</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="7">Cooking loss, %</td><td rowspan="2">1</td><td>63</td><td>9.38<sup>b,z</sup></td><td>14.59<sup>a,z</sup></td><td>16.28<sup>a,z</sup></td><td>15.49<sup>a,z</sup></td><td>17.45<sup>a,yz</sup></td><td>Muscle</td><td>&#x0003C;.01</td></tr><tr><td>71</td><td>12.64<sup>b,yz</sup></td><td>19.38<sup>a,y</sup></td><td>21.42<sup>a,y</sup></td><td>19.02<sup>a,yz</sup></td><td>20.45<sup>a,y</sup></td><td>Aging</td><td>.97</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="2">3</td><td>63</td><td>9.10<sup>b,z</sup></td><td>13.19<sup>ab,z</sup></td><td>16.63<sup>a,z</sup></td><td>14.71<sup>a,z</sup></td><td>15.92<sup>a,z</sup></td><td>Cook temp</td><td>&#x0003C;.01</td></tr><tr><td>71</td><td>15.57<sup>b,y</sup></td><td>19.35<sup>a,y</sup></td><td>21.62<sup>a,y</sup></td><td>19.26<sup>a,yz</sup></td><td>21.26<sup>a,y</sup></td><td>Muscle&#x02009;&#x000D7;&#x02009;cook temp</td><td>.35</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="2">10</td><td>63</td><td>10.10<sup>b,z</sup></td><td>12.23<sup>b,z</sup></td><td>16.32<sup>a,z</sup></td><td>15.44<sup>a,z</sup></td><td>15.04<sup>a,z</sup></td><td>Aging&#x02009;&#x000D7;&#x02009;cook temp</td><td>.02</td></tr><tr><td>71</td><td>14.86<sup>b,y</sup></td><td>19.39<sup>a,y</sup></td><td>22.52<sup>a,y</sup></td><td>20.59<sup>a,yz</sup></td><td>20.42<sup>a,y</sup></td><td>Muscle&#x02009;&#x000D7;&#x02009;aging</td><td>.19</td></tr><tr><td colspan="7"/><td>Muscle&#x02009;&#x000D7;&#x02009;aging&#x02009;&#x000D7;&#x02009;cook temp</td><td>.88</td></tr></tbody></table><table-wrap-foot><fn><p>Aging, postmortem aging days, aging; cook temp, cooking temperature; GM, <italic>gluteus medius</italic>; LT, <italic>longissimus thoracis</italic>; PM, <italic>psoas major</italic>; ST, <italic>semitendinosus</italic>; TB, <italic>triceps brachii</italic>; WBSF, Warner-Bratzler shear force.</p></fn><fn><label><sup>a&#x02013;c</sup></label><p>Least-squares means with different superscripts in each row (i.e.,&#x000A0;effect of muscle for each aging time and endpoint cooking temperature) are significantly different (<italic>P</italic>&#x02009;&#x0003C;&#x02009;.05).</p></fn><fn><label><sup>w&#x02013;z</sup></label><p>Least-squares means with different superscripts in each column (i.e.,&#x000A0;effect of aging time and endpoint cooking temperature for each individual muscle) are significantly different (<italic>P</italic>&#x02009;&#x0003C;&#x02009;.05).</p></fn></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap><fig id="f4"><label>Figure 4.</label><caption><p>Influence of endpoint cooking temperature (63&#x000B0;C, 71&#x000B0;C) and postmortem aging days (1 d, 3 d, and 10 d) on (A)&#x000A0;WBSF (kg) and (B)&#x000A0;cooking loss (%) of pork muscles. Interaction between endpoint cooking temperature and muscle was significant (<italic>P</italic>&#x02009;&#x0003C;&#x02009;.05) for WBSF (SEM&#x02009;=&#x02009;0.09) and cooking loss (SEM&#x02009;=&#x02009;0.74). <sup>a&#x02013;d</sup>Least-squares means with different superscripts (i.e.,&#x000A0;effect of aging time&#x02009;&#x000D7;&#x02009;endpoint cooking temperature) are significantly different (<italic>P</italic>&#x02009;&#x0003C;&#x02009;.05). &#x00394; was calculated as the difference between least-squares means of WBSF or cooking loss values at different endpoint cooking temperatures for each postmortem aging day. SEM, standard error of mean; WBSF, Warner-Bratzler shear force.</p></caption><graphic xlink:href="4.png"/></fig><fig id="f5"><label>Figure 5.</label><caption><p>Influence of endpoint cooking temperature (63&#x000B0;C, 71&#x000B0;C) on (A)&#x000A0;WBSF (kg), (B)&#x000A0;sensory tenderness, (C)&#x000A0;sensory juiciness, (D)&#x000A0;sensory chewiness, and (E)&#x000A0;sensory flavor of 5 pork muscles.<sup>1</sup> There were significant (<italic>P</italic>&#x02009;&#x0003C;&#x02009;.01) main effects for muscle and cooking temperature for each attribute. The interaction between endpoint cooking temperature and muscle was significant (<italic>P</italic>&#x02009;&#x0003C;&#x02009;.01) for WBSF (SEM&#x02009;=&#x02009;0.10), sensory tenderness (SEM&#x02009;=&#x02009;0.56), and sensory juiciness (SEM&#x02009;=&#x02009;0.47). The interaction between endpoint cooking temperature and muscle was not significant for sensory chewiness (<italic>P</italic>&#x02009;=&#x02009;.26; SEM&#x02009;=&#x02009;0.60) and sensory flavor (<italic>P</italic>&#x02009;=&#x02009;.19; SEM&#x02009;=&#x02009;0.32). &#x00394; was calculated as the difference between the least-squares means of WBSF, sensory tenderness, or sensory juiciness values at different endpoint cooking temperatures for each muscle. <sup>a&#x02013;e</sup>Least-squares means with different superscripts (i.e.,&#x000A0;effect of muscle&#x02009;&#x000D7;&#x02009;endpoint cooking temperature) are significantly different (<italic>P</italic>&#x02009;&#x0003C;&#x02009;.05). <sup>1</sup>Evaluated on 15-point scale, where 0&#x02009;=&#x02009;very tough, very dry, not chewy, or no flavor, and 15&#x02009;=&#x02009;very tender, very juicy, very chewy, or very flavorful. GM, <italic>gluteus medius</italic>; LT, <italic>longissimus thoracis</italic>; PM, <italic>psoas major</italic>; SEM, standard error of mean; ST, <italic>semitendinosus</italic>; TB, <italic>triceps brachii</italic>; WBSF, Warner-Bratzler shear force.</p></caption><graphic xlink:href="5.png"/></fig><p>Cooking loss was influenced by muscle (<italic>P</italic>&#x02009;&#x0003C;&#x02009;.01), and the interaction between postmortem aging days and endpoint cooking temperature (<italic>P</italic>&#x02009;=&#x02009;.02). The greatest (<italic>P</italic>&#x02009;&#x0003C;&#x02009;.05) level of cooking loss was observed in the ST and GM muscles, while the LT muscle exhibited the lowest (<italic>P</italic>&#x02009;&#x0003C;&#x02009;.05) level of cooking loss compared with all other muscles. Similar to WBSF, the magnitude of change in cooking loss caused by endpoint cooking temperature varied across different postmortem aging days. Specifically, decreasing the endpoint cooking temperature from 71&#x000B0;C to 63&#x000B0;C contributed to a greater level of numerical change for cooking loss in muscles subjected to 3 d and 10 d of postmortem aging (&#x00394;&#x02009;=&#x02009;5.50% and &#x00394;&#x02009;=&#x02009;5.73%, respectively) compared with those aged for 1-d postmortem (&#x00394;&#x02009;=&#x02009;3.94%; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4">Figure&#x000A0;4B</xref>).</p><p>In agreement with our results, numerous research studies have concluded that pork cooked to greater endpoint cooking temperatures exhibited greater WBSF and cooking loss (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r47">Rincker et&#x000A0;al., 2008</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r9">Bryan et&#x000A0;al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r17">Gaffield et&#x000A0;al., 2020</xref>). Muscle-specific differences in pork tenderness observed in this study could be primarily attributed to variations in muscle fiber composition (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r26">Kim et&#x000A0;al., 2013</xref>), collagen content and solubility (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r45">Rhee et&#x000A0;al., 2004</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r59">&#x0017B;ochowska et&#x000A0;al., 2005</xref>), IMF (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r41">Nishimura, 2010</xref>), sarcomere length (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r55">Wheeler et&#x000A0;al., 2000</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r54">Warner et&#x000A0;al., 2021</xref>), and the extent of proteolysis (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r40">Muroya et&#x000A0;al., 2010</xref>). These structural and biochemical characteristics influence thermal stability (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r32">LeMaster et&#x000A0;al., 2024</xref>), muscle fiber shrinkage (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r52">Vaskoska, 2020</xref>), and connective tissue behavior during cooking (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r52">Vaskoska et&#x000A0;al., 2020</xref>), ultimately leading to differences in WBSF among muscles.</p></sec><sec id="sec3.5"><title>Postmortem protein degradation and calpain-1 autolysis</title><p>An effect (<italic>P</italic>&#x02009;&#x0003C;&#x02009;.01) of muscle was observed for unautolyzed calpain-1 (80 kDa), partially autolyzed calpain-1 (78 kDa), and fully autolyzed calpain-1 (76 kDa; <xref ref-type="table" rid="tab3">Table&#x000A0;3</xref>). The PM and ST muscles exhibited a greater proportion (<italic>P</italic>&#x02009;&#x0003C;&#x02009;.05) of unautolyzed calpain-1 (80 kDa) compared with the LT and GM muscles, with the TB muscle demonstrating an intermediate level. The ST and TB muscles had greater proportion (<italic>P</italic>&#x02009;&#x0003C;&#x02009;.05) of partially autolyzed calpain-1 (78 kDa) compared with the LT and GM muscles, while the PM was at an intermediate level. Moreover, the LT and GM muscles demonstrated greater proportion (<italic>P</italic>&#x02009;&#x0003C;&#x02009;.05) of fully autolyzed calpain-1 (76 kDa) compared with the PM, ST, and TB muscles. This suggested that LT and GM muscles exhibited greater extent of calpain-1 autolysis at (and prior to) 24-h postmortem compared with the PM, ST, and TB muscles.</p><table-wrap id="tab3"><label>Table 3.</label><caption><p>Relative proportion of calpain-1 autolysis in 5 pork muscles at 24-h postmortem</p></caption><table frame="hsides" rules="groups"><colgroup><col align="left" width="11*"/><col align="center" width="12*"/><col align="center" width="11*"/><col align="center" width="12*"/><col align="center" width="12*"/><col align="center" width="12*"/><col align="center" width="12*"/><col align="center" width="12*"/></colgroup><thead><tr><th>Values<sup>1</sup>, kDa (%)</th><th align="center">LT</th><th align="center">PM</th><th align="center">ST</th><th align="center">TB</th><th align="center">GM</th><th align="center">SEM</th><th align="center"><italic>P</italic> Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>80</td><td>9.48<sup>b</sup></td><td>22.04<sup>a</sup></td><td>22.11<sup>a</sup></td><td>15.72<sup>ab</sup></td><td>12.12<sup>b</sup></td><td>3.61</td><td>&#x0003C;.01</td></tr><tr><td>78</td><td>42.07<sup>b</sup></td><td>45.10<sup>ab</sup></td><td>49.88<sup>a</sup></td><td>49.74<sup>a</sup></td><td>42.56<sup>b</sup></td><td>1.61</td><td>&#x0003C;.01</td></tr><tr><td>76</td><td>48.41<sup>a</sup></td><td>32.83<sup>b</sup></td><td>27.96<sup>b</sup></td><td>34.49<sup>b</sup></td><td>45.28<sup>a</sup></td><td>4.70</td><td>&#x0003C;.01</td></tr></tbody></table><table-wrap-foot><fn><p>GM, gluteus medius; LT, longissimus thoracis; PM, psoas major; SEM, standard error of mean; ST, semitendinosus; TB, triceps brachii.</p></fn><fn><label><sup>a,b</sup></label><p>Least-squares means with different letters in each row (i.e.,&#x000A0;effect of muscle) are significantly different (<italic>P</italic>&#x02009;&#x0003C;&#x02009;.05).</p></fn><fn><label><sup>1</sup></label><p>Values are expressed as a percentage of the catalytic subunit present as the unautolyzed (80 kDa) form or the autolysis products (78 and 76 kDa) of the catalytic subunit of calpain-1.</p></fn></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap><p>An interaction (<italic>P</italic>&#x02009;&#x0003C;&#x02009;.05) between muscle and postmortem aging time was observed for desmin (and its degradation products) and troponin-T (and its degradation products; <xref ref-type="table" rid="tab4">Table&#x000A0;4</xref>). This indicated that the extent of proteolysis varied among muscles, as evidenced by differential changes in the abundance of intact desmin (55 kDa), desmin degradation products (42 kDa and 38 kDa), intact troponin-T (37 kDa), and troponin-T degradation products (30 kDa and 28 kDa) during postmortem aging. The ST and TB muscles exhibited a greater abundance (<italic>P</italic>&#x02009;&#x0003C;&#x02009;.05) of intact desmin (55 kDa) compared with the LT, PM, and GM muscles at both 1-d and 10-d postmortem. Moreover, the ST and TB muscles demonstrated limited changes (<italic>P</italic>&#x02009;&#x0003E;&#x02009;.05) in intact desmin (55 kDa) and desmin degradation products (42 kDa and 38 kDa) during postmortem aging. In contrast, the LT, GM, and PM muscles exhibited a decrease (<italic>P</italic>&#x02009;&#x0003C;&#x02009;.05) in the abundance of intact desmin (55 kDa) and an increase (<italic>P</italic>&#x02009;&#x0003C;&#x02009;.05) in the abundance of desmin degradation product (38 kDa) between 1-d and 10-d postmortem aging.</p><table-wrap id="tab4"><label>Table 4.</label><caption><p>Influence of postmortem aging days on degradation of desmin and troponin-T of 5 pork muscles</p></caption><table frame="hsides" rules="groups"><colgroup><col width="12*"/><col align="center" width="9*"/><col align="center" width="9*"/><col align="center" width="9*"/><col align="center" width="9*"/><col align="center" width="9*"/><col align="center" width="9*"/><col align="center" width="9*"/><col align="center" width="9*"/><col align="center" width="9*"/></colgroup><thead><tr><th rowspan="3">Values<sup>1</sup>, kDa</th><th colspan="7" align="center">Interaction Effect</th><th colspan="2" rowspan="3" align="center"><italic>P</italic> Value</th></tr><tr><th rowspan="2" align="center">Aging, d</th><th colspan="5" align="center">Muscle</th><th/></tr><tr><th align="center">LT</th><th align="center">PM</th><th align="center">ST</th><th align="center">TB</th><th align="center">GM</th><th align="center">SEM</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td rowspan="3">Desmin intact 55</td><td>1</td><td>1.22<sup>d</sup></td><td>2.12<sup>bc</sup></td><td>3.24<sup>a</sup></td><td>2.94<sup>a</sup></td><td>2.02<sup>c</sup></td><td>0.17</td><td>Muscle</td><td>&#x0003C;.01</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>0.31<sup>e</sup></td><td>1.16<sup>d</sup></td><td>2.84<sup>ab</sup></td><td>2.55<sup>a&#x02013;c</sup></td><td>1.00<sup>de</sup></td><td/><td>Aging</td><td>&#x0003C;.01</td></tr><tr><td>&#x00394;<sup>2</sup></td><td>0.91</td><td>0.96</td><td>0.40</td><td>0.39</td><td>1.02</td><td/><td>Muscle &#x000D7; aging</td><td>&#x0003C;.01</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="3">Desmin degradation 42</td><td>1</td><td>0.36<sup>ab</sup></td><td>0.25<sup>b&#x02013;d</sup></td><td>0.06<sup>d</sup></td><td>0.07<sup>d</sup></td><td>0.38<sup>ab</sup></td><td>0.05</td><td>Muscle</td><td>&#x0003C;.01</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>0.34<sup>a&#x02013;c</sup></td><td>0.26<sup>b&#x02013;d</sup></td><td>0.26<sup>b&#x02013;d</sup></td><td>0.15<sup>cd</sup></td><td>0.53<sup>a</sup></td><td/><td>Aging</td><td>&#x0003C;.01</td></tr><tr><td>&#x00394;<sup>2</sup></td><td>0.02</td><td>0.01</td><td>0.20</td><td>0.08</td><td>0.15</td><td/><td>Muscle &#x000D7; aging</td><td>.01</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="3">Desmin degradation 38</td><td>1</td><td>0.45<sup>de</sup></td><td>0.52<sup>c&#x02013;e</sup></td><td>0.01<sup>e</sup></td><td>0.02<sup>e</sup></td><td>0.76<sup>b&#x02013;d</sup></td><td>0.16</td><td>Muscle</td><td>&#x0003C;.01</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>1.04<sup>bc</sup></td><td>1.18<sup>ab</sup></td><td>0.05<sup>e</sup></td><td>0.08<sup>de</sup></td><td>1.75<sup>a</sup></td><td/><td>Aging</td><td>&#x0003C;.01</td></tr><tr><td>&#x00394;<sup>2</sup></td><td>0.59</td><td>0.66</td><td>0.04</td><td>0.06</td><td>0.99</td><td/><td>Muscle &#x000D7; aging</td><td>&#x0003C;.01</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="3">Troponin-T intact 37</td><td>1</td><td>1.07<sup>a</sup></td><td>0.97<sup>bc</sup></td><td>0.96<sup>bc</sup></td><td>0.93<sup>c</sup></td><td>1.00<sup>b</sup></td><td>0.02</td><td>Muscle</td><td>&#x0003C;.01</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>0.99<sup>b</sup></td><td>0.96<sup>bc</sup></td><td>0.95<sup>bc</sup></td><td>0.93<sup>c</sup></td><td>0.98<sup>bc</sup></td><td/><td>Aging</td><td>&#x0003C;.01</td></tr><tr><td>&#x00394;<sup>2</sup></td><td>0.08</td><td>0.01</td><td>0.01</td><td>0.00</td><td>0.02</td><td/><td>Muscle &#x000D7; aging</td><td>&#x0003C;.01</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="3">Troponin-T degradation 30</td><td>1</td><td>0.43<sup>bc</sup></td><td>0.10<sup>cd</sup></td><td>0.08<sup>d</sup></td><td>0.08<sup>d</sup></td><td>0.17<sup>cd</sup></td><td>0.07</td><td>Muscle</td><td>&#x0003C;.01</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>1.37<sup>a</sup></td><td>0.24<sup>b&#x02013;d</sup></td><td>0.09<sup>d</sup></td><td>0.10<sup>cd</sup></td><td>0.53<sup>b</sup></td><td/><td>Aging</td><td>&#x0003C;.01</td></tr><tr><td>&#x00394;<sup>2</sup></td><td>0.94</td><td>0.14</td><td>0.01</td><td>0.02</td><td>0.36</td><td/><td>Muscle &#x000D7; aging</td><td>&#x0003C;.01</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="3">Troponin-T degradation 28</td><td>1</td><td>0.48<sup>b</sup></td><td>0.08<sup>c</sup></td><td>0.05<sup>c</sup></td><td>0.06<sup>c</sup></td><td>0.17<sup>c</sup></td><td>0.06</td><td>Muscle</td><td>&#x0003C;.01</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>1.20<sup>a</sup></td><td>0.22<sup>bc</sup></td><td>0.06<sup>c</sup></td><td>0.08<sup>c</sup></td><td>0.46<sup>b</sup></td><td/><td>Aging</td><td>&#x0003C;.01</td></tr><tr><td>&#x00394;<sup>2</sup></td><td>0.72</td><td>0.14</td><td>0.01</td><td>0.02</td><td>0.29</td><td/><td>Muscle &#x000D7; aging</td><td>&#x0003C;.01</td></tr></tbody></table><table-wrap-foot><fn><p>GM, gluteus medius; LT, longissimus thoracis; PM, psoas major; SEM, standard error of mean; ST, semitendinosus; TB, triceps brachii.</p></fn><fn><label><sup>a&#x02013;e</sup></label><p>Least-squares means with different letters within each parameter (i.e.,&#x000A0;effect of muscle&#x02009;&#x000D7;&#x02009;aging) are significantly different (<italic>P</italic>&#x02009;&#x0003C;&#x02009;.05).</p></fn><fn><label><sup>1</sup></label><p>Values are expressed as relative ratio of band intensity compared to the corresponding bands of the reference samples.</p></fn><fn><label><sup>2</sup></label><p>&#x00394; was calculated as the difference in least-squares means for desmin, troponin-T, and their degradation products measured at 1-d postmortem and 10-d postmortem.</p></fn></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap><p>The LT muscle demonstrated the greatest abundance (<italic>P</italic>&#x02009;&#x0003C;&#x02009;.05) of intact troponin-T (37 kDa) at 1-d postmortem, and the greatest abundance (<italic>P</italic>&#x02009;&#x0003C;&#x02009;.05) of troponin-T degradation products (30 kDa and 28 kDa) at 10-d postmortem compared with other muscles. Additionally, an increase (<italic>P</italic>&#x02009;&#x0003C;&#x02009;.05) in the abundance of troponin-T degradation products (30 kDa and 28 kDa) were observed from 1-d to 10-d postmortem in the LT and GM muscles, whereas the PM, ST, and TB muscles exhibited minimal changes (<italic>P</italic>&#x02009;&#x0003E;&#x02009;.05) in intact troponin-T (37 kDa) and troponin-T degradation products (30 kDa and 28 kDa) during postmortem aging.</p><p>Overall, these results suggested that the LT and GM muscles exhibited the greatest level of postmortem proteolysis during aging, followed by the PM muscle, while the ST and TB muscles demonstrated the lowest level of proteolysis. This indicated that the LT and GM muscles, which demonstrated greater WBSF but also greater proteolytic potential, may benefit the most from extended periods of postmortem aging&#x02014;potentially up to 10 d to 14 d. In contrast, shorter aging periods may be sufficient for the ST, TB, and PM muscles.</p><p>In agreement with our findings, Wheeler et&#x000A0;al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r55">2000</xref>) documented pork LTL muscles had greater levels of desmin degradation compared with the ST and TB muscles. Christensen et&#x000A0;al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r14">2004</xref>) reported a faster rate of troponin-T and desmin degradation for pork LTL and <italic>semimembranosus</italic> muscles compared with ST, <italic>vastus intermedius</italic>, and <italic>soleus</italic> muscles, attributing these differences to the variations in muscle fiber type, calpain-1 activity, and the rate of pH decline among muscles. Melody et&#x000A0;al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r37">2004</xref>) reported a faster rate of pH decline, an increased rate of calpain-1 autolysis, and earlier degradation of desmin (within the first 24-h postmortem) for the PM compared with the LTL muscle. However, the earlier activation of calpain-1 in the PM might result in an earlier loss of calpain-1 activity, leading to reduced protein degradation and tenderization during extended periods of postmortem aging (up to 120-h postmortem) compared with the LT muscle. Together, these previous studies imply that the rate of pH decline within the first 6-h postmortem could influence the calpain-1 activity and ultimately influence drip loss and the rate of postmortem tenderization (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r37">Melody et&#x000A0;al., 2004</xref>).</p><p>Stepwise regression analysis was conducted to predict the calpain-1 autolysis for individual muscles using pH and temperature at different time points (data presented in supplementary tables). For the LT muscle, pH at 1-h postmortem accounted for the greatest variation (<italic>R</italic><sup>2</sup>&#x02009;=&#x02009;0.34) in autolyzed calpain-1 (76 kDa). For the PM and GM muscles, pH at 3-h postmortem explained the greatest variation (<italic>R</italic><sup>2</sup>&#x02009;=&#x02009;0.20 and <italic>R</italic><sup>2</sup>&#x02009;=&#x02009;0.23, respectively) in autolyzed calpain-1 (76 kDa). For the ST muscle, pH at 6-h postmortem explained the greatest variation (<italic>R</italic><sup>2</sup>&#x02009;=&#x02009;0.27) in autolyzed calpain-1 (76 kDa). For the TB muscle, pH at 9-h postmortem explained the greatest variation (<italic>R</italic><sup>2</sup>&#x02009;=&#x02009;0.35) in autolyzed calpain-1 (76 kDa). Additionally, for the LT and ST muscles, temperature at 24-h postmortem accounted for the greatest variation (<italic>R</italic><sup>2</sup>&#x02009;=&#x02009;0.31 and <italic>R</italic><sup>2</sup>&#x02009;=&#x02009;0.17) in autolyzed calpain-1 (76 kDa). The contributions of pH and temperature to calpain-1 autolysis during the early postmortem process (and the differences observed among muscles) may be partially attributed to the rate and extent of pH decline and the rate of temperature decline. Carlin et&#x000A0;al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r10">2006</xref>) reported that calpain-1 exhibited greater activity at pH 6.5 than pH 7.5. Pomponio et&#x000A0;al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r42">2010</xref>) suggested that a faster rate of pH decline in pork resulted in increased autolysis of calpain-1 and consequently an earlier loss of its activity. Therefore, while the rate of early pH decline could influence the activity of calpain-1, it may not necessarily impact the extent of proteolysis that occurs. Mohrhauser et&#x000A0;al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r39">2014</xref>) documented that calpain-1 activity and troponin-T degradation were not influenced by fast or slow pH decline treatments in beef. However, increased activation of calpain-1 and a reduction in troponin-T were observed at warmer temperatures. Ramos et&#x000A0;al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r43">2020</xref>) observed the delayed calpain-1 autolysis in Brahman <italic>longissimus lumborum</italic> (LL) muscle that exhibited resistance of pH decline and greater ATP content. The authors of that study suggested that calpain-1 autolysis was influenced by mitochondria related to energy production and calcium sequestration. These results indicated that the variation pH, temperature, and energy availability may collectively lead to muscle-specific proteolytic activity of calpain-1.</p></sec><sec id="sec3.6"><title>Trained sensory evaluation</title><p>An interaction (<italic>P</italic>&#x02009;&#x0003C;&#x02009;.01) between muscle and endpoint cooking temperature was observed for sensory tenderness and sensory juiciness (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f5">Figure&#x000A0;5B</xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f5">Figure&#x000A0;5C</xref>). Generally, decreasing endpoint cooking temperature improved sensory tenderness and sensory juiciness scores; however, the extent of reduction varied among the muscles. At an endpoint cooking temperature of 63&#x000B0;C, the PM muscle received greater (<italic>P</italic>&#x02009;&#x0003C;&#x02009;.05) sensory tenderness scores compared with the LT and TB muscles, with the ST and GM muscles at intermediate levels for sensory tenderness that did not differ from other muscles. At an endpoint cooking temperature of 71&#x000B0;C, the PM muscle was scored as the most tender (<italic>P</italic>&#x02009;&#x0003C;&#x02009;.05) among the muscles, while the other muscles demonstrated similar (<italic>P</italic>&#x02009;&#x0003E;&#x02009;.05) scores for sensory tenderness when compared with one another. Furthermore, the sensory tenderness of the PM muscle was not influenced (<italic>P</italic>&#x02009;&#x0003E;&#x02009;.05) by endpoint cooking temperature (either 63&#x000B0;C or 71&#x000B0;C), whereas improvements (<italic>P</italic>&#x02009;&#x0003C;&#x02009;.05) in sensory tenderness were observed for other muscles at endpoint cooking temperatures of 63&#x000B0;C compared with 71&#x000B0;C. Overall, these findings suggested that endpoint cooking temperature was less impactful for the PM muscle compared with other muscles in terms of sensory tenderness. When cooked to an endpoint temperature of 63&#x000B0;C, the ST muscle exhibited greater (<italic>P</italic>&#x02009;&#x0003C;&#x02009;.05) sensory juiciness compared with the LT and PM muscles, with the TB and GM muscles at intermediate levels for sensory juiciness. At an endpoint temperature of 71&#x000B0;C, the ST muscle received a greater (<italic>P</italic>&#x02009;&#x0003C;&#x02009;.05) sensory juiciness scores compared with the LT, GM, and PM muscles, while the TB muscle was an intermediate level for sensory juiciness. Although all muscles experienced an improvement (<italic>P</italic>&#x02009;&#x0003C;&#x02009;.05) in sensory juiciness as the endpoint cooking temperature was reduced from 71&#x000B0;C to 63&#x000B0;C, the LT muscle exhibited the greatest numerical increase in sensory juiciness (&#x00394;&#x02009;=&#x02009;4.70), whereas the ST muscle showed the smallest numerical increase in sensory juiciness (&#x00394;&#x02009;=&#x02009;2.99). Furthermore, all muscles exhibited a sensory juiciness score greater than 7.5 when cooked to an endpoint temperature of 63&#x000B0;C, and all muscles, except for the ST, demonstrated a sensory juiciness score lower than 7.5 when cooked to an endpoint temperature of 71&#x000B0;C.</p><p>Sensory chewiness and sensory pork flavor were not influenced (<italic>P</italic>&#x02009;&#x0003E;&#x02009;.05) by the interaction between muscle and endpoint cooking temperature; however, both were influenced (<italic>P</italic>&#x02009;&#x0003C;&#x02009;.01) by muscle and endpoint cooking temperature (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f5">Figure&#x000A0;5D</xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f5">Figure&#x000A0;5E</xref>). Reducing the endpoint cooking temperature from 71&#x000B0;C to 63&#x000B0;C lowered (<italic>P</italic>&#x02009;&#x0003C;&#x02009;.01) sensory chewiness levels and increased (<italic>P</italic>&#x02009;&#x0003C;&#x02009;.01) sensory pork flavor. The PM muscle was perceived as less chewy (<italic>P</italic>&#x02009;&#x0003C;&#x02009;.05) compared with most other muscles at both endpoint cooking temperatures. Exceptions for when the PM muscle was not different than other muscles were for the ST and GM muscles at the endpoint cooking temperature of 63&#x000B0;C and the ST muscle at the endpoint cooking temperature of 71&#x000B0;C (<italic>P</italic>&#x02009;&#x0003E;&#x02009;.05). For pork flavor, no difference (<italic>P</italic>&#x02009;&#x0003E;&#x02009;.05) between muscles was observed at the endpoint cooking temperature of 63&#x000B0;C, while the PM and ST muscles had greater levels (<italic>P</italic>&#x02009;&#x0003C;&#x02009;.05) of pork flavor compared with the LT and GM muscles at the endpoint cooking temperature of 71&#x000B0;C.</p><p>Consistent with our results, previous research documented that reducing endpoint cooking temperatures (i.e.,&#x000A0;degree of doneness) from 71&#x000B0;C to 63&#x000B0;C has been shown to improve sensory attributes by increasing sensory tenderness and sensory juiciness of pork LTL muscles (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r47">Rincker et&#x000A0;al., 2008</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r9">Bryan et&#x000A0;al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r19">Honegger et&#x000A0;al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r18">Honegger et&#x000A0;al., 2022</xref>). Moeller et&#x000A0;al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r38">2010</xref>) demonstrated that incremental increases in cooking temperature (62.8&#x000B0;C, 68.3&#x000B0;C, 73.9&#x000B0;C, and 79.4&#x000B0;C) reduced sensory juiciness and sensory tenderness scores when evaluated by a trained sensory panel. Klehm et&#x000A0;al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r29">2018</xref>) suggested that cooking pork LTL muscles to a lower endpoint cooking temperature (63&#x000B0;C vs. 71&#x000B0;C) was a more effective way to improve eating experience than the proposed US Department of Agriculture quality grades (based on subjective color and marbling) or packaging type. Moreover, Honegger et&#x000A0;al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r19">2019</xref>) reported that endpoint cooking temperature of the pork LTL muscle has a greater impact on consumer eating experience than visual color, marbling, or ultimate pH.</p><p>The influence of endpoint cooking temperature on sensory attributes of pork likely depends on muscle. In the current study, while sensory tenderness was improved at lower endpoint cooking temperature across most muscles, the observed magnitude of change for each muscle could be attributed to content and solubility of connective tissue. In support, Bejerholm and Aaslyng (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r4">2004</xref>) documented that sensory tenderness of pork LTL muscles decreased when endpoint cooking temperature was increased from 65&#x000B0;C to 80&#x000B0;C. However, sensory tenderness of the pork <italic>biceps femoris</italic> muscles decreased when the endpoint cooking temperature increased from 65&#x000B0;C to 75&#x000B0;C and then was improved when the endpoint cooking temperature increased from 75&#x000B0;C to 80&#x000B0;C. It was suggested that the differences between the 2 muscles could be attributed to their variation in connective tissue content and solubility (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r4">Bejerholm and Aaslyng, 2004</xref>). Similar to our results, Wheeler et&#x000A0;al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r55">2000</xref>) reported that the ST and TB muscles exhibited greater sensory tenderness, sensory juiciness, and sensory pork flavor compared with the LL muscle at an endpoint cooking temperature of 70&#x000B0;C. Furthermore, Channon et&#x000A0;al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r12">2016</xref>) observed that pork LTL muscles obtained lower sensory tenderness, sensory juiciness, and sensory flavor scores compared with shoulder muscles such as the TB, regardless of postmortem aging period, endpoint cooking temperatures, and cooking methods.</p></sec></sec><sec id="sec4"><title>Conclusion</title><p>The results of the current study suggest that substantial muscle-specific variations exist for the rate and extent of pH decline, the rate of temperature decline, color, tenderness, water-holding capacity, extent of proteolysis, and sensory traits. Consideration should be given to the individual muscles of interest when evaluating pork quality. In terms of postmortem proteolysis, muscle-specific aging strategies could be implemented, as results from this study suggested that LT and GM muscles could benefit from extended periods of postmortem aging (i.e.,&#x000A0;greater than 10 d), while shorter aging times (i.e.,&#x000A0;less than 10 d) appear to be sufficient for the ST, TB, and PM muscles. In terms of eating experience, interactions between muscle and endpoint cooking temperature for sensory tenderness and sensory juiciness suggest that some muscles may be more forgiving than others when cooked above the recommended endpoint cooking temperature of 63&#x000B0;C.</p><p>Future research should continue to focus on the underlying mechanisms that influence quality attributes in specific muscles, which could support the development of tailored quality specifications, optimized storage strategies, and cookery guidelines for each muscle cut. Furthermore, future research should continue to explore the primary drivers of eating experience and consumer perceptions of fresh pork in an effort to improve consumer use and acceptance for a variety of different pork offerings.</p></sec></body><back><sec id="sec5"><title>Conflict of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest.</p></sec><ack><title><bold>Acknowledgments</bold></title><p>This study was partially funded by the Internal Grant Program of the College of Food, Agricultural, and Environmental Sciences at The Ohio State University.</p></ack><sec id="sec6"><title>Author Contributions</title><p>Yifei Wang: conceptualization, methodology, investigation, formal analysis, data curation, writing&#x02014;original draft, and writing&#x02014;review and editing; Rebecca A. Brown: investigation; Milena Conte: investigation; Lyda G. Garcia: investigation and methodology; and Benjamin M. Bohrer: conceptualization, data curation, methodology, investigation, supervision, funding acquisition, project administration, and writing&#x02014;review and editing.</p></sec><ref-list><title>Literature Cited</title><ref id="r1"><mixed-citation publication-type="other"><collab>AOAC International</collab>. <year>2016</year>. <article-title>Official methods of analysis of AOAC International</article-title>. <edition>20th ed</edition>. APAC, Int., Rockville.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="r2"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Arkfeld</surname>, <given-names>E. K.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>K. B.</given-names> <surname>Wilson</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>M. F.</given-names> <surname>Overholt</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>B. N.</given-names> <surname>Harsh</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>J. E.</given-names> <surname>Lowell</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>E. K.</given-names> <surname>Hogan</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>B. J.</given-names> <surname>Klehm</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>B. M.</given-names> <surname>Bohrer</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>D. A.</given-names> <surname>Mohrhauser</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>D. A.</given-names> <surname>King</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>T. L.</given-names> <surname>Wheeler</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>A. C.</given-names> <surname>Dilger</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>S. D.</given-names> <surname>Shackelford</surname></string-name>, and <string-name><given-names>D. D.</given-names> <surname>Boler</surname></string-name></person-group>. <year>2016</year>. <article-title>Pork loin quality is not indicative of fresh belly or fresh and cured ham quality</article-title> <source>J. Anim. Sci</source>. <volume>94</volume>:<fpage>5155</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>5167</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2016-0886</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="r3"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Barkley</surname>, <given-names>K. E.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>D. D.</given-names> <surname>Boler</surname></string-name>, and <string-name><given-names>B. N.</given-names> <surname>Harsh</surname></string-name></person-group>. <year>2023</year>. <article-title>Color stability during retail display differs among muscles in pork</article-title>. <source>Meat and Muscle Biology</source>. <volume>7</volume>:<issue>15718</issue>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>13</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.22175/mmb.15718</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="r4"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Bejerholm</surname>, <given-names>C.</given-names></string-name>, and <string-name><given-names>M. D.</given-names> <surname>Aaslyng</surname></string-name></person-group>. <year>2004</year>. <article-title>The influence of cooking technique and core temperature on results of a sensory analysis of pork&#x02014;depending on the raw meat quality</article-title>. <source>Food Qual. Prefer</source>. <volume>15</volume>:<fpage>19</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>30</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0950-3293(03)00018-1</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="r5"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Bidner</surname>, <given-names>B. S.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>M.</given-names> <surname>Ellis</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>M. S.</given-names> <surname>Brewer</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>D.</given-names> <surname>Campion</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>E. R.</given-names> <surname>Wilson</surname></string-name>, and <string-name><given-names>F. K.</given-names> <surname>McKeith</surname></string-name></person-group>. <year>2004</year>. <article-title>Effect of ultimate pH on the quality characteristics of pork</article-title>. <source>J. Muscle Foods</source>. <volume>15</volume>:<fpage>139</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>154</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-4573.2004.tb00717.x</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="r6"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Bohrer</surname>, <given-names>B. M.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>Y.</given-names> <surname>Wang</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>J. B.</given-names> <surname>Dorleku</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>C. P.</given-names> <surname>Campbell</surname></string-name> and <string-name><given-names>I. B.</given-names> <surname>Mandell</surname></string-name></person-group>. <year>2024</year>. <article-title>Pork muscle profiling: pH and instrumental color of the <italic>longissimus thoracis</italic> is not representative of pH and instrumental color of shoulder and ham muscles</article-title>. <source>Meat Sci</source>. <volume>208</volume>:<fpage>109380</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2023.109380</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="r7"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Boler</surname>, <given-names>D. D.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>A. C.</given-names> <surname>Dilger</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>B. S.</given-names> <surname>Bidner</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>S. N.</given-names> <surname>Carr</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>J. M.</given-names> <surname>Eggert</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>J. W.</given-names> <surname>Day</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>M.</given-names> <surname>Ellis</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>F. K.</given-names> <surname>Mckeith</surname></string-name>, and <string-name><given-names>J.</given-names> <surname>Killefer</surname></string-name></person-group>. <year>2010</year>. <article-title>Ultimate pH explains variation in pork quality traits</article-title>. <source>J. Muscle Foods</source>. <volume>21</volume>:<fpage>119</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>130</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-4573.2009.00171.x</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="r8"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Brewer</surname>, <given-names>M. S.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>L. G.</given-names> <surname>Zhu</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>B.</given-names> <surname>Bidner</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>D. J.</given-names> <surname>Meisinger</surname></string-name>, and <string-name><given-names>F. K.</given-names> <surname>McKeith</surname></string-name></person-group>. <year>2001</year>. <article-title>Measuring pork color: effects of bloom time, muscle, pH and relationship to instrumental parameters</article-title>. <source>Meat Sci</source>. <volume>57</volume>:<fpage>169</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>176</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1740(00)00089-9</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="r9"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Bryan</surname>, <given-names>E. E.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>B. N.</given-names> <surname>Smith</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>R. N.</given-names> <surname>Dilger</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>A. C.</given-names> <surname>Dilger</surname></string-name>, and <string-name><given-names>D. D.</given-names> <surname>Boler</surname></string-name></person-group>. <year>2019</year>. <article-title>Technical note: a method for detection of differences in cook loss and tenderness of aged pork chops cooked to differing degrees of doneness using sous-vide</article-title>. <source>J. Anim. Sci</source>. <volume>97</volume>:<fpage>3348</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>3353</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skz198</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="r10"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Carlin</surname>, <given-names>K. R. M.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>E.</given-names> <surname>Huff-Lonergan</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>L. J.</given-names> <surname>Rowe</surname></string-name>, and <string-name><given-names>S. M.</given-names> <surname>Lonergan</surname></string-name></person-group>. <year>2006</year>. <article-title>Effect of oxidation, pH, and ionic strength on calpastatin inhibition of &#x003BC;- and m-calpain</article-title>. <source>J. Anim. Sci</source>. <volume>84</volume>: <fpage>925</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>937</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.2527/2006.844925x</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="r11"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Carlson</surname>, <given-names>K. B.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>K. J.</given-names> <surname>Prusa</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>C. A.</given-names> <surname>Fedler</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>E. M.</given-names> <surname>Steadham</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>E.</given-names> <surname>Huff-Lonergan</surname></string-name>, and <string-name><given-names>S. M.</given-names> <surname>Lonergan</surname></string-name></person-group>. <year>2017</year>. <article-title>Proteomic features linked to tenderness of aged pork loins</article-title>. <source>J. Anim. Sci</source>. <volume>95</volume>:<fpage>2533</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>2546</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2016.1122</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="r12"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Channon</surname>, <given-names>H. A.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>D. N.</given-names> <surname>D&#x02019;Souza</surname></string-name>, and <string-name><given-names>F. R.</given-names> <surname>Dunshea</surname></string-name></person-group>. <year>2016</year>. <article-title>Developing a cuts-based system to improve consumer acceptability of pork: impact of gender, ageing period, endpoint temperature and cooking method</article-title>. <source>Meat Sci</source>. <volume>121</volume>:<fpage>216</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>227</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2016.06.011</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="r13"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Choe</surname>, <given-names>J. H.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>Y. M.</given-names> <surname>Choi</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>S. H.</given-names> <surname>Lee</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>H. G.</given-names> <surname>Shin</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>Y. C.</given-names> <surname>Ryu</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>K. C.</given-names> <surname>Hong</surname></string-name>, and <string-name><given-names>B. C.</given-names> <surname>Kim</surname></string-name></person-group>. <year>2008</year>. <article-title>The relation between glycogen, lactate content and muscle fiber type composition, and their influence on postmortem glycolytic rate and pork quality</article-title>. <source>Meat Sci</source>. <volume>80</volume>:<fpage>355</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>362</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2007.12.019</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="r14"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Christensen</surname>, <given-names>M.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>P.</given-names> <surname>Henckel</surname></string-name>, and <string-name><given-names>P. P.</given-names> <surname>Purslow</surname></string-name></person-group>. <year>2004</year>. <article-title>Effect of muscle type on the rate of post-mortem proteolysis in pigs</article-title>. <source>Meat Sci</source>. <volume>66</volume>:<fpage>595</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>601</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1740(03)00175-X</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="r15"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Dorleku</surname>, <given-names>J. B.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>T.</given-names> <surname>Tayengwa</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>B. M.</given-names> <surname>Bohrer</surname></string-name>, and <string-name><given-names>M.</given-names> <surname>Ju&#x000E1;rez</surname></string-name></person-group>. <year>2025</year>. <article-title>Measuring pH of pork at specific temperatures postmortem to predict quality traits</article-title>. <source>Meat and Muscle Biology</source>. <volume>9</volume>:<issue>18532</issue>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>11</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.22175/mmb.18532</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="r16"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Feldhusen</surname>, <given-names>F.</given-names></string-name>, and <string-name><given-names>M.</given-names> <surname>K&#x000FC;hne</surname></string-name></person-group>. <year>1992</year>. <article-title>Effects of ultrarapid chilling and ageing on length of sarcomeres, and tenderness of pork</article-title>. <source>Meat Sci</source>. <volume>32</volume>:<fpage>161</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>171</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1016/0309-1740(92)90103-B</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="r17"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Gaffield</surname>, <given-names>K. N.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>E. D.</given-names> <surname>Schunke</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>J. E.</given-names> <surname>Lowell</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>A. C.</given-names> <surname>Dilger</surname></string-name>, and <string-name><given-names>B. N.</given-names> <surname>Harsh</surname></string-name></person-group>. <year>2020</year>. <article-title>Evaluation of the changes in composition of pork chops during cooking</article-title>. <source>Translational Animal Science</source>. <volume>4</volume>:<fpage>txaa154</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1093/tas/txaa154</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="r18"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Honegger</surname>, <given-names>L. T.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>E. E.</given-names> <surname>Bryan</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>H. E.</given-names> <surname>Price</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>T. K.</given-names> <surname>Ruth</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>D. D.</given-names> <surname>Boler</surname></string-name>, and <string-name><given-names>A. C.</given-names> <surname>Dilger</surname></string-name></person-group>. <year>2022</year>. <article-title>The effect of cooking method and cooked color on consumer acceptability of boneless pork chops</article-title>. <source>Foods</source>. <volume>11</volume>:<fpage>106</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11010106</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="r19"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Honegger</surname>, <given-names>L. T.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>E.</given-names> <surname>Richardson</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>E. D.</given-names> <surname>Schunke</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>A. C.</given-names> <surname>Dilger</surname></string-name>, and <string-name><given-names>D. D.</given-names> <surname>Boler</surname></string-name></person-group>. <year>2019</year>. <article-title>Final internal cooking temperature of pork chops influenced consumer eating experience more than visual color and marbling or ultimate pH</article-title>. <source>J. Anim. Sci</source>. <volume>97</volume>:<fpage>2460</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>2467</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skz117</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="r20"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Huff-Lonergan</surname>, <given-names>E.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>T. J.</given-names> <surname>Baas</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>M.</given-names> <surname>Malek</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>J. C. M.</given-names> <surname>Dekkers</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>K.</given-names> <surname>Prusa</surname></string-name>, and <string-name><given-names>M. F.</given-names> <surname>Rothschild</surname></string-name></person-group>. <year>2002</year>. <article-title>Correlations among selected pork quality traits</article-title>. <source>J. Anim. Sci</source>. <volume>80</volume>:<fpage>617</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>627</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.2527/2002.803617x</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="r21"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Huff-Lonergan</surname>, <given-names>E.</given-names></string-name>, and <string-name><given-names>S. M.</given-names> <surname>Lonergan</surname></string-name></person-group>. <year>2007</year>. <article-title>New frontiers in understanding drip loss in pork: recent insights on the role of postmortem muscle biochemistry</article-title>. <source>J. Anim. Breed. Genet</source>. <volume>124</volume>:<fpage>19</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>26</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0388.2007.00683.x</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="r22"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Jeong</surname>, <given-names>D. W.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>Y. M.</given-names> <surname>Choi</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>S. H.</given-names> <surname>Lee</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>J. H.</given-names> <surname>Choe</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>K. C.</given-names> <surname>Hong</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>H. C.</given-names> <surname>Park</surname></string-name>, and <string-name><given-names>B. C.</given-names> <surname>Kim</surname></string-name></person-group>. <year>2010</year>. <article-title>Correlations of trained panel sensory values of cooked pork with fatty acid composition, muscle fiber type, and pork quality characteristics in Berkshire pigs</article-title>. <source>Meat Sci</source>. <volume>86</volume>:<fpage>607</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>615</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2010.04.011</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="r23"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Johnson</surname>, <given-names>L. G.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>C.</given-names> <surname>Zhai</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>L. M.</given-names> <surname>Reever</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>K. J.</given-names> <surname>Prusa</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>M. N.</given-names> <surname>Nair</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>E.</given-names> <surname>Huff-Lonergan</surname></string-name>, and <string-name><given-names>S. M.</given-names> <surname>Lonergan</surname></string-name></person-group>. <year>2023</year>. <article-title>Characterizing the sarcoplasmic proteome of aged pork chops classified by purge loss</article-title>. <source>J. Anim. Sci</source>. <volume>101</volume>:<fpage>skad046</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skad046</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="r24"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Karlsson</surname>, <given-names>A. H.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>R. E.</given-names> <surname>Klont</surname></string-name>, and <string-name><given-names>X.</given-names> <surname>Fernandez</surname></string-name></person-group>. <year>1999</year>. <article-title>Skeletal muscle fibres as factors for pork quality</article-title>. <source>Livest. Prod. Sci</source>. <volume>60</volume>:<fpage>255</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>269</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-6226(99)00098-6</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="r25"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Kim</surname>, <given-names>G. D.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>J. Y.</given-names> <surname>Jeong</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>S. J.</given-names> <surname>Hur</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>H. S.</given-names> <surname>Yang</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>J. T.</given-names> <surname>Jeon</surname></string-name>, and <string-name><given-names>S. T.</given-names> <surname>Joo</surname></string-name></person-group>. <year>2010</year>. <article-title>The relationship between meat color (CIE <italic>L*</italic> and <italic>a*</italic>), myoglobin content, and their influence on muscle fiber characteristics and pork quality</article-title>. <source>Korean J. Food Sci. An</source>. <volume>30</volume>:<fpage>626</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>633</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.5851/kosfa.2010.30.4.626</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="r26"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Kim</surname>, <given-names>G. D.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>J. Y.</given-names> <surname>Jeong</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>E. Y.</given-names> <surname>Jung</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>H. S.</given-names> <surname>Yang</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>H. T.</given-names> <surname>Lim</surname></string-name>, and <string-name><given-names>S. T.</given-names> <surname>Joo</surname></string-name></person-group>. <year>2013</year>. <article-title>The influence of fiber size distribution of type IIB on carcass traits and meat quality in pigs</article-title>. <source>Meat Sci</source>. <volume>94</volume>:<fpage>267</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>273</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2013.02.001</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="r27"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Kim</surname>, <given-names>J. H.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>P. N.</given-names> <surname>Seong</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>S. H.</given-names> <surname>Cho</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>B. Y.</given-names> <surname>Park</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>K. H.</given-names> <surname>Hah</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>L. H.</given-names> <surname>Yu</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>D. G.</given-names> <surname>Lim</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>I. H.</given-names> <surname>Hwang</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>D. H.</given-names> <surname>Kim</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>J. M.</given-names> <surname>Lee</surname></string-name>, and <string-name><given-names>C. N.</given-names> <surname>Ahn</surname></string-name></person-group>. <year>2008</year>. <article-title>Characterization of nutritional value for twenty-one pork muscles. Asian Austral</article-title>. <source>J. Anim</source>. <volume>21</volume>:<fpage>138</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>143</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2008.70208</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="r28"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Kim</surname>, <given-names>Y. H. B.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>R. D.</given-names> <surname>Warner</surname></string-name>, and <string-name><given-names>K.</given-names> <surname>Rosenvold</surname></string-name></person-group>. <year>2014</year>. <article-title>Influence of high pre-rigor temperature and fast pH fall on muscle proteins and meat quality: a review</article-title>. <source>Anim. Prod. Sci</source>. <volume>54</volume>:<fpage>375</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>395</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1071/AN13329</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="r29"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Klehm</surname>, <given-names>B. J.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>D. A.</given-names> <surname>King</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>A. C.</given-names> <surname>Dilger</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>S. D.</given-names> <surname>Shackelford</surname></string-name>, and <string-name><given-names>D. D.</given-names> <surname>Boler</surname></string-name></person-group>. <year>2018</year>. <article-title>Effect of packaging type during postmortem aging and degree of doneness on pork chop sensory traits of loins selected to vary in color and marbling</article-title>. <source>J. Anim. Sci</source>. <volume>96</volume>:<fpage>1736</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>1744</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/sky084</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="r30"><mixed-citation publication-type="conf-proc"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Lee</surname>, <given-names>K. W.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>E. Y.</given-names> <surname>Jung</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>Y. H.</given-names> <surname>Hwang</surname></string-name>, and <string-name><given-names>S. T.</given-names> <surname>Joo</surname></string-name></person-group>. <year>2015</year>. Assessment of chemical components and pork quality traits of the 13 porcine muscles. In: <conf-name>Proceedings of the 61st International Congress of Meat Science and Technology</conf-name>, <publisher-name>Clermont-Ferrand</publisher-name>, <conf-loc>France</conf-loc> 23-28 August 2015.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="r31"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Lefaucheur</surname>, <given-names>L.</given-names></string-name></person-group> <year>2010</year>. <article-title>A second look into fibre typing&#x02014;relation to meat quality</article-title>. <source>Meat Sci</source>. <volume>84</volume>:<fpage>257</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>270</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2009.05.004</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="r32"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>LeMaster</surname>, <given-names>M. N.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>M.</given-names> <surname>Ha</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>F. R.</given-names> <surname>Dunshea</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>S.</given-names> <surname>Chauhan</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>D.</given-names> <surname>D&#x02019;Souza</surname></string-name>, and <string-name><given-names>R. D.</given-names> <surname>Warner</surname></string-name></person-group>. <year>2024</year>. <article-title>Impact of cooking temperature on pork <italic>longissimus</italic>, and muscle fibre type, on quality traits and protein denaturation of four pork muscles</article-title>. <source>Meat Sci</source>. <volume>209</volume>:<fpage>109395</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2023.109395</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="r33"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Lund</surname>, <given-names>M. N.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>R.</given-names> <surname>Lametsch</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>M. S.</given-names> <surname>Hviid</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>O. N.</given-names> <surname>Jensen</surname></string-name>, and <string-name><given-names>L. H.</given-names> <surname>Skibsted</surname></string-name></person-group>. <year>2007</year>. <article-title>High-oxygen packaging atmosphere influences protein oxidation and tenderness of porcine <italic>longissimus dorsi</italic> during chill storage</article-title>. <source>Meat Sci</source>. <volume>77</volume>:<fpage>295</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>303</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2007.03.016</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="r34"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Ma</surname>, <given-names>D.</given-names></string-name>, and <string-name><given-names>Y. H. B.</given-names> <surname>Kim</surname></string-name></person-group>. <year>2020</year>. <article-title>Proteolytic changes of myofibrillar and small heat shock proteins in different bovine muscles during aging: their relevance to tenderness and water-holding capacity</article-title>. <source>Meat Sci</source>. <volume>163</volume>:<fpage>108090</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2020.108090</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="r35"><mixed-citation publication-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Matarneh</surname>, <given-names>S. K.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>T. L.</given-names> <surname>Scheffler</surname></string-name>, and <string-name><given-names>D. E.</given-names> <surname>Gerrard</surname></string-name></person-group>. <year>2023</year>. Chapter 5&#x02014;the conversion of muscle to meat. In: <person-group person-group-type="editor"><string-name><given-names>F.</given-names> <surname>Toldr&#x000E1;</surname></string-name></person-group>, editor, Lawrie&#x02019;s meat science. <publisher-name>Elsevier, Ltd</publisher-name>. p.&#x000A0;<fpage>159</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>194</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-85408-5.00010-8</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="r36"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Matarneh</surname>, <given-names>S. K.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>S. L.</given-names> <surname>Silva</surname></string-name>, and <string-name><given-names>D. E.</given-names> <surname>Gerrard</surname></string-name></person-group>. <year>2021</year>. <article-title>New insights in muscle biology that alter meat quality</article-title>. <source>Annu. Rev. Anim. Biosci</source>. <volume>9</volume>:<fpage>355</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>377</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-animal-021419-083902</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="r37"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Melody</surname>, <given-names>J. L.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>S. M.</given-names> <surname>Lonergan</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>L. J.</given-names> <surname>Rowe</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>T. W.</given-names> <surname>Huiatt</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>M. S.</given-names> <surname>Mayes</surname></string-name>, and <string-name><given-names>E.</given-names> <surname>Huff-Lonergan</surname></string-name></person-group>. <year>2004</year>. <article-title>Early postmortem biochemical factors influence tenderness and water-holding capacity of three porcine muscles</article-title>. <source>J. Anim. Sci</source>. <volume>82</volume>:<fpage>1195</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>1205</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.2527/2004.8241195x</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="r38"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Moeller</surname>, <given-names>S. J.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>R. K.</given-names> <surname>Miller</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>T. L.</given-names> <surname>Aldredge</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>K. E.</given-names> <surname>Logan</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>K. K.</given-names> <surname>Edwards</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>H. N.</given-names> <surname>Zerby</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>M.</given-names> <surname>Boggess</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>J. M.</given-names> <surname>Box-Steffensmeier</surname></string-name>, and <string-name><given-names>C. A.</given-names> <surname>Stahl</surname></string-name></person-group>. <year>2010</year>. <article-title>Trained sensory perception of pork eating quality as affected by fresh and cooked pork quality attributes and end-point cooked temperature</article-title>. <source>Meat Sci</source>. <volume>85</volume>:<fpage>96</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>103</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2009.12.011</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="r39"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Mohrhauser</surname>, <given-names>D. A.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>S. M.</given-names> <surname>Lonergan</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>E.</given-names> <surname>Huff-Lonergan</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>K. R.</given-names> <surname>Underwood</surname></string-name>, and <string-name><given-names>A. D.</given-names> <surname>Weaver</surname></string-name></person-group>. <year>2014</year>. <article-title>Calpain-1 activity in bovine muscle is primarily influenced by temperature, not pH decline</article-title>. <source>J. Anim. Sci</source>. <volume>92</volume>:<fpage>1261</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>1270</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2013-7270</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="r40"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Muroya</surname>, <given-names>S.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>P.</given-names> <surname>Ertbjerg</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>L.</given-names> <surname>Pomponio</surname></string-name>, and <string-name><given-names>M.</given-names> <surname>Christensen</surname></string-name></person-group>. <year>2010</year>. <article-title>Desmin and troponin T are degraded faster in type IIb muscle fibers than in type I fibers during postmortem aging of porcine muscle</article-title>. <source>Meat Sci</source>. <volume>86</volume>:<fpage>764</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>769</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2010.06.019</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="r41"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Nishimura</surname>, <given-names>T.</given-names></string-name></person-group> <year>2010</year>. <article-title>The role of intramuscular connective tissue in meat texture</article-title>. <source>Anim. Sci. J</source>. <volume>81</volume>:<fpage>21</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>27</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-0929.2009.00696.x</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="r42"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Pomponio</surname>, <given-names>L.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>P.</given-names> <surname>Ertbjerg</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>A. H.</given-names> <surname>Karlsson</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>L. N.</given-names> <surname>Costa</surname></string-name>, and <string-name><given-names>R.</given-names> <surname>Lametsch</surname></string-name></person-group>, <year>2010</year>. <article-title>Influence of early pH decline on calpain activity in porcine muscle</article-title>. <source>Meat Sci</source>. <volume>85</volume>:<fpage>110</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>114</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2009.12.013</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="r43"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Ramos</surname>, <given-names>P. M.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>S. A.</given-names> <surname>Wright</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>E. F.</given-names> <surname>Delgado</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>E.</given-names> <surname>van Santen</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>D. D.</given-names> <surname>Johnson</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>J. M.</given-names> <surname>Scheffler</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>M. A.</given-names> <surname>Elzo</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>C. C.</given-names> <surname>Carr</surname></string-name>, and <string-name><given-names>T. L.</given-names> <surname>Scheffler</surname></string-name></person-group>. <year>2020</year>. <article-title>Resistance to pH decline and slower calpain-1 autolysis are associated with higher energy availability early <italic>postmortem</italic> in <italic>Bos taurus indicus</italic> cattle</article-title>. <source>Meat Sci</source>. <volume>159</volume>:<fpage>107925</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2019.107925</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="r44"><mixed-citation publication-type="conf-proc"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Rasmussen</surname>, <given-names>A. J.</given-names></string-name>, and <string-name><given-names>M.</given-names> <surname>Andersson</surname></string-name></person-group>. <year>1996</year>. New method for determination of drip loss in pork muscles. In: <conf-name>Proceedings of the 42nd International Congress of Meat Science and Technology</conf-name>, <conf-loc>Lillehammer, Norway</conf-loc> 1-6 September 1996. p.&#x000A0;<fpage>286</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>287</lpage>.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="r45"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Rhee</surname>, <given-names>M. S.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>T. L.</given-names> <surname>Wheeler</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>S. D.</given-names> <surname>Shackelford</surname></string-name>, and <string-name><given-names>M.</given-names> <surname>Koohmaraie</surname></string-name></person-group>. <year>2004</year>. <article-title>Variation in palatability and biochemical traits within and among eleven beef muscles</article-title>. <source>J. Anim. Sci</source>. <volume>82</volume>:<fpage>534</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>550</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.2527/2004.822534x</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="r46"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Richardson</surname>, <given-names>E. L.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>B.</given-names> <surname>Fields</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>A. C.</given-names> <surname>Dilger</surname></string-name>, and <string-name><given-names>D. D.</given-names> <surname>Boler</surname></string-name></person-group>. <year>2018</year>. <article-title>The effects of ultimate pH and color on sensory traits of pork loin chops cooked to a medium-rare degree of doneness</article-title>.<source>J. Anim. Sci</source>. <volume>96</volume>:<fpage>3768</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>3776</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/sky258</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="r47"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Rincker</surname>, <given-names>P. J.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>J.</given-names> <surname>Killefer</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>M.</given-names> <surname>Ellis</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>M. S.</given-names> <surname>Brewer</surname></string-name>, and <string-name><given-names>F. K.</given-names> <surname>McKeith</surname></string-name></person-group>. <year>2008</year>. <article-title>Intramuscular fat content has little influence on the eating quality of fresh pork loin chops</article-title>. <source>J. Anim. Sci</source>. <volume>86</volume>:<fpage>730</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>737</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2007-0490</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="r48"><mixed-citation publication-type="other"><collab>Statista</collab>. <year>2021</year>. Pork market in the U.S.&#x02014;statistics &#x00026; facts. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://statista.com/topics/7674/pork-market-in-the-us/">https://statista.com/topics/7674/pork-market-in-the-us/</ext-link> (Accessed on 25 June 2022).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="r50"><mixed-citation publication-type="web"><collab>The Pork Checkoff</collab>. <year>2009</year>. <article-title>US pork consumption and nutritional contribution of pork to the diet of the US</article-title>. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://porkcheckoff.org/research/us-pork-consumption-and-nutritional-contribution-of-pork-to-the-diet-of-the-us/">https://porkcheckoff.org/research/us-pork-consumption-and-nutritional-contribution-of-pork-to-the-diet-of-the-us/</ext-link> (Accessed on 8 May 2025).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="r51"><mixed-citation publication-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Valcu-Lisman</surname>, <given-names>A.</given-names></string-name></person-group> <year>2022</year>. <source>Per capita red meat and poultry consumption expected to decrease modestly in 2022</source>. <publisher-name>US Department of Agriculture Economic Research Service</publisher-name>. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://ers.usda.gov/data-products/charts-of-note/chart-detail?chartId=103767">https://ers.usda.gov/data-products/charts-of-note/chart-detail?chartId=103767</ext-link> (Accessed on 10 June 2025).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="r52"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Vaskoska</surname>, <given-names>R.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>M.</given-names> <surname>Ha</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>Z. B.</given-names> <surname>Naqvi</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>J. D.</given-names> <surname>White</surname></string-name>, and <string-name><given-names>R. D.</given-names> <surname>Warner</surname></string-name></person-group>. <year>2020</year>. <article-title>Muscle, ageing and temperature influence the changes in texture, cooking loss and shrinkage of cooked beef</article-title>. <source>Foods</source>. <volume>9</volume>:<fpage>1289</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.3390/foods9091289</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="r53"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Warner</surname>, <given-names>R. D.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>R. G.</given-names> <surname>Kauffman</surname></string-name>, and <string-name><given-names>R. L.</given-names> <surname>Russel</surname></string-name></person-group>. <year>1993</year>. <article-title>Quality attributes of major porcine muscles: a comparison with the <italic>Longissimus Lumborum</italic></article-title>. <source>Meat Sci</source>. <volume>33</volume>:<fpage>59</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>372</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1016/0309-1740(93)90007-5</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="r54"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Warner</surname>, <given-names>R.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>R.</given-names> <surname>Miller</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>M.</given-names> <surname>Ha</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>T. L.</given-names> <surname>Wheeler</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>F.</given-names> <surname>Dunshea</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>X.</given-names> <surname>Li</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>R.</given-names> <surname>Vaskoska</surname></string-name>, and <string-name><given-names>P.</given-names> <surname>Purslow</surname></string-name></person-group>. <year>2021</year>. <article-title>Meat tenderness: underlying mechanisms, instrumental measurement, and sensory assessment</article-title>. <source>Meat and Muscle Biology</source>. <volume>4</volume>:<issue>17</issue>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>25</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.22175/mmb.10489</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="r55"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Wheeler</surname>, <given-names>T. L.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>S. D.</given-names> <surname>Shackelford</surname></string-name>, and <string-name><given-names>M.</given-names> <surname>Koohmaraie</surname></string-name></person-group>. <year>2000</year>. <article-title>Variation in proteolysis, sarcomere length, collagen content, and tenderness among major pork muscles</article-title>. <source>J. Anim. Sci</source>. <volume>78</volume>:<fpage>958</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>965</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.2527/2000.784958x</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="r56"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Wilson</surname>, <given-names>K. B.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>M. F.</given-names> <surname>Overholt</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>C. M.</given-names> <surname>Shull</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>C.</given-names> <surname>Schwab</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>A. C.</given-names> <surname>Dilger</surname></string-name>, and <string-name><given-names>D. D.</given-names> <surname>Boler</surname></string-name></person-group>. <year>2017</year>. <article-title>The effects of instrumental color and extractable lipid content on sensory characteristics of pork loin chops cooked to a medium-rare degree of doneness</article-title>. <source>J. Anim. Sci</source>. <volume>95</volume>:<fpage>2052</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>2060</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2016.1313</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="r57"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Zhang</surname>, <given-names>J.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>D.</given-names> <surname>Ma</surname></string-name>, and <string-name><given-names>Y. H. B.</given-names> <surname>Kim</surname></string-name></person-group>. <year>2020</year>. <article-title>Mitochondrial apoptosis and proteolytic changes of myofibrillar proteins in two different pork muscles during aging</article-title>. <source>Food Chem</source>. <volume>319</volume>:<fpage>126571</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2020.126571</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="r58"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Zhang</surname>, <given-names>S. H.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>L.</given-names> <surname>Zhu</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>Z. H.</given-names> <surname>Wu</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>Y.</given-names> <surname>Zhang</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>G. Q.</given-names> <surname>Tang</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>Y. Z.</given-names> <surname>Jiang</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>M. Z.</given-names> <surname>Li</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>L.</given-names> <surname>Bai</surname></string-name>, and <string-name><given-names>X. W.</given-names> <surname>Li</surname></string-name></person-group>. <year>2013</year>. <article-title>Effect of muscle-fiber type on glycogenin-1 gene expression and its relationship with the glycolytic potential and pH of pork</article-title>. <source>Genet. Mol. Res</source>. <volume>12</volume>:<fpage>3383</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>3390</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24065679/</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="r59"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>&#x0017B;ochowska</surname>, <given-names>J.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>K.</given-names> <surname>Lachowicz</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>L.</given-names> <surname>Gajowiecki</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>M.</given-names> <surname>Sobczak</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>M.</given-names> <surname>Kotowicz</surname></string-name>, and <string-name><given-names>A.</given-names> <surname>&#x0017B;ych</surname></string-name></person-group>. <year>2005</year>. <article-title>Effects of carcass weight and muscle on texture, structure and myofibre characteristics of wild boar meat</article-title>. <source>Meat Sci</source>. <volume>71</volume>:<fpage>244</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>248</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2005.03.019</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref></ref-list><app-group><app id="app1"><table-wrap id="tab5"><label>Supplementary Table 1.</label><caption><p>Summary of stepwise regression predicting instrumental color (<italic>L*</italic>, <italic>a*</italic>, and <italic>b*</italic>) and drip loss using postmortem pH at different time point for five pork muscles.<sup>1,2,3</sup></p></caption><table frame="hsides" rules="groups"><colgroup><col align="left"/><col align="center"/><col align="center"/><col align="center"/><col align="center"/><col align="center"/><col align="center"/><col align="center"/><col align="center"/><col align="center"/></colgroup><thead><tr><th/><th/><th/><th colspan="7" align="center">Partial R<sup>2</sup></th></tr><tr><th/><th/><th>Full R<sup>2</sup></th><th>pH 1&#x000A0;h</th><th>pH 3&#x000A0;h</th><th>pH 6&#x000A0;h</th><th>pH 9&#x000A0;h</th><th>pH 12&#x000A0;h</th><th>pH 24&#x000A0;h</th><th>Slaughter event</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td rowspan="4">LT</td><td><italic>L*</italic></td><td>0.81</td><td>0.61</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>0.20</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td><italic>a*</italic></td><td>0.17</td><td>0.17</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td><italic>b*</italic></td><td>0.52</td><td>0.52</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>Drip loss</td><td>0.51</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>0.30</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>0.21</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="4">PM</td><td><italic>L*</italic></td><td>0.33</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>0.33</td></tr><tr><td><italic>a*</italic></td><td>0.50</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>0.17</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>0.33</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td><italic>b*</italic></td><td>0.43</td><td>-</td><td>0.43</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>Drip loss</td><td>N/A</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="4">ST</td><td><italic>L*</italic></td><td>N/A</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td><italic>a*</italic></td><td>0.59</td><td>0.13</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>0.24</td><td>-</td><td>0.22</td></tr><tr><td><italic>b*</italic></td><td>0.59</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>0.35</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>0.24</td></tr><tr><td>Drip loss</td><td>0.67</td><td>0.50</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>0.16</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="4">TB</td><td><italic>L*</italic></td><td>0.23</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>0.23</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td><italic>a*</italic></td><td>0.16</td><td>0.16</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td><italic>b*</italic></td><td>0.50</td><td>0.20</td><td>0.15</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>0.14</td></tr><tr><td>Drip loss</td><td>0.22</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>0.22</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="4">GM</td><td><italic>L*</italic></td><td>0.21</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>0.21</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td><italic>a*</italic></td><td>0.24</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>0.24</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td><italic>b*</italic></td><td>0.54</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>0.21</td><td>0.16</td><td>0.18</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>Drip loss</td><td>N/A</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr></tbody></table><table-wrap-foot><fn><label><sup>1</sup></label><p>Muscles: LT, <italic>longissimus thoracis</italic>; PM, <italic>psoas major</italic>; ST, <italic>semitendinosus</italic>; TB, <italic>triceps brachii</italic>; GM, <italic>gluteus medius</italic>.</p></fn><fn><label><sup>2</sup></label><p>N/A indicates no variable met the 0.15 significance level for entry into the model.</p></fn><fn><label><sup>3</sup></label><p>The option SLENTRY&#x02009;=&#x02009;0.15 SLSTAY&#x02009;=&#x02009;0.15 was used to generate the regression model.</p></fn></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap><table-wrap id="tab6"><label>Supplementary Table 2.</label><caption><p>Summary of stepwise regression predicting instrumental color (<italic>L*</italic>, <italic>a*</italic>, and <italic>b*</italic>) and drip loss using postmortem temperature (Temp) at different time point for five pork muscles.<sup>1,2,3</sup></p></caption><table frame="hsides" rules="groups"><colgroup><col align="left" width="9*"/><col align="center" width="10*"/><col align="center" width="10*"/><col align="center" width="10*"/><col align="center" width="10*"/><col align="center" width="9*"/><col align="center" width="10*"/><col align="center" width="10*"/><col align="center" width="10*"/><col align="center" width="10*"/></colgroup><thead><tr><th/><th/><th/><th colspan="7" align="center">Partial R<sup>2</sup></th></tr><tr><th/><th/><th>Full R<sup>2</sup></th><th>Temp 1&#x000A0;h</th><th>Temp 3&#x000A0;h</th><th>Temp 6&#x000A0;h</th><th>Temp 9&#x000A0;h</th><th>Temp 12&#x000A0;h</th><th>Temp 24&#x000A0;h</th><th>Slaughter event</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td rowspan="4">LT</td><td><italic>L*</italic></td><td>0.82</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>0.43</td><td>-</td><td>0.17</td><td>-</td><td>0.07</td></tr><tr><td><italic>a*</italic></td><td>N/A</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td><italic>b*</italic></td><td>N/A</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>Drip loss</td><td>0.32</td><td>0.32</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="4">PM</td><td><italic>L*</italic></td><td>0.68</td><td>0.13</td><td>0.13</td><td>-</td><td>0.09</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>0.37</td></tr><tr><td><italic>a*</italic></td><td>0.20</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>0.20</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td><italic>b*</italic></td><td>0.48</td><td>0.19</td><td>0.16</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>0.12</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>Drip loss</td><td>N/A</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="4">ST</td><td><italic>L*</italic></td><td>N/A</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td><italic>a*</italic></td><td>0.63</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>0.18</td><td>0.23</td><td>-</td><td>0.21</td></tr><tr><td><italic>b*</italic></td><td>0.27</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>0.27</td></tr><tr><td>Drip loss</td><td>N/A</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="4" style="border-bottom">TB</td><td><italic>L*</italic></td><td>N/A</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td><italic>a*</italic></td><td>0.29</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>0.29</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td><italic>b*</italic></td><td>0.32</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>0.14</td><td>0.18</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td style="border-bottom">Drip loss</td><td style="border-bottom">0.51</td><td style="border-bottom">-</td><td style="border-bottom">0.24</td><td style="border-bottom">0.28</td><td style="border-bottom">-</td><td style="border-bottom">-</td><td style="border-bottom">-</td><td style="border-bottom">-</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="4">GM</td><td><italic>L*</italic></td><td>N/A</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td><italic>a*</italic></td><td>N/A</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td><italic>b*</italic></td><td>N/A</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>Drip loss</td><td>0.38</td><td>-</td><td>0.18</td><td>-</td><td>0.21</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr></tbody></table><table-wrap-foot><fn><label><sup>1</sup></label><p>Muscles: LT, <italic>longissimus thoracis</italic>; PM, <italic>psoas major</italic>; ST, <italic>semitendinosus</italic>; TB, <italic>triceps brachii</italic>; GM, <italic>gluteus medius</italic>.</p></fn><fn><label><sup>2</sup></label><p>N/A indicates no variable met the 0.15 significance level for entry into the model.</p></fn><fn><label><sup>3</sup></label><p>The option SLENTRY=0.15 SLSTAY=0.15 was used to generate the regression model.</p></fn></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap><table-wrap id="tab7"><label>Supplementary Table 3.</label><caption><p>Summary of stepwise regression predicting calpain-1 autolysis of five pork muscles at 24&#x000A0;h postmortem from pH at different time point.<sup>1,2,3,4</sup></p></caption><table frame="hsides" rules="groups"><colgroup><col align="left" width="9*"/><col align="center" width="10*"/><col align="center" width="10*"/><col align="center" width="10*"/><col align="center" width="10*"/><col align="center" width="9*"/><col align="center" width="10*"/><col align="center" width="10*"/><col align="center" width="10*"/><col align="center" width="10*"/></colgroup><thead><tr><th/><th/><th/><th colspan="7" align="center">Partial R<sup>2</sup></th></tr><tr><th/><th/><th>Full R<sup>2</sup></th><th>pH 1&#x000A0;h</th><th>pH 3&#x000A0;h</th><th>pH 6&#x000A0;h</th><th>pH 9&#x000A0;h</th><th>pH 12&#x000A0;h</th><th>pH 24&#x000A0;h</th><th>Slaughter event</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td rowspan="3">LT</td><td>80 kDa</td><td>0.46</td><td>0.46</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>78 kDa</td><td>NA</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>76 kDa</td><td>0.34</td><td>0.34</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="3">PM</td><td>80 kDa</td><td>0.43</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>0.43</td></tr><tr><td>78 kDa</td><td>NA</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>76 kDa</td><td>0.83</td><td>-</td><td>0.20</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>0.09</td><td>-</td><td>0.54</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="3">ST</td><td>80 kDa</td><td>0.82</td><td>0.14</td><td>-</td><td>0.30</td><td>0.09</td><td>-</td><td>0.12</td><td>0.16</td></tr><tr><td>78 kDa</td><td>0.62</td><td>0.20</td><td>0.42</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>76 kDa</td><td>0.49</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>0.27</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>0.21</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="3">TB</td><td>80 kDa</td><td>0.66</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>0.48</td><td>0.09</td><td>0.09</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>78 kDa</td><td>NA</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>76 kDa</td><td>0.35</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>0.35</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="3">GM</td><td>80 kDa</td><td>0.34</td><td>-</td><td>0.34</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>78 kDa</td><td>0.18</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>0.18</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>76 kDa</td><td>0.23</td><td>-</td><td>0.23</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr></tbody></table><table-wrap-foot><fn><label><sup>1</sup></label><p>Muscles: LT, <italic>longissimus thoracis</italic>; PM, <italic>psoas major</italic>; ST, <italic>semitendinosus</italic>; TB, <italic>triceps brachii</italic>; GM, <italic>gluteus medius</italic>.</p></fn><fn><label><sup>2</sup></label><p>N/A indicates no variable met the 0.15 significance level for entry into the model.</p></fn><fn><label><sup>3</sup></label><p>The option SLENTRY=0.15 SLSTAY=0.15 was used to generate the regression model.</p></fn><fn><label><sup>4</sup></label><p>Values are expressed as a percentage of the catalytic subunit present as the unautolyzed (80 kDa) form or the autolysis products (78 and 76 kDa) of the catalytic subunit of calpain-1.</p></fn></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap><table-wrap id="tab8"><label>Supplementary Table 4.</label><caption><p>Summary of stepwise regression predicting calpain-1 autolysis of pork muscles from temperature (Temp) at different time point.<sup>1,2,3,4</sup></p></caption><table frame="hsides" rules="groups"><colgroup><col align="left"/><col align="center"/><col align="center"/><col align="center"/><col align="center"/><col align="center"/><col align="center"/><col align="center"/><col align="center"/><col align="center"/></colgroup><thead><tr><th/><th/><th/><th colspan="7" align="center">Partial R<sup>2</sup></th></tr><tr><th/><th/><th>Full R<sup>2</sup></th><th>Temp 1&#x000A0;h</th><th>Temp 3&#x000A0;h</th><th>Temp 6&#x000A0;h</th><th>Temp 9&#x000A0;h</th><th>Temp 12&#x000A0;h</th><th>Temp 24&#x000A0;h</th><th>Slaughter event</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td rowspan="3">LT</td><td>80 kDa</td><td>NA</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>78 kDa</td><td>0.60</td><td>-</td><td>0.14</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>0.33</td><td>0.12</td></tr><tr><td>76 kDa</td><td>0.31</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>0.31</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="3">PM</td><td>80 kDa</td><td>0.58</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>0.11</td><td>-</td><td>0.47</td></tr><tr><td>78 kDa</td><td>0.26</td><td>0.26</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>76 kDa</td><td>0.57</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>0.57</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="3">ST</td><td>80 kDa</td><td>0.28</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>0.28</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>78 kDa</td><td>0.39</td><td>-</td><td>0.12</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>0.27</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>76 kDa</td><td>0.17</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>0.17</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="3">TB</td><td>80 kDa</td><td>NA</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>78 kDa</td><td>NA</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>76 kDa</td><td>NA</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="3">GM</td><td>80 kDa</td><td>0.51</td><td>-</td><td>0.36</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>0.15</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>78 kDa</td><td>NA</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>76 kDa</td><td>0.50</td><td>-</td><td>0.22</td><td>-</td><td>0.28</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr></tbody></table><table-wrap-foot><fn><label><sup>1</sup></label><p>Muscles: LT, <italic>longissimus thoracis</italic>; PM, <italic>psoas major</italic>; ST, <italic>semitendinosus</italic>; TB, <italic>triceps brachii</italic>; GM, <italic>gluteus medius</italic>.</p></fn><fn><label><sup>2</sup></label><p>N/A indicates no variable met the 0.15 significance level for entry into the model.</p></fn><fn><label><sup>3</sup></label><p>The option SLENTRY=0.15 SLSTAY=0.15 was used to generate the regression model.</p></fn><fn><label><sup>4</sup></label><p>Values are expressed as a percentage of the catalytic subunit present as the unautolyzed (80 kDa) form or the autolysis products (78 and 76 kDa) of the catalytic subunit of calpain-1.</p></fn></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap></app></app-group></back></article>