<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD with OASIS Tables with MathML3 v1.2d1 20130915//EN" "JATS-archive-oasis-article1.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" xml:lang="en" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">MMB</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Meat and Muscle Biology</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2575-985X</issn><publisher><publisher-name>American Meat Science Association</publisher-name><publisher-loc/></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.22175/mmb.13217</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id"/><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Original Research Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Extending the Shelf Life of Beef Steaks Using Acerola Cherry Powder and Rosemary Extract</article-title><alt-title alt-title-type="right-running">Van Buren et al.&#x02003;&#x02003;&#x02003;&#x02003;&#x02003;Topical application of natural antioxidants</alt-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Van Buren</surname><given-names>Jessie B.</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Buseman</surname><given-names>Brianna J.</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Weber</surname><given-names>Tanya M.</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Nasados</surname><given-names>James A.</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Lancaster</surname><given-names>Jessica M.</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Smart</surname><given-names>Jaxon H.</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Church</surname><given-names>James A.</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Price</surname><given-names>William J.</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Bass</surname><given-names>Phillip D.</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name><surname>Colle</surname><given-names>Michael J.</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1">,*</xref></contrib><aff id="aff1"><label><sup>1</sup></label>Department of Animal, Veterinary, and Food Sciences, <institution>University of Idaho</institution>, Moscow, ID 83844, USA</aff><aff id="aff2"><label><sup>2</sup></label>University of Idaho Extension, <institution>University of Idaho</institution>, Grangeville, ID 83530, USA</aff><aff id="aff3"><label><sup>3</sup></label>Statistical Programs, College of Agricultural and Life Sciences, <institution>University of Idaho</institution>, Moscow, ID 83844, USA</aff></contrib-group><author-notes><corresp id="cor1"><label>&#x0002A;</label>Corresponding author. Email: <email>mjcolle@uidaho.edu</email> (Michael J. Colle)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date date-type="epub" publication-format="electronic"><day>00</day><month>00</month><year>0000</year></pub-date><volume>6</volume><issue>1</issue><fpage>1</fpage><lpage>10</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>28</day><month>10</month><year>2021</year></date><date date-type="accepted"><day>21</day><month>12</month><year>2021</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-year>2021</copyright-year><copyright-holder>&#x000A9; American Meat Science Association.</copyright-holder><license license-type="open-access" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/"><license-p>This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY license (<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link>)</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><title>Abstract</title><p>Improvements in retail shelf life of exported beef will help with merchandising and increase competitiveness in the worldwide market for United States beef products. The objective of this study was to determine the effect of topically applying acerola cherry powder or rosemary extract from various suppliers on beef bone-in short rib steak and chuck roll steak shelf life. USDA Choice beef bone-in short ribs (IMPS 123A) and chuck rolls (IMPS 116A) were aged (0&#x000B0;C) for 28 d postfabrication. Following aging, 1.02-cm-thick steaks were cut (<italic>N</italic>&#x02009;&#x0003D;&#x02009;126) and systematically assigned to a treatment based on steak location within the subprimal. Treatments included untreated control (C), topically sprayed (2&#x000A0;mL) with an acerola cherry powder solution (0.05%) from 1 of 3 suppliers (C1, C2, C3), or topically sprayed (2&#x000A0;mL) with a rosemary extract solution (0.10%) from 1 of 3 suppliers (R1, R2, R3). Half of the steaks were assigned to day 0 lipid oxidation, metmyoglobin-reducing activity (MRA), and oxygen consumption; the remaining steaks were assigned to color evaluation over 4 d of retail display followed by day 4 lipid oxidation and MRA. Short rib steaks treated with antioxidants had a brighter oxygenated lean color than control steaks (<italic>P</italic>&#x02009;&#x0003C;&#x02009;0.001). There was an interaction (<italic>P</italic>&#x02009;&#x0003D;&#x02009;0.028) between time of retail display and MRA. Short rib steaks treated with C3 and R2 did not change in MRA between day 0 and 4 (<italic>P</italic>&#x02009;&#x0003D;&#x02009;0.620, <italic>P</italic>&#x02009;&#x0003D;&#x02009;0.428, respectively). Chuck roll steaks treated with C1, C2, C3, R2, and R3 all had a higher, or more desirable, MRA than the control steaks on day 0 (<italic>P</italic>&#x02009;&#x0003C;&#x02009;0.001). Applying topical antioxidants improves the shelf-life stability of steaks from beef bone-in short ribs and chuck rolls aged for an extended period.</p></abstract><kwd-group><title>Key words:</title><kwd>antioxidants</kwd><kwd>extended aging</kwd><kwd>shelf life</kwd><kwd>beef</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="sec1"><title>Introduction</title><p>According to the United States Meat Export Federation (USMEF), in 2019, 14.1% of US beef was exported, contributing over $7.4 billion of revenue, averaging $308.74 per head. The Republic of Korea (South Korea) was identified to be the US beef industry&#x02019;s largest growing export market due to growing household incomes and insufficient beef production (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r26">USDA FAS, 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r27">USMEF, 2020</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r28">2021</xref>).</p><p>Currently, it takes a minimum of 28 d to ship chilled beef from the US to South Korea (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r27">USMEF, 2020</xref>). <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r4">Colle et&#x000A0;al. (2015</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r5">2016</xref>) determined extended aging can cause product quality issues, such as increased lipid oxidation, darkened lean color (<italic>L&#x0002A;</italic>), and reduced redness (<italic>a&#x0002A;</italic>) throughout retail display. Extended aging also has been shown to decrease metmyoglobin-reducing activity (MRA) and pH (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r8">English et&#x000A0;al., 2016</xref>) as well as mitochondrial oxygen consumption (OC) rate (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r19">Mancini and Ramanathan, 2014</xref>). Additionally, Gill (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r10">1996</xref>) suggested that when bone-in beef cuts stored or aged for a longer period of time are cut for retail display, the bone blackens faster than unaged bones. Further, the lean tissue of a short rib steak and much of the chuck roll steak contains the <italic>Serratus ventralis</italic> (SV) muscle, which has been classified as having low color stability (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r21">McKenna et&#x000A0;al., 2005</xref>).</p><p>A potential solution to improve US beef shelf life is the application of antioxidants to the surface of the steaks. Antioxidants are commonly incorporated into ground products to improve color and delay lipid oxidation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r23">Oswell et&#x000A0;al., 2018</xref>). Ascorbic acid and rosemary extract have the potential to improve color stability of beef muscles (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r7">Djenane et&#x000A0;al., 2003</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r6">Colle et&#x000A0;al., 2019</xref>). Acerola cherry powder is a natural form of ascorbic acid. Determining a method to improve the color stability of US beef in international markets requiring lengthy shipping could provide the opportunity for increased international demand for US beef exports and producer profits. The objective of this study was to determine the effect of the topical application of acerola cherry powder and rosemary extract from various suppliers on beef bone-in short rib steak and chuck roll steak shelf life including color and lipid oxidation.</p></sec><sec id="sec2"><title>Materials and Methods</title><sec id="sec2.1"><title>Product preparation</title><p>Eighteen beef bone-in short ribs (IMPS 123A) and 8 beef chuck rolls (IMPS 116A) from USDA Choice carcasses were purchased from a commercial harvest facility and transported to the University of Idaho Meat Laboratory under refrigeration (3.5&#x000A0;h; 4&#x000B0;C) on day 1 and day 2 postfabrication for the chuck rolls and short ribs, respectively. The subprimals were wet-aged at 0&#x000B0;C for 28 d postfabrication to simulate transpacific shipping time prior to being prepared for retail display. Following aging, short ribs, perpendicular to the bone, and chuck rolls were cut into 1.02-cm-thick steaks (<italic>N</italic>&#x02009;&#x0003D;&#x02009;126) to mimic South Korean retail steak fabrication style. To avoid potential effects due to steak location within subprimal, steaks were assigned on a rotating basis to a treatment group (<italic>n</italic>&#x02009;&#x0003D;&#x02009;16 steaks per treatment). Antioxidant treatments were topically sprayed (2&#x000A0;mL) with a commercially available spray bottle (CleanCheck Commercial Sprayer, Tolco, Toledo, OH). Volume sprayed was evaluated to consistently spray 1 g or 1&#x000A0;mL water prior to antioxidant application. Treatments based on previous research (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r7">Djenane et&#x000A0;al., 2003</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r6">Colle et&#x000A0;al., 2019</xref>) and manufacture recommendations included an untreated control (C), a 0.05% acerola cherry powder solution from 1 of 3 commercially available suppliers [C1 (Fortium A, Kemin Industries, Des Moines, IA), C2 (Micro Ingredients Acerola Cherries Organic Vitamin C Powder, Montclair, CA), or C3 (Acerola Cherry Powder, Pure, American Fork, UT)], or a 0.10% rosemary extract solution from 1 of 3 commercially available suppliers [R1 (Fortium R10 Dry, Kemin Industries), R2 (Herbalox Rosemary Extract, Kalsec, Kalamazoo, MI), or R3 (GUARDIAN Rosemary Extract 08, Danisco, Madison, WI)]. Half of the steaks were assigned by steak location within subprimal to day 0 lipid oxidation, MRA, and OC rate; the remaining steaks were assigned to 4 d of retail display followed by day 4 lipid oxidation and MRA. Steaks were displayed in a retail display room (366&#x000A0;cm in length&#x02009;&#x000D7;&#x02009;274&#x000A0;cm in width&#x02009;&#x000D7;&#x02009;274&#x000A0;cm in height) at 2&#x000B0;C. The display room was equipped with natural white 4,000&#x000A0;W lights, and the average light intensity at the steak surface was 849 lux (Fisherbrand Traceable Dual-Range Light Meter, Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA). To avoid potential effects due to display location, steaks were rotated in the retail environment daily.</p></sec><sec id="sec2.2"><title>Retail fluid loss</title><p>Following topical application on day 0, retail display steaks were weighed, placed in white foam trays (CKF Inc. #88142, Langley, BC, Canada), and overwrapped with an oxygen-permeable polyvinyl chloride film (oxygen transmission rate: 1,450&#x000A0;cc/645&#x000A0;cm<sup>2</sup> per 24&#x000A0;h; water vapor transmission rate: 17.0 g/645&#x000A0;cm<sup>2</sup> per 24&#x000A0;h; Koch Industries, Inc., #7500-3815, Wichita, KS). Following 4 d of retail display, steaks were removed from the retail packaging and reweighed to determine retail moisture loss. Percent retail fluid loss was calculated using the following equation: <disp-formula><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>%</mml:mo><mml:mtext>&#x02009;</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>&#x02009;</mml:mtext><mml:mi>Fluid</mml:mi><mml:mtext>&#x02009;</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>&#x02009;</mml:mtext><mml:mi>Loss</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mtext>&#x02009;</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>&#x02009;</mml:mtext><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mi>Initial</mml:mi><mml:mtext>&#x02009;</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>&#x02009;</mml:mtext><mml:mi>Weight</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#x02212;</mml:mo><mml:mi>Final</mml:mi><mml:mtext>&#x02009;</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>&#x02009;</mml:mtext><mml:mi>Weight</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>Initial</mml:mi><mml:mtext>&#x02009;</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>&#x02009;</mml:mtext><mml:mi>Weight</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:mo>&#x000D7;</mml:mo><mml:mn>100</mml:mn><mml:mo form="postfix">%</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p></sec><sec id="sec2.3"><title>Retail color</title><p>Retail display steaks were allowed to bloom for 60&#x000A0;min, and then 2 objective color measurements per steak were obtained on the SV using a Nix Pro 2 Color Sensor (Nix Sensor Ltd., Hamilton, ON, Canada). Two objective color measurements were also taken on the bone marrow of the short rib steaks. The Nix Pro 2 Sensor was equipped with a 14-mm-diameter measuring area and a 2&#x000B0; standard observer. The instrument was set to Illuminant D<sub>65</sub> and Commission Internationale de l&#x000B4;Eclairage <italic>L&#x0002A;</italic> (lightness), <italic>a&#x0002A;</italic> (redness), and <italic>b&#x0002A;</italic> (yellowness) values were recorded. After the initial reading on day 0 of retail display, color was measured a second time 6&#x000A0;h later. Subsequent color measurements were taken twice daily (06:00 and 18:00) on day 1, 2, and 3 and once (06:00) on day 4. Oxygenated lean color (1&#x02009;&#x0003D;&#x02009;extremely bright cherry red, 8&#x02009;&#x0003D;&#x02009;extremely dark red), discoloration (1&#x02009;&#x0003D;&#x02009;none, 5&#x02009;&#x0003D;&#x02009;extreme), surface discoloration (1&#x02009;&#x0003D;&#x02009;no discoloration 0%, 6&#x02009;&#x0003D;&#x02009;extensive discoloration 81% to 100%), bone marrow color (1&#x02009;&#x0003D;&#x02009;bright reddish pink to red, 7&#x02009;&#x0003D;&#x02009;black), color uniformity (1&#x02009;&#x0003D;&#x02009;uniform no two-toning, 5&#x02009;&#x0003D;&#x02009;extreme two-toning), and amount of browning (1&#x02009;&#x0003D;&#x02009;no evidence of browning, 6&#x02009;&#x0003D;&#x02009;dark brown) were evaluated at the time points previously described by a trained panel (4 evaluators for short rib steaks, 6 evaluators for chuck roll steaks) following American Meat Science Association guidelines (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r2">AMSA, 2012</xref>). Panelists were screened to check for color blindness and to fall within the age range of 14 to 59 years. Following screening, a training utilized pictures, color tiles, and in-person steak examples to standardize panelists.</p></sec><sec id="sec2.4"><title>Metmyoglobin-reducing activity</title><p>Nitric oxide MRA was measured after treatment on day 0 and on day 4 of retail display on the SV following protocols outlined in Section XI of the Meat Color Measurement Guidelines (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r2">AMSA, 2012</xref>). Two color measurements from each sample were obtained using a HunterLab MiniScan EZ (Reston, VA) equipped with a 25-mm-diameter measuring area and a 10&#x000B0; standard observer. The instrument was set to Illuminant A and reflectance from 400 to 700 nm was recorded. Calibration occurred by measuring against black and white calibration tiles prior to measuring color. The percentage of metmyoglobin (MMb) was calculated following equations in Section XI of the Meat Color Measurements Guidelines (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r2">AMSA, 2012</xref>). MRA was calculated as follows: <disp-formula><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>MRA</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mi>Initial</mml:mi><mml:mtext>&#x02009;</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>&#x02009;</mml:mtext><mml:mo>%</mml:mo><mml:mtext>&#x02009;</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>&#x02009;</mml:mtext><mml:mi>MMb</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#x02212;</mml:mo><mml:mi>Final</mml:mi><mml:mtext>&#x02009;</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>&#x02009;</mml:mtext><mml:mo>%</mml:mo><mml:mtext>&#x02009;</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>&#x02009;</mml:mtext><mml:mi>MMb</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>Initial</mml:mi><mml:mtext>&#x02009;</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>&#x02009;</mml:mtext><mml:mo>%</mml:mo><mml:mtext>&#x02009;</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>&#x02009;</mml:mtext><mml:mi>MMb</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>&#x000D7;</mml:mo><mml:mn>100</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p></sec><sec id="sec2.5"><title>Oxygen consumption</title><p>OC was measured on the SV after treatment on day 0 following protocols outlined in the Meat Color Measurement Guidelines (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r2">AMSA, 2012</xref>). Color measurements were taken similar to the MRA protocol. The percentage of oxymyoglobin (OMb) was calculated following equations in Section XI of the Meat Color Measurement Guidelines (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r2">AMSA, 2012</xref>). OC was calculated as follows: <disp-formula><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>OC</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mi>Initial</mml:mi><mml:mtext>&#x02009;</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>&#x02009;</mml:mtext><mml:mo>%</mml:mo><mml:mtext>&#x02009;</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>&#x02009;</mml:mtext><mml:mi>OMb</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#x02212;</mml:mo><mml:mi>Final</mml:mi><mml:mtext>&#x02009;</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>&#x02009;</mml:mtext><mml:mo>%</mml:mo><mml:mtext>&#x02009;</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>&#x02009;</mml:mtext><mml:mi>OMb</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>Initial</mml:mi><mml:mtext>&#x02009;</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>&#x02009;</mml:mtext><mml:mo>%</mml:mo><mml:mtext>&#x02009;</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>&#x02009;</mml:mtext><mml:mi>OMb</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>&#x000D7;</mml:mo><mml:mn>100</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p></sec><sec id="sec2.6"><title>Lipid oxidation</title><p>Thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS) were analyzed in duplicate on day 0 after treatment and on day 4 of retail display following the protocol in Section XI, Appendix O of the Meat Color Measurement Guidelines (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r2">AMSA, 2012</xref>). Samples were excised from the SV avoiding the steak edge and large pieces of fat and connective tissue and weighed 1 g.</p></sec><sec id="sec2.7"><title>Statistical analysis</title><p>In this factorial design, there were 6 antioxidant treatments and 1 control treatment. Analyses collected at more than time point are a split-plot design with repeated measures. On the short ribs, data were collected on 18 subprimals and 63 steaks per antioxidant treatment-retail display time combination. On the chuck rolls, data were collected on 8 subprimals and 63 steaks per antioxidant treatment-retail display time combination. Data were analyzed using mixed model analysis of variance. Antioxidant treatments, retail display time, and their interaction were assumed as fixed effects. Retail display time was considered a repeated measure modeled as a compound symmetric correlation structure. MRA and lipid oxidation were evaluated at 2 retail display time points, whereas color was analyzed at 9 retail display time points. Each steak subjective color score was averaged across evaluators prior to analysis. Subjective and objective color data were analyzed with subprimal and steak location within subprimal as random effects. Treatment least square means differences were assessed through pair-wise comparisons for significant effects. Significance was determined at <italic>P</italic>&#x02009;&#x0003C;&#x02009;0.05. All statistical analyses were conducted using SAS V 9.4 (SAS Inc., Cary, NC).</p></sec></sec><sec id="sec3"><title>RESULTS AND DISCUSSION</title><sec id="sec3.1"><title>Retail fluid loss</title><p>In the short rib steaks, there was a significant difference in retail fluid loss between the treatments (<italic>P</italic>&#x02009;&#x0003D;&#x02009;0.024; Table&#x000A0;<xref ref-type="table" rid="tab1">1</xref>). The control and R1 treated steaks lost the most fluid loss over retail display. The remaining antioxidant treatments (C1, C2, C3, R2, and R3) all had decreased fluid loss (<italic>P</italic>&#x02009;&#x0003C;&#x02009;0.05) compared to the control steaks. Loss of fluid during retail display results in a drier cooked product for the consumer (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r17">Lawrie and Ledward, 2006</xref>). One hypothesis for the reduced retail fluid loss in antioxidant-treated steaks is that the antioxidants formed hydrogen bonds with water and meat proteins, thus reducing purge compared to the control. Research connecting retail fluid loss to antioxidant treatment is scarce. Therefore, more research is needed to determine the relationship between topical antioxidant treatments and retail fluid loss. Future research utilizing a positive control treatment of 2&#x000A0;mL water topically applied to steaks could assist in determining the relationship.</p><table-wrap id="tab1"><label>Table 1.</label><caption><p>Estimated mean effects of topical antioxidant treatment on bone-in short rib steak fluid loss, color, oxygen consumption, and lipid oxidation (<italic>n</italic>&#x02009;&#x0003D;&#x02009;63)</p></caption><table><colgroup><col align="left"/><col align="char" char="."/><col align="char" char="."/><col align="char" char="."/><col align="char" char="."/><col align="char" char="."/><col align="char" char="."/><col align="char" char="."/><col align="char" char="."/><col align="char" char="."/></colgroup><thead><tr><th/><th colspan="7" align="center">Topical antioxidant treatment<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab1-fn2"><sup>1</sup></xref></th><th/><th/></tr><tr><th>Trait</th><th>Control</th><th>C1</th><th>C2</th><th>C3</th><th>R1</th><th>R2</th><th>R3</th><th>SEM</th><th><italic>P</italic> value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Retail fluid loss, %</td><td>3.35<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab1-fn1"><sup>a</sup></xref></td><td>0.62<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab1-fn1"><sup>b</sup></xref></td><td>0.40<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab1-fn1"><sup>b</sup></xref></td><td>0.15<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab1-fn1"><sup>b</sup></xref></td><td>1.54<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab1-fn1"><sup>ab</sup></xref></td><td>0.52<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab1-fn1"><sup>b</sup></xref></td><td>0.61<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab1-fn1"><sup>b</sup></xref></td><td>0.80</td><td>0.024</td></tr><tr><td>Bone marrow <italic>L&#x0002A;</italic></td><td>45.39<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab1-fn1"><sup>abc</sup></xref></td><td>46.28<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab1-fn1"><sup>a</sup></xref></td><td>45.21<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab1-fn1"><sup>bcd</sup></xref></td><td>44.75<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab1-fn1"><sup>cd</sup></xref></td><td>46.13<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab1-fn1"><sup>ab</sup></xref></td><td>46.08<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab1-fn1"><sup>ab</sup></xref></td><td>44.11<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab1-fn1"><sup>d</sup></xref></td><td>0.92</td><td>0.001</td></tr><tr><td>Bone marrow <italic>a&#x0002A;</italic></td><td>14.54<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab1-fn1"><sup>b</sup></xref></td><td>14.20<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab1-fn1"><sup>b</sup></xref></td><td>14.76<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab1-fn1"><sup>b</sup></xref></td><td>14.07<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab1-fn1"><sup>b</sup></xref></td><td>14.16<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab1-fn1"><sup>b</sup></xref></td><td>14.30<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab1-fn1"><sup>b</sup></xref></td><td>15.52<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab1-fn1"><sup>a</sup></xref></td><td>0.37</td><td>0.001</td></tr><tr><td>Bone marrow <italic>b&#x0002A;</italic></td><td>10.00<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab1-fn1"><sup>c</sup></xref></td><td>10.57<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab1-fn1"><sup>bc</sup></xref></td><td>10.56<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab1-fn1"><sup>bc</sup></xref></td><td>10.57<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab1-fn1"><sup>bc</sup></xref></td><td>10.69<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab1-fn1"><sup>b</sup></xref></td><td>10.75<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab1-fn1"><sup>b</sup></xref></td><td>11.35<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab1-fn1"><sup>a</sup></xref></td><td>0.25</td><td>0.004</td></tr><tr><td>Lean <italic>L&#x0002A;</italic></td><td>41.11</td><td>41.22</td><td>41.06</td><td>42.08</td><td>41.22</td><td>40.68</td><td>40.90</td><td>0.68</td><td>0.445</td></tr><tr><td>Lean <italic>a&#x0002A;</italic></td><td>20.49</td><td>21.47</td><td>21.36</td><td>21.11</td><td>20.49</td><td>20.83</td><td>21.10</td><td>0.38</td><td>0.412</td></tr><tr><td>Lean <italic>b&#x0002A;</italic></td><td>13.17</td><td>13.90</td><td>13.88</td><td>13.41</td><td>13.60</td><td>13.68</td><td>13.80</td><td>0.41</td><td>0.855</td></tr><tr><td>Oxygenated lean color<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab1-fn3"><sup>2</sup></xref></td><td>4.5<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab1-fn1"><sup>a</sup></xref></td><td>4.2<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab1-fn1"><sup>c</sup></xref></td><td>4.3<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab1-fn1"><sup>b</sup></xref></td><td>4.3<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab1-fn1"><sup>b</sup></xref></td><td>4.3<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab1-fn1"><sup>b</sup></xref></td><td>4.2<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab1-fn1"><sup>bc</sup></xref></td><td>4.2<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab1-fn1"><sup>bc</sup></xref></td><td>0.2</td><td>0.001</td></tr><tr><td>Amount of browning<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab1-fn4"><sup>3</sup></xref></td><td>1.1</td><td>1.1</td><td>1.1</td><td>1.1</td><td>1.1</td><td>1.1</td><td>1.1</td><td>0.1</td><td>0.202</td></tr><tr><td>Discoloration<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab1-fn5"><sup>4</sup></xref></td><td>1.1</td><td>1.1</td><td>1.1</td><td>1.1</td><td>1.1</td><td>1.1</td><td>1.1</td><td>0.1</td><td>0.262</td></tr><tr><td>Surface discoloration<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab1-fn6"><sup>5</sup></xref></td><td>1.1</td><td>1.1</td><td>1.1</td><td>1.1</td><td>1.1</td><td>1.1</td><td>1.1</td><td>0.1</td><td>0.491</td></tr><tr><td>Color uniformity<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab1-fn7"><sup>6</sup></xref></td><td>1.3</td><td>1.3</td><td>1.3</td><td>1.3</td><td>1.4</td><td>1.4</td><td>1.3</td><td>0.1</td><td>0.307</td></tr><tr><td>Bone marrow color<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab1-fn8"><sup>7</sup></xref></td><td>3.4</td><td>3.3</td><td>3.4</td><td>3.5</td><td>3.4</td><td>3.3</td><td>3.3</td><td>0.1</td><td>0.235</td></tr><tr><td>Oxygen consumption, %</td><td>48.78</td><td>55.64</td><td>52.16</td><td>43.49</td><td>58.04</td><td>55.74</td><td>60.68</td><td>6.00</td><td>0.224</td></tr><tr><td>Lipid oxidation<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab1-fn9"><sup>8</sup></xref></td><td>0.50</td><td>0.53</td><td>0.51</td><td>0.47</td><td>0.42</td><td>0.48</td><td>0.35</td><td>0.07</td><td>0.323</td></tr></tbody></table><table-wrap-foot><fn id="tab1-fn1"><label><sup>a&#x02013;c</sup></label><p>Within a row, means without a common superscript differ (<italic>P</italic>&#x02009;&#x0003C;&#x02009;0.05).</p></fn><fn id="tab1-fn2"><label><sup>1</sup></label><p>Treatments included an untreated control (C), topically sprayed (2&#x000A0;mL) with a 0.05% acerola cherry powder solution from 1 of 3 suppliers (C1, C2, or C3), or topically sprayed (2&#x000A0;mL) with a 0.10% rosemary extract solution from 1 of 3 suppliers (R1, R2, or R3).</p></fn><fn id="tab1-fn3"><label><sup>2</sup></label><p>Oxygenated lean color scale: 1&#x02009;&#x0003D;&#x02009;extremely bright cherry red, 8&#x02009;&#x0003D;&#x02009;extremely dark red.</p></fn><fn id="tab1-fn4"><label><sup>3</sup></label><p>Amount of browning scale: 1&#x02009;&#x0003D;&#x02009;no evidence of browning, 6&#x02009;&#x0003D;&#x02009;dark brown.</p></fn><fn id="tab1-fn5"><label><sup>4</sup></label><p>Discoloration scale: 1&#x02009;&#x0003D;&#x02009;none, 5&#x02009;&#x0003D;&#x02009;extreme.</p></fn><fn id="tab1-fn6"><label><sup>5</sup></label><p>Surface discoloration scale: 1&#x02009;&#x0003D;&#x02009;no discoloration (0%), 6&#x02009;&#x0003D;&#x02009;extensive discoloration (81% to 100%).</p></fn><fn id="tab1-fn7"><label><sup>6</sup></label><p>Color uniformity scale: 1&#x02009;&#x0003D;&#x02009;uniform no two-toning, 5&#x02009;&#x0003D;&#x02009;extreme two-toning.</p></fn><fn id="tab1-fn8"><label><sup>7</sup></label><p>Bone marrow color scale: 1&#x02009;&#x0003D;&#x02009;bright reddish pink to red, 7&#x02009;&#x0003D;&#x02009;black.</p></fn><fn id="tab1-fn9"><label><sup>8</sup></label><p>Milligrams malondialdehyde/kilograms meat.</p></fn><fn id="tab1-fn10"><p>SEM&#x02009;&#x0003D;&#x02009;standard error of the mean.</p></fn></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap><p>In the chuck roll steaks, antioxidants did not impact fluid loss in the steaks throughout retail display (Table&#x000A0;<xref ref-type="table" rid="tab2">2</xref>; <italic>P</italic>&#x02009;&#x0003D;&#x02009;0.372), similar to Colle et&#x000A0;al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r6">2019</xref>). The overall average retail display fluid loss was 2.21%, which is slightly higher than steaks from <italic>Longissimus lumborum</italic>, <italic>Gluteus medius</italic>, <italic>Biceps femoris</italic>, and <italic>Semimembranosus</italic> aged for an extended period of time observed in previous studies (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r4">Colle et&#x000A0;al., 2015</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r5">2016</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r6">2019</xref>). Additionally, this was higher than the average (1.03%) for the bone-in short ribs in the current study. Chuck roll steaks are composed of several muscles which may lead to greater fluid loss and increased variation. Lastly, cutting the steaks thinner (1.02&#x000A0;cm) than traditional fabrication (2.54&#x000A0;cm) may have increased fluid loss, as greater surface area has been associated with increased fluid loss (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r1">Aberle et&#x000A0;al., 2012</xref>).</p><table-wrap id="tab2"><label>Table 2.</label><caption><p>Estimated mean effects of topical antioxidant treatment on chuck roll steak fluid loss, color, oxygen consumption, and lipid oxidation (<italic>n</italic>&#x02009;&#x0003D;&#x02009;63)</p></caption><table><colgroup><col align="left"/><col align="char" char="."/><col align="char" char="."/><col align="char" char="."/><col align="char" char="."/><col align="char" char="."/><col align="char" char="."/><col align="char" char="."/><col align="char" char="."/><col align="char" char="."/></colgroup><thead><tr><th/><th colspan="7" align="center">Topical antioxidant treatment<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab2-fn2"><sup>1</sup></xref></th><th/><th/></tr><tr><th>Trait</th><th>Control</th><th>C1</th><th>C2</th><th>C3</th><th>R1</th><th>R2</th><th>R3</th><th>SEM</th><th><italic>P</italic> value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Retail fluid loss, %</td><td>1.00</td><td>1.55</td><td>4.72</td><td>1.23</td><td>1.52</td><td>3.99</td><td>1.28</td><td>1.50</td><td>0.372</td></tr><tr><td><italic>L&#x0002A;</italic></td><td>39.20<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab2-fn1"><sup>ab</sup></xref></td><td>38.87<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab2-fn1"><sup>bc</sup></xref></td><td>38.90<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab2-fn1"><sup>bc</sup></xref></td><td>38.41<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab2-fn1"><sup>c</sup></xref></td><td>39.95<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab2-fn1"><sup>a</sup></xref></td><td>39.79<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab2-fn1"><sup>a</sup></xref></td><td>38.86<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab2-fn1"><sup>bc</sup></xref></td><td>0.98</td><td>0.001</td></tr><tr><td><italic>b&#x0002A;</italic></td><td>13.57</td><td>14.05</td><td>13.77</td><td>14.11</td><td>14.23</td><td>14.25</td><td>13.89</td><td>0.30</td><td>0.186</td></tr><tr><td>Oxygenated lean color<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab2-fn3"><sup>2</sup></xref></td><td>5.3</td><td>5.3</td><td>5.3</td><td>5.4</td><td>5.1</td><td>5.2</td><td>5.3</td><td>0.2</td><td>0.373</td></tr><tr><td>Amount of browning<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab2-fn4"><sup>3</sup></xref></td><td>2.7</td><td>2.7</td><td>2.7</td><td>2.8</td><td>2.7</td><td>2.6</td><td>2.6</td><td>0.1</td><td>0.801</td></tr><tr><td>Discoloration<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab2-fn5"><sup>4</sup></xref></td><td>2.6</td><td>2.5</td><td>2.6</td><td>2.6</td><td>2.5</td><td>2.6</td><td>2.5</td><td>0.1</td><td>0.924</td></tr><tr><td>Surface discoloration<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab2-fn6"><sup>5</sup></xref></td><td>2.8</td><td>2.7</td><td>2.7</td><td>2.9</td><td>2.7</td><td>2.8</td><td>2.7</td><td>0.1</td><td>0.584</td></tr><tr><td>Color uniformity<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab2-fn7"><sup>6</sup></xref></td><td>2.7</td><td>2.7</td><td>2.6</td><td>2.7</td><td>2.7</td><td>2.6</td><td>2.7</td><td>0.1</td><td>0.552</td></tr><tr><td>Oxygen consumption, %</td><td>63.30</td><td>67.93</td><td>58.33</td><td>66.17</td><td>65.12</td><td>66.79</td><td>61.62</td><td>4.00</td><td>0.053</td></tr><tr><td>Lipid oxidation<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab2-fn8"><sup>7</sup></xref></td><td>0.71</td><td>0.65</td><td>0.61</td><td>0.69</td><td>0.68</td><td>0.70</td><td>0.54</td><td>0.08</td><td>0.276</td></tr></tbody></table><table-wrap-foot><fn id="tab2-fn1"><label><sup>a&#x02013;c</sup></label><p>Within a row, means without a common superscript differ (<italic>P</italic>&#x02009;&#x0003C;&#x02009;0.05).</p></fn><fn id="tab2-fn2"><label><sup>1</sup></label><p>Treatments included an untreated control (C), topically sprayed (2&#x000A0;mL) with a 0.05% acerola cherry powder solution from 1 of 3 suppliers (C1, C2, or C3), or topically sprayed (2&#x000A0;mL) with a 0.10% rosemary extract solution from 1 of 3 suppliers (R1, R2, or R3).</p></fn><fn id="tab2-fn3"><label><sup>2</sup></label><p>Oxygenated lean color scale: 1&#x02009;&#x0003D;&#x02009;extremely bright cherry red, 8&#x02009;&#x0003D;&#x02009;extremely dark red.</p></fn><fn id="tab2-fn4"><label><sup>3</sup></label><p>Amount of browning scale: 1&#x02009;&#x0003D;&#x02009;no evidence of browning, 6&#x02009;&#x0003D;&#x02009;dark brown.</p></fn><fn id="tab2-fn5"><label><sup>4</sup></label><p>Discoloration scale: 1&#x02009;&#x0003D;&#x02009;none, 5&#x02009;&#x0003D;&#x02009;extreme.</p></fn><fn id="tab2-fn6"><label><sup>5</sup></label><p>Surface discoloration scale: 1&#x02009;&#x0003D;&#x02009;no discoloration (0%), 6&#x02009;&#x0003D;&#x02009;extensive discoloration (81% to 100%).</p></fn><fn id="tab2-fn7"><label><sup>6</sup></label><p>Color uniformity scale: 1&#x02009;&#x0003D;&#x02009;uniform no two-toning, 5&#x02009;&#x0003D;&#x02009;extreme two-toning.</p></fn><fn id="tab2-fn8"><label><sup>7</sup></label><p>Milligrams malondialdehyde/kilograms meat.</p></fn><fn id="tab2-fn9"><p>SEM&#x02009;&#x0003D;&#x02009;standard error of the mean.</p></fn></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap></sec><sec id="sec3.2"><title>Retail objective color</title><p>An interaction between retail display time and treatment was not observed in short rib steak bone marrow <italic>L&#x0002A;</italic>, <italic>a&#x0002A;</italic>, or <italic>b&#x0002A;</italic> (<italic>P</italic>&#x02009;&#x0003D;&#x02009;0.936, <italic>P</italic>&#x02009;&#x0003D;&#x02009;0.246, and <italic>P</italic>&#x02009;&#x0003D;&#x02009;0.277, respectively). However, antioxidant treatments differed in <italic>L&#x0002A;</italic>, <italic>a&#x0002A;</italic>, and <italic>b&#x0002A;</italic> (<italic>P</italic>&#x02009;&#x0003C;&#x02009;0.001, <italic>P</italic>&#x02009;&#x0003D;&#x02009;0.001, <italic>P</italic>&#x02009;&#x0003D;&#x02009;0.004, respectively; Table&#x000A0;<xref ref-type="table" rid="tab1">1</xref>) for short rib steak bone marrow. Interestingly, steaks treated with R3 had darker and redder bone marrow (<italic>P</italic>&#x02009;&#x0003C;&#x02009;0.05) than the control steaks. Additionally, all rosemary extract&#x02013;treated steaks (R1, R2, and R3) had more yellow bone marrow (<italic>P</italic>&#x02009;&#x0003C;0.05) than the control steaks. Ascorbic acid, the active ingredient of acerola cherry powder, has the ability to donate electrons to prevent the myoglobin oxidation process (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r6">Buettner and Jerkiewicz, 1996</xref>), which is similar to hemoglobin oxidation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r16">Lanari et&#x000A0;al., 1995</xref>). Based on previous research of ascorbic acid on vertebrae (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r20">Mancini et&#x000A0;al., 2004</xref>), it was anticipated that acerola cherry powder would improve redness more than rosemary extract&#x02013;treated bone marrow and untreated bone marrow (C). However, differences in bone marrow redness between treatments did not occur possibly due to the lower concentrations of acerola cherry powder used compared to research by Mancini et&#x000A0;al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r20">2004</xref>), who used higher concentrations of ascorbic acid. Lower concentrations of ascorbic acid act as a meat pro-oxidant by reducing iron from the ferric to ferrous state, a powerful pro-oxidant (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r6">Buettner and Jerkiewicz, 1996</xref>). Utilizing higher acerola cherry powder concentrations in future research could improve redness. Throughout retail display, bone marrow differed in <italic>L&#x0002A;</italic>, <italic>a&#x0002A;</italic>, and <italic>b&#x0002A;</italic> (<italic>P</italic>&#x02009;&#x0003D;0.020, <italic>P</italic>&#x02009;&#x0003C;&#x02009;0.001, <italic>P</italic>&#x02009;&#x0003C;&#x02009;0.001, respectively; Table&#x000A0;<xref ref-type="table" rid="tab3">3</xref>). Lightness of the bone marrow fluctuated throughout retail display, whereas redness and yellowness decreased over time. The decline in bone marrow color after being exposed to oxygen was anticipated due to the oxidation of iron within the hemoglobin (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r10">Gill, 1996</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r16">Lanari et&#x000A0;al., 1995</xref>).</p><table-wrap id="tab3"><label>Table 3.</label><caption><p>Estimated mean effects of retail display time on bone-in short rib steak color (<italic>n</italic>&#x02009;&#x0003D;&#x02009;63)</p></caption><table><colgroup><col align="left"/><col align="char" char="."/><col align="char" char="."/><col align="char" char="."/><col align="char" char="."/><col align="char" char="."/><col align="char" char="."/><col align="char" char="."/><col align="char" char="."/><col align="char" char="."/><col align="char" char="."/><col align="char" char="."/></colgroup><thead><tr><th/><th colspan="9" align="center">Time of retail display (hours)</th><th/><th/></tr><tr><th>Trait</th><th>1</th><th>7</th><th>19</th><th>31</th><th>43</th><th>55</th><th>67</th><th>79</th><th>91</th><th>SEM</th><th><italic>P </italic>value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Bone marrow <italic>L&#x0002A;</italic></td><td>46.11<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab3-fn1"><sup>ab</sup></xref></td><td>45.56<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab3-fn1"><sup>abcd</sup></xref></td><td>44.83<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab3-fn1"><sup>cd</sup></xref></td><td>45.16<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab3-fn1"><sup>bcd</sup></xref></td><td>45.67<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab3-fn1"><sup>abc</sup></xref></td><td>46.52<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab3-fn1"><sup>a</sup></xref></td><td>45.25<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab3-fn1"><sup>bcd</sup></xref></td><td>45.23<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab3-fn1"><sup>bcd</sup></xref></td><td>44.45<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab3-fn1"><sup>d</sup></xref></td><td>0.92</td><td>0.001</td></tr><tr><td>Bone marrow <italic>a&#x0002A;</italic></td><td>20.01<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab3-fn1"><sup>a</sup></xref></td><td>17.01<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab3-fn1"><sup>b</sup></xref></td><td>13.52<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab3-fn1"><sup>cde</sup></xref></td><td>14.18<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab3-fn1"><sup>c</sup></xref></td><td>13.64<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab3-fn1"><sup>cd</sup></xref></td><td>13.21<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab3-fn1"><sup>def</sup></xref></td><td>12.75<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab3-fn1"><sup>f</sup></xref></td><td>13.46<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab3-fn1"><sup>cdef</sup></xref></td><td>12.79<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab3-fn1"><sup>ef</sup></xref></td><td>0.38</td><td>0.001</td></tr><tr><td>Bone marrow <italic>b&#x0002A;</italic></td><td>14.06<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab3-fn1"><sup>a</sup></xref></td><td>11.46<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab3-fn1"><sup>b</sup></xref></td><td>10.56<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab3-fn1"><sup>c</sup></xref></td><td>9.51<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab3-fn1"><sup>d</sup></xref></td><td>9.96<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab3-fn1"><sup>cd</sup></xref></td><td>10.00<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab3-fn1"><sup>cd</sup></xref></td><td>9.53<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab3-fn1"><sup>d</sup></xref></td><td>10.60<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab3-fn1"><sup>c</sup></xref></td><td>10.10<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab3-fn1"><sup>cd</sup></xref></td><td>0.27</td><td>0.001</td></tr><tr><td>Lean <italic>L&#x0002A;</italic></td><td>39.79<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab3-fn1"><sup>cd</sup></xref></td><td>39.46<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab3-fn1"><sup>d</sup></xref></td><td>40.55<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab3-fn1"><sup>bc</sup></xref></td><td>40.89<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab3-fn1"><sup>b</sup></xref></td><td>43.03<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab3-fn1"><sup>a</sup></xref></td><td>41.14<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab3-fn1"><sup>b</sup></xref></td><td>41.06<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab3-fn1"><sup>b</sup></xref></td><td>43.34<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab3-fn1"><sup>a</sup></xref></td><td>41.39<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab3-fn1"><sup>b</sup></xref></td><td>0.64</td><td>0.001</td></tr><tr><td>Lean <italic>a&#x0002A;</italic></td><td>21.77<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab3-fn1"><sup>a</sup></xref></td><td>20.47<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab3-fn1"><sup>c</sup></xref></td><td>22.00<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab3-fn1"><sup>a</sup></xref></td><td>21.56<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab3-fn1"><sup>ab</sup></xref></td><td>20.85<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab3-fn1"><sup>bc</sup></xref></td><td>20.68<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab3-fn1"><sup>c</sup></xref></td><td>20.78<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab3-fn1"><sup>bc</sup></xref></td><td>20.18<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab3-fn1"><sup>c</sup></xref></td><td>20.52<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab3-fn1"><sup>c</sup></xref></td><td>0.34</td><td>0.001</td></tr><tr><td>Lean <italic>b&#x0002A;</italic></td><td>15.25<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab3-fn1"><sup>a</sup></xref></td><td>11.59<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab3-fn1"><sup>f</sup></xref></td><td>14.89<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab3-fn1"><sup>ab</sup></xref></td><td>13.12<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab3-fn1"><sup>de</sup></xref></td><td>14.37<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab3-fn1"><sup>bc</sup></xref></td><td>12.81<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab3-fn1"><sup>e</sup></xref></td><td>13.77<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab3-fn1"><sup>cd</sup></xref></td><td>14.27<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab3-fn1"><sup>bc</sup></xref></td><td>12.62<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab3-fn1"><sup>e</sup></xref></td><td>0.33</td><td>0.001</td></tr><tr><td>Oxygenated lean color<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab3-fn2"><sup>1</sup></xref></td><td>3.5<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab3-fn1"><sup>f</sup></xref></td><td>3.7<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab3-fn1"><sup>e</sup></xref></td><td>4.0<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab3-fn1"><sup>d</sup></xref></td><td>4.1<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab3-fn1"><sup>d</sup></xref></td><td>4.4<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab3-fn1"><sup>c</sup></xref></td><td>4.6<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab3-fn1"><sup>c</sup></xref></td><td>4.7<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab3-fn1"><sup>b</sup></xref></td><td>4.9<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab3-fn1"><sup>a</sup></xref></td><td>5.0<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab3-fn1"><sup>a</sup></xref></td><td>0.2</td><td>0.001</td></tr><tr><td>Amount of browning<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab3-fn3"><sup>2</sup></xref></td><td>1.0<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab3-fn1"><sup>c</sup></xref></td><td>1.0<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab3-fn1"><sup>c</sup></xref></td><td>1.0<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab3-fn1"><sup>c</sup></xref></td><td>1.0<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab3-fn1"><sup>c</sup></xref></td><td>1.0<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab3-fn1"><sup>c</sup></xref></td><td>1.0<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab3-fn1"><sup>c</sup></xref></td><td>1.2<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab3-fn1"><sup>b</sup></xref></td><td>1.2<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab3-fn1"><sup>b</sup></xref></td><td>1.3<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab3-fn1"><sup>a</sup></xref></td><td>0.1</td><td>0.001</td></tr><tr><td>Discoloration<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab3-fn4"><sup>3</sup></xref></td><td>1.0<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab3-fn1"><sup>c</sup></xref></td><td>1.0<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab3-fn1"><sup>c</sup></xref></td><td>1.0<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab3-fn1"><sup>c</sup></xref></td><td>1.0<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab3-fn1"><sup>c</sup></xref></td><td>1.0<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab3-fn1"><sup>c</sup></xref></td><td>1.0<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab3-fn1"><sup>c</sup></xref></td><td>1.2<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab3-fn1"><sup>b</sup></xref></td><td>1.2<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab3-fn1"><sup>b</sup></xref></td><td>1.3<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab3-fn1"><sup>a</sup></xref></td><td>0.1</td><td>0.001</td></tr><tr><td>Surface discoloration<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab3-fn4"><sup>4</sup></xref></td><td>1.0<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab3-fn1"><sup>d</sup></xref></td><td>1.0<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab3-fn1"><sup>d</sup></xref></td><td>1.0<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab3-fn1"><sup>d</sup></xref></td><td>1.0<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab3-fn1"><sup>d</sup></xref></td><td>1.0<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab3-fn1"><sup>d</sup></xref></td><td>1.0<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab3-fn1"><sup>d</sup></xref></td><td>1.2<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab3-fn1"><sup>c</sup></xref></td><td>1.3<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab3-fn1"><sup>b</sup></xref></td><td>1.4<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab3-fn1"><sup>a</sup></xref></td><td>0.1</td><td>0.001</td></tr><tr><td>Color uniformity<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab3-fn6"><sup>5</sup></xref></td><td>1.1<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab3-fn1"><sup>e</sup></xref></td><td>1.0<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab3-fn1"><sup>e</sup></xref></td><td>1.2<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab3-fn1"><sup>d</sup></xref></td><td>1.2<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab3-fn1"><sup>d</sup></xref></td><td>1.3<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab3-fn1"><sup>c</sup></xref></td><td>1.4<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab3-fn1"><sup>c</sup></xref></td><td>1.5<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab3-fn1"><sup>b</sup></xref></td><td>1.6<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab3-fn1"><sup>b</sup></xref></td><td>1.7<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab3-fn1"><sup>a</sup></xref></td><td>0.1</td><td>0.001</td></tr><tr><td>Bone marrow color<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab3-fn7"><sup>6</sup></xref></td><td>1.9<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab3-fn1"><sup>g</sup></xref></td><td>2.8<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab3-fn1"><sup>f</sup></xref></td><td>3.4<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab3-fn1"><sup>d</sup></xref></td><td>3.3<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab3-fn1"><sup>e</sup></xref></td><td>3.4<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab3-fn1"><sup>e</sup></xref></td><td>3.4<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab3-fn1"><sup>de</sup></xref></td><td>3.9<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab3-fn1"><sup>c</sup></xref></td><td>4.0<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab3-fn1"><sup>b</sup></xref></td><td>4.4<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab3-fn1"><sup>a</sup></xref></td><td>0.1</td><td>0.001</td></tr></tbody></table><table-wrap-foot><fn id="tab3-fn1"><label><sup>a&#x02013;g</sup></label><p>Within a row, means without a common superscript differ (<italic>P</italic>&#x02009;&#x0003C;&#x02009;0.05).</p></fn><fn id="tab3-fn2"><label><sup>1</sup></label><p>Oxygenated lean color scale: 1&#x02009;&#x0003D;&#x02009;extremely bright cherry red, 8&#x02009;&#x0003D;&#x02009;extremely dark red.</p></fn><fn id="tab3-fn3"><label><sup>2</sup></label><p>Amount of browning scale: 1&#x02009;&#x0003D;&#x02009;no evidence of browning, 6&#x02009;&#x0003D;&#x02009;dark brown.</p></fn><fn id="tab3-fn4"><label><sup>3</sup></label><p>Discoloration scale: 1&#x02009;&#x0003D;&#x02009;none, 5&#x02009;&#x0003D;&#x02009;extreme.</p></fn><fn id="tab3-fn5"><label><sup>4</sup></label><p>Surface discoloration scale: 1&#x02009;&#x0003D;&#x02009;no discoloration (0%), 6&#x02009;&#x0003D;&#x02009;extensive discoloration (81% to 100%).</p></fn><fn id="tab3-fn6"><label><sup>5</sup></label><p>Color uniformity scale: 1&#x02009;&#x0003D;&#x02009;uniform no two-toning, 5&#x02009;&#x0003D;&#x02009;extreme two-toning.</p></fn><fn id="tab3-fn7"><label><sup>6</sup></label><p>Bone marrow color scale: 1&#x02009;&#x0003D;&#x02009;bright reddish pink to red, 7&#x02009;&#x0003D;&#x02009;black.</p></fn><fn id="tab3-fn8"><p>SEM&#x02009;&#x0003D;&#x02009;standard error of the mean.</p></fn></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap><p>When evaluating the lean tissue of the short ribs, an interaction between retail display time and treatment was not observed for <italic>L&#x0002A;</italic>, <italic>a&#x0002A;</italic>, or <italic>b&#x0002A;</italic> (<italic>P</italic>&#x02009;&#x0003D;&#x02009;0.354, <italic>P</italic>&#x02009;&#x0003D;&#x02009;0.925, and <italic>P</italic>&#x02009;&#x0003D;&#x02009;0.366, respectively). Additionally, there was not a difference in <italic>L&#x0002A;</italic>, <italic>a&#x0002A;</italic>, or <italic>b&#x0002A;</italic> between treatments (<italic>P</italic>&#x02009;&#x0003D;&#x02009;0.445, <italic>P</italic>&#x02009;&#x0003D;&#x02009;0.412, and <italic>P</italic>&#x02009;&#x0003D;&#x02009;0.855, respectively; Table&#x000A0;<xref ref-type="table" rid="tab1">1</xref>). However, it is important to note all treatments had redness values greater than 14.5, which is the threshold for consumers&#x02019; acceptability (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r13">Holman et&#x000A0;al., 2017</xref>). Throughout retail display, <italic>L&#x0002A;</italic>, <italic>a&#x0002A;</italic>, and <italic>b&#x0002A;</italic> values did differ (<italic>P</italic>&#x02009;&#x0003C;&#x02009;0.001, <italic>P</italic>&#x02009;&#x0003C;&#x02009;0.001, and <italic>P</italic>&#x02009;&#x0003C;&#x02009;0.001, respectively; Table&#x000A0;<xref ref-type="table" rid="tab3">3</xref>). Initial readings at 1&#x000A0;h were the darkest, reddest, and yellowest. Over time, steak lightness, redness, and yellowness fluctuated (<italic>P</italic>&#x02009;&#x0003C;&#x02009;0.05). Steaks initially became darker before becoming lighter at the end of retail display. Although there was a significant difference in redness, <italic>a</italic>&#x0002A; values fluctuate by only 1.82 points throughout retail display. Interestingly, <italic>b</italic>&#x0002A; values taken in the morning (1, 19, 43, 67, and 91&#x000A0;h) decreased consistently over the display period; however, <italic>b</italic>&#x0002A; values take in the evening (7, 31, 55, and 79&#x000A0;h) were inconsistent. Previously, aged steaks declined in redness and yellowness during retail display (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r4">Colle et&#x000A0;al., 2015</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r5">2016</xref>). Throughout retail display, steaks maintained redness above the acceptability threshold, greater than 14.5 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r13">Holman et&#x000A0;al., 2017</xref>).</p><p>For the chuck roll steaks, an interaction between retail display time and antioxidant treatment was not observed for <italic>L&#x0002A;</italic> (<italic>P</italic>&#x02009;&#x0003D;&#x02009;0.607) or <italic>b&#x0002A;</italic> (<italic>P</italic>&#x02009;&#x0003D;&#x02009;0.591), but there was an interaction between treatment and time for <italic>a&#x0002A;</italic> (<italic>P</italic>&#x02009;&#x0003D;&#x02009;0.018; Table&#x000A0;<xref ref-type="table" rid="tab4">4</xref>). In general, across all treatments, steak redness declined, or became less red, over time of retail display. This is consistent with G&#x000F3;mez et&#x000A0;al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r11">2016</xref>), who found redness decreased over retail display in ground beef patties regardless of antioxidant treatments. Additionally, McKenna et&#x000A0;al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r21">2005</xref>) found that redness declined during retail display in the SV muscle. At 1&#x000A0;h, 31&#x000A0;h, and 91&#x000A0;h of retail display, <italic>a&#x0002A;</italic> values did not differ between treatments. The control steaks were the least red treatment at hour 7 (<italic>P</italic>&#x02009;&#x0003C;&#x02009;0.05). All treatments throughout the entire retail display had redness values greater than 14.5, the threshold for consumers&#x02019; acceptability (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r13">Holman et&#x000A0;al., 2017</xref>). Antioxidant treatments differed in <italic>L&#x0002A;</italic> (<italic>P</italic>&#x02009;&#x0003C;&#x02009;0.001) but not <italic>b&#x0002A;</italic> (<italic>P</italic>&#x02009;&#x0003D;&#x02009;0.186; Table&#x000A0;<xref ref-type="table" rid="tab2">2</xref>). Steaks treated with C3 were darker (0.79 <italic>L&#x0002A;</italic> units) than the control steaks, which would likely be noticeable by customers at a retail case. Steak <italic>L&#x0002A;</italic> (<italic>P</italic>&#x02009;&#x0003C;&#x02009;0.001) and <italic>b&#x0002A;</italic> (<italic>P</italic>&#x02009;&#x0003C;&#x02009;0.001) values differed over time of retail display (Table&#x000A0;<xref ref-type="table" rid="tab5">5</xref>). Steaks were lightest 19&#x000A0;h into retail display and darkest after 43&#x000A0;h. Steaks were yellowest between 1 and 7&#x000A0;h of retail display. This observation is consistent with previous research in which aged steaks darkened and declined in yellowness during retail display (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r4">Colle et&#x000A0;al., 2015</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r5">2016</xref>).</p><table-wrap id="tab4"><label>Table 4.</label><caption><p>Topical antioxidant treatment by retail display time on chuck roll steak <italic>a&#x0002A;</italic> values (redness; <italic>n</italic>&#x02009;&#x0003D;&#x02009;63; SEM&#x02009;&#x0003D;&#x02009;0.79)</p></caption><table><colgroup><col align="left"/><col align="char" char="."/><col align="char" char="."/><col align="char" char="."/><col align="char" char="."/><col align="char" char="."/><col align="char" char="."/><col align="char" char="."/></colgroup><thead><tr><th/><th colspan="7" align="center">Topical antioxidant treatment<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab4-fn3"><sup>1</sup></xref></th></tr><tr><th align="left">Time of retail display (hours)</th><th>Control</th><th>C1</th><th>C2</th><th>C3</th><th>R1</th><th>R2</th><th>R3</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1</td><td>23.09<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab3-fn1 tab3-fn2"><sup>a,u</sup></xref></td><td>22.29<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab3-fn1 tab3-fn2"><sup>a,u</sup></xref></td><td>23.61<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab3-fn1 tab3-fn2"><sup>a,u</sup></xref></td><td>22.15<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab3-fn1 tab3-fn2"><sup>a,uv</sup></xref></td><td>23.80<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab3-fn1 tab3-fn2"><sup>a,u</sup></xref></td><td>23.69<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab3-fn1 tab3-fn2"><sup>a,u</sup></xref></td><td>23.78<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab3-fn1 tab3-fn2"><sup>a,uv</sup></xref></td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>22.21<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab3-fn1 tab3-fn2"><sup>b,uv</sup></xref></td><td>23.08<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab3-fn1 tab3-fn2"><sup>ab,u</sup></xref></td><td>23.68<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab3-fn1 tab3-fn2"><sup>ab,u</sup></xref></td><td>23.89<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab3-fn1 tab3-fn2"><sup>ab,u</sup></xref></td><td>25.00<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab3-fn1 tab3-fn2"><sup>a,u</sup></xref></td><td>23.44<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab3-fn1 tab3-fn2"><sup>ab,u</sup></xref></td><td>24.22<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab3-fn1 tab3-fn2"><sup>a,u</sup></xref></td></tr><tr><td>19</td><td>21.05<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab3-fn1 tab3-fn2"><sup>a,vw</sup></xref></td><td>18.86<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab3-fn1 tab3-fn2"><sup>b,vw</sup></xref></td><td>20.35<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab3-fn1 tab3-fn2"><sup>ab,v</sup></xref></td><td>22.24<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab3-fn1 tab3-fn2"><sup>a,uv</sup></xref></td><td>20.37<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab3-fn1 tab3-fn2"><sup>ab,v</sup></xref></td><td>21.96<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab3-fn1 tab3-fn2"><sup>a,uv</sup></xref></td><td>22.18<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab3-fn1 tab3-fn2"><sup>a,vw</sup></xref></td></tr><tr><td>31</td><td>21.70<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab3-fn1 tab3-fn2"><sup>a,uvw</sup></xref></td><td>19.96<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab3-fn1 tab3-fn2"><sup>a,vw</sup></xref></td><td>20.53<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab3-fn1 tab3-fn2"><sup>a,v</sup></xref></td><td>19.67<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab3-fn1 tab3-fn2"><sup>a,wx</sup></xref></td><td>20.49<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab3-fn1 tab3-fn2"><sup>a,v</sup></xref></td><td>20.97<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab3-fn1 tab3-fn2"><sup>a,v</sup></xref></td><td>20.75<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab3-fn1 tab3-fn2"><sup>a,w</sup></xref></td></tr><tr><td>43</td><td>19.80<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab3-fn1 tab3-fn2"><sup>ab,wx</sup></xref></td><td>18.32<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab3-fn1 tab3-fn2"><sup>ab,wx</sup></xref></td><td>19.21<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab3-fn1 tab3-fn2"><sup>ab,vw</sup></xref></td><td>20.41<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab3-fn1 tab3-fn2"><sup>a,vw</sup></xref></td><td>19.61<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab3-fn1 tab3-fn2"><sup>ab,v</sup></xref></td><td>18.19<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab3-fn1 tab3-fn2"><sup>b,w</sup></xref></td><td>18.63<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab3-fn1 tab3-fn2"><sup>ab,x</sup></xref></td></tr><tr><td>55</td><td>18.14<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab3-fn1 tab3-fn2"><sup>ab,xy</sup></xref></td><td>16.16<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab3-fn1 tab3-fn2"><sup>bc,y</sup></xref></td><td>15.88<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab3-fn1 tab3-fn2"><sup>c,y</sup></xref></td><td>18.35<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab3-fn1 tab3-fn2"><sup>a,xy</sup></xref></td><td>16.73<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab3-fn1 tab3-fn2"><sup>abc,w</sup></xref></td><td>17.10<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab3-fn1 tab3-fn2"><sup>abc,wx</sup></xref></td><td>16.07<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab3-fn1 tab3-fn2"><sup>c,z</sup></xref></td></tr><tr><td>67</td><td>16.94<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab3-fn1 tab3-fn2"><sup>abc,yz</sup></xref></td><td>16.84<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab3-fn1 tab3-fn2"><sup>abc,xy</sup></xref></td><td>17.76<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab3-fn1 tab3-fn2"><sup>a,wxy</sup></xref></td><td>17.40<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab3-fn1 tab3-fn2"><sup>ab,yz</sup></xref></td><td>15.31<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab3-fn1 tab3-fn2"><sup>bc,w</sup></xref></td><td>15.30<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab3-fn1 tab3-fn2"><sup>c,x</sup></xref></td><td>18.22<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab3-fn1 tab3-fn2"><sup>a,xy</sup></xref></td></tr><tr><td>79</td><td>16.03<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab3-fn1 tab3-fn2"><sup>ab,z</sup></xref></td><td>15.90<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab3-fn1 tab3-fn2"><sup>ab,y</sup></xref></td><td>17.97<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab3-fn1 tab3-fn2"><sup>a,wx</sup></xref></td><td>16.19<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab3-fn1 tab3-fn2"><sup>ab,z</sup></xref></td><td>16.74<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab3-fn1 tab3-fn2"><sup>ab,w</sup></xref></td><td>15.64<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab3-fn1 tab3-fn2"><sup>b,x</sup></xref></td><td>16.37<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab3-fn1 tab3-fn2"><sup>ab,y</sup></xref></td></tr><tr><td>91</td><td>16.75<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab3-fn1 tab3-fn2"><sup>a,yz</sup></xref></td><td>16.44<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab3-fn1 tab3-fn2"><sup>a,xy</sup></xref></td><td>16.06<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab3-fn1 tab3-fn2"><sup>a,xy</sup></xref></td><td>15.43<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab3-fn1 tab3-fn2"><sup>a,z</sup></xref></td><td>14.81<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab3-fn1 tab3-fn2"><sup>a,w</sup></xref></td><td>16.34<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab3-fn1 tab3-fn2"><sup>a,wx</sup></xref></td><td>16.46<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab3-fn1 tab3-fn2"><sup>a,y</sup></xref></td></tr></tbody></table><table-wrap-foot><fn id="tab4-fn1"><label><sup>abc</sup></label><p>Within a row, means without a common superscript differ (<italic>P</italic>&#x02009;&#x0003C;&#x02009;0.05).</p></fn><fn id="tab4-fn2"><label><sup>u&#x02013;z</sup></label><p>Within a column, means without a common superscript differ (<italic>P</italic>&#x02009;&#x0003C;&#x02009;0.05).</p></fn><fn id="tab4-fn3"><label><sup>1</sup></label><p>Treatments included an untreated control (C), topically sprayed (2&#x000A0;mL) with a 0.05% acerola cherry powder solution from 1 of 3 suppliers (C1, C2, or C3), or topically sprayed (2&#x000A0;mL) with a 0.10% rosemary extract solution from 1 of 3 suppliers (R1, R2, or R3).</p></fn><fn id="tab4-fn4"><p>SEM&#x02009;&#x0003D;&#x02009;standard error of the mean.</p></fn></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap><table-wrap id="tab5"><label>Table 5.</label><caption><p>Estimated mean effects of retail display time on chuck roll steak color (<italic>n</italic>&#x02009;&#x0003D;&#x02009;63)</p></caption><table><colgroup><col align="left"/><col align="char" char="."/><col align="char" char="."/><col align="char" char="."/><col align="char" char="."/><col align="char" char="."/><col align="char" char="."/><col align="char" char="."/><col align="char" char="."/><col align="char" char="."/><col align="char" char="."/><col align="char" char="."/></colgroup><thead><tr><th/><th colspan="9" align="center">Time of retail display (hours)</th><th/><th/></tr><tr><th>Trait</th><th>1</th><th>7</th><th>19</th><th>31</th><th>43</th><th>55</th><th>67</th><th>79</th><th>91</th><th>SEM</th><th><italic>P</italic> value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><italic>L&#x0002A;</italic></td><td>39.31<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab5-fn1"><sup>bc</sup></xref></td><td>39.19<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab5-fn1"><sup>bc</sup></xref></td><td>40.72<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab5-fn1"><sup>a</sup></xref></td><td>39.16<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab5-fn1"><sup>bcd</sup></xref></td><td>38.22<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab5-fn1"><sup>e</sup></xref></td><td>39.78<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab5-fn1"><sup>b</sup></xref></td><td>38.68<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab5-fn1"><sup>cde</sup></xref></td><td>38.31<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab5-fn1"><sup>de</sup></xref></td><td>38.88<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab5-fn1"><sup>cde</sup></xref></td><td>0.99</td><td>0.001</td></tr><tr><td><italic>b&#x0002A;</italic></td><td>15.73<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab5-fn1"><sup>a</sup></xref></td><td>15.25<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab5-fn1"><sup>a</sup></xref></td><td>15.09<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab5-fn1"><sup>ab</sup></xref></td><td>14.02<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab5-fn1"><sup>c</sup></xref></td><td>13.95<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab5-fn1"><sup>c</sup></xref></td><td>14.59<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab5-fn1"><sup>bc</sup></xref></td><td>12.76<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab5-fn1"><sup>d</sup></xref></td><td>12.27<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab5-fn1"><sup>d</sup></xref></td><td>12.14<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab5-fn1"><sup>d</sup></xref></td><td>0.32</td><td>0.001</td></tr><tr><td>Oxygenated lean color<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab5-fn2"><sup>1</sup></xref></td><td>4.1<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab5-fn1"><sup>h</sup></xref></td><td>4.3<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab5-fn1"><sup>g</sup></xref></td><td>4.9<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab5-fn1"><sup>f</sup></xref></td><td>5.3<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab5-fn1"><sup>e</sup></xref></td><td>5.4<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab5-fn1"><sup>d</sup></xref></td><td>5.6<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab5-fn1"><sup>c</sup></xref></td><td>5.9<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab5-fn1"><sup>b</sup></xref></td><td>6.0<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab5-fn1"><sup>a</sup></xref></td><td>6.1<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab5-fn1"><sup>a</sup></xref></td><td>0.2</td><td>0.001</td></tr><tr><td>Amount of browning<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab5-fn3"><sup>2</sup></xref></td><td>1.0<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab5-fn1"><sup>h</sup></xref></td><td>1.0<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab5-fn1"><sup>h</sup></xref></td><td>1.8<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab5-fn1"><sup>g</sup></xref></td><td>2.2<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab5-fn1"><sup>f</sup></xref></td><td>2.8<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab5-fn1"><sup>e</sup></xref></td><td>3.3<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab5-fn1"><sup>d</sup></xref></td><td>3.7<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab5-fn1"><sup>c</sup></xref></td><td>4.0<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab5-fn1"><sup>b</sup></xref></td><td>4.3<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab5-fn1"><sup>a</sup></xref></td><td>0.1</td><td>0.001</td></tr><tr><td>Discoloration<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab5-fn4"><sup>3</sup></xref></td><td>1.0<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab5-fn1"><sup>h</sup></xref></td><td>1.0<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab5-fn1"><sup>h</sup></xref></td><td>1.5<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab5-fn1"><sup>g</sup></xref></td><td>2.0<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab5-fn1"><sup>f</sup></xref></td><td>2.5<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab5-fn1"><sup>e</sup></xref></td><td>3.1<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab5-fn1"><sup>d</sup></xref></td><td>3.6<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab5-fn1"><sup>c</sup></xref></td><td>4.0<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab5-fn1"><sup>b</sup></xref></td><td>4.3<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab5-fn1"><sup>a</sup></xref></td><td>0.1</td><td>0.001</td></tr><tr><td>Surface discoloration<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab5-fn5"><sup>4</sup></xref></td><td>1.0<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab5-fn1"><sup>h</sup></xref></td><td>1.0<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab5-fn1"><sup>h</sup></xref></td><td>1.7<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab5-fn1"><sup>g</sup></xref></td><td>2.1<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab5-fn1"><sup>f</sup></xref></td><td>2.8<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab5-fn1"><sup>e</sup></xref></td><td>3.5<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab5-fn1"><sup>d</sup></xref></td><td>3.8<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab5-fn1"><sup>c</sup></xref></td><td>4.3<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab5-fn1"><sup>b</sup></xref></td><td>4.5<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab5-fn1"><sup>a</sup></xref></td><td>0.1</td><td>0.001</td></tr><tr><td>Color uniformity<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab5-fn6"><sup>5</sup></xref></td><td>1.5<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab5-fn1"><sup>i</sup></xref></td><td>1.7<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab5-fn1"><sup>h</sup></xref></td><td>2.2<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab5-fn1"><sup>g</sup></xref></td><td>2.3<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab5-fn1"><sup>f</sup></xref></td><td>2.6<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab5-fn1"><sup>e</sup></xref></td><td>3.0<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab5-fn1"><sup>d</sup></xref></td><td>3.3<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab5-fn1"><sup>c</sup></xref></td><td>3.7<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab5-fn1"><sup>b</sup></xref></td><td>3.9<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab5-fn1"><sup>a</sup></xref></td><td>0.1</td><td>0.001</td></tr></tbody></table><table-wrap-foot><fn id="tab5-fn1"><label><sup>a&#x02013;i</sup></label><p>Within a row, means without a common superscript differ (<italic>P</italic>&#x02009;&#x0003C;&#x02009;0.05).</p></fn><fn id="tab5-fn2"><label><sup>1</sup></label><p>Oxygenated lean color scale: 1&#x02009;&#x0003D;&#x02009;extremely bright cherry red, 8&#x02009;&#x0003D;&#x02009;extremely dark red.</p></fn><fn id="tab5-fn3"><label><sup>2</sup></label><p>Amount of browning scale: 1&#x02009;&#x0003D;&#x02009;no evidence of browning, 6&#x02009;&#x0003D;&#x02009;dark brown.</p></fn><fn id="tab5-fn4"><label><sup>3</sup></label><p>Discoloration scale: 1&#x02009;&#x0003D;&#x02009;none, 5&#x02009;&#x0003D;&#x02009;extreme.</p></fn><fn id="tab5-fn5"><label><sup>4</sup></label><p>Surface discoloration scale: 1&#x02009;&#x0003D;&#x02009;no discoloration (0%), 6&#x02009;&#x0003D;&#x02009;extensive discoloration (81% to 100%).</p></fn><fn id="tab5-fn6"><label><sup>5</sup></label><p>Color uniformity scale: 1&#x02009;&#x0003D;&#x02009;uniform no two-toning, 5&#x02009;&#x0003D;&#x02009;extreme two-toning.</p></fn><fn id="tab5-fn7"><p>SEM&#x02009;&#x0003D;&#x02009;standard error of the mean.</p></fn></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap></sec><sec id="sec3.3"><title>Retail subjective color</title><p>In the short rib steaks, oxygenated lean color (<italic>P</italic>&#x02009;&#x0003C;&#x02009;0.001) differed between treatments (Table&#x000A0;<xref ref-type="table" rid="tab1">1</xref>). Steaks treated with antioxidants had a brighter oxygenated lean color than the control steaks. This supports the findings that ascorbic acid found in acerola cherry powder extends shelf life by delaying myoglobin oxidation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r6">Buettner and Jerkiewicz, 1996</xref>). Interestingly, these results were not reflected when evaluating <italic>a&#x0002A;</italic> (objective redness), which was possibly due to how small the subjective color measurements differed numerically. Antioxidants did not impact amount of browning (<italic>P</italic>&#x02009;&#x0003D;&#x02009;0.202), discoloration (<italic>P</italic>&#x02009;&#x0003D;&#x02009;0.262), surface discoloration (<italic>P</italic>&#x02009;&#x0003D;&#x02009;0.491), color uniformity (<italic>P</italic>&#x02009;&#x0003D;&#x02009;0.307), or bone marrow color (<italic>P</italic>&#x02009;&#x0003D;&#x02009;0.235; Table&#x000A0;<xref ref-type="table" rid="tab1">1</xref>). Throughout retail display, there were changes in oxygenated lean color (<italic>P</italic>&#x02009;&#x0003C;&#x02009;0.001), amount of browning (<italic>P</italic>&#x02009;&#x0003C;&#x02009;0.001), discoloration (<italic>P</italic>&#x02009;&#x0003C;&#x02009;0.001), surface discoloration (<italic>P</italic>&#x02009;&#x0003C;&#x02009;0.001), color uniformity (<italic>P</italic>&#x02009;&#x0003C;&#x02009;0.001), and bone marrow color (<italic>P</italic>&#x02009;&#x0003C;&#x02009;0.001; Table&#x000A0;<xref ref-type="table" rid="tab3">3</xref>). Oxygenated lean color darkened over retail display, with steaks being the brightest at the initial evaluation at 1&#x000A0;h and darkest at 79 and 91&#x000A0;h. Bone marrow color had the lowest score, or most desirable appearance, at the initial evaluation at 1&#x000A0;h. Steaks were the most uniform in color at hour 1 and hour 7. Until 55&#x000A0;h of retail display, steaks maintained a score of 1 in amount of browning, discoloration, and surface discoloration (no browning, no discoloration, and 0% metmyoglobin, respectively). Except for oxygenated lean color, all subjective color categories had the highest (least desirable) score at the final evaluation at 91&#x000A0;h. This observation supports previous research where aged steaks discolored during retail display (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r4">Colle et&#x000A0;al., 2015</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r5">2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r8">English et&#x000A0;al., 2016</xref>).</p><p>Antioxidant treatments did not differ in chuck roll steak oxygenated lean color (<italic>P</italic>&#x02009;&#x0003D;&#x02009;0.373), amount of browning (<italic>P</italic>&#x02009;&#x0003D;&#x02009;0.801), discoloration (<italic>P</italic>&#x02009;&#x0003D;&#x02009;0.924), surface discoloration (<italic>P</italic>&#x02009;&#x0003D;&#x02009;0.584), or color uniformity (<italic>P</italic>&#x02009;&#x0003D;&#x02009;0.552; Table&#x000A0;<xref ref-type="table" rid="tab2">2</xref>). Throughout retail display, oxygenated lean color (<italic>P</italic>&#x02009;&#x0003C;&#x02009;0.001), amount of browning (<italic>P</italic>&#x02009;&#x0003C;&#x02009;0.001), discoloration (<italic>P</italic>&#x02009;&#x0003C;&#x02009;0.001), surface discoloration (<italic>P</italic>&#x02009;&#x0003C;&#x02009;0.001), and color uniformity (<italic>P</italic>&#x02009;&#x0003C;&#x02009;0.001) values differed (Table&#x000A0;<xref ref-type="table" rid="tab5">5</xref>). Steaks had the brightest oxygenated lean color and were most uniform in color at the initial evaluation. Steaks had the least amount of browning, discoloration, and surface discoloration at the initial evaluation and after 7&#x000A0;h of retail display. Steaks had the darkest oxygenated lean color at 79 and 91&#x000A0;h. For all remaining subjective color measurements, steaks had the least favorable evaluation after 4 d of retail display. Throughout retail display, lean color brightness and color uniformity decreased, whereas amount of browning, discoloration, and surface discoloration increased. This observation is consistent with previous research in which aged steaks discolored during retail display (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r4">Colle et&#x000A0;al., 2015</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r5">2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r8">English et&#x000A0;al., 2016</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="sec3.4"><title>Metmyoglobin-reducing activity</title><p>There was an interaction for short rib steaks between retail display and treatment (<italic>P</italic>&#x02009;&#x0003D;&#x02009;0.028; Figure&#x000A0;<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">1</xref>). None of the antioxidant-treated steaks were significantly different than the control steaks on day 0 or day 4. Within treatment, MRA decreased from day 0 to day 4 for the control steaks and steaks treated with C1, C2, R1, and R3 (<italic>P</italic>&#x02009;&#x0003C;&#x02009;0.05). Steaks treated with C3 and R2 did not differ in MRA from day 0 to day 4 of retail display (<italic>P</italic>&#x02009;&#x0003E;&#x02009;0.05). There was also an interaction observed in the chuck roll steaks between retail display and treatment in MRA (<italic>P</italic>&#x02009;&#x0003C;&#x02009;0.001; Figure&#x000A0;<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">2</xref>). On day 0 of retail display, steaks treated with C1, C2, C3, R2, and R3 all had a higher, or more desirable, MRA than the control steaks (<italic>P</italic>&#x02009;&#x0003C;&#x02009;0.05). However, on day 4, antioxidant-treated steaks did not have improved MRA compared to the control steaks (<italic>P</italic>&#x02009;&#x0003E;&#x02009;0.05). Measuring MRA daily throughout retail display could determine the number of days that antioxidant-treated steaks had superior MRA. As expected, all treatments decreased in MRA from day 0 to day 4 (<italic>P</italic>&#x02009;&#x0003C;&#x02009;0.05). MRA decreases over time due to decreasing nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NADH) levels postmortem and causes increased levels of metmyoglobin (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r24">Sammel et&#x000A0;al., 2002</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r2">AMSA, 2012</xref>). Additionally, as aging time increases, initial MRA decreases, creating further color stability challenges (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r8">English et&#x000A0;al., 2016</xref>). Utilizing antioxidants to increase MRA on day 4 could improve color stability of meat by delaying the onset of browning.</p><fig id="f1"><label>Figure 1.</label><caption><p>Metmyoglobin-reducing activity (MRA) values for antioxidant treatment by retail display time for bone-in short rib steaks (<italic>n</italic>&#x02009;&#x0003D;&#x02009;63). Each steak was randomly assigned based on location to be an untreated control (C), topically sprayed (2&#x000A0;mL) with a 0.05% acerola cherry powder solution from 1 of 3 suppliers (C1, C2, or C3), or topically sprayed (2&#x000A0;mL) with a 0.10% rosemary extract solution from 1 of 3 suppliers (R1, R2, or R3). Steaks were overwrapped with an oxygen-permeable polyvinyl chloride film and displayed in a retail display room at 2&#x000B0;C for 4 d. MRA was determined on day 0 and day 4 of retail display for the control and each antioxidant treatment with the following equation: MRA&#x02009;&#x0003D;&#x02009;[(Initial % metmyoglobin&#x02009;&#x02212;&#x02009;Final % metmyoglobin) &#x000F7; Initial % metmyoglobin]&#x02009;&#x000D7;&#x02009;100. Values are shown as least square means&#x02009;&#x000B1;&#x02009;standard error. <sup>a&#x02013;d</sup>Within a day, means without a common superscript differ (<italic>P</italic>&#x02009;&#x0003C;&#x02009;0.05). <sup>x,y</sup>Within a treatment, means without a common superscript differ (<italic>P</italic>&#x02009;&#x0003C;&#x02009;0.05).</p></caption><graphic xlink:href="1.png"/></fig><fig id="f2"><label>Figure 2.</label><caption><p>Metmyoglobin-reducing activity (MRA) values for antioxidant treatment by retail display time for chuck roll steaks (<italic>n</italic>&#x02009;&#x0003D;&#x02009;63). Each steak was randomly assigned based on location to be an untreated control (C), topically sprayed (2&#x000A0;mL) with a 0.05% acerola cherry powder solution from 1 of 3 suppliers (C1, C2, or C3), or topically sprayed (2&#x000A0;mL) with a 0.10% rosemary extract solution from 1 of 3 suppliers (R1, R2, or R3). Steaks were overwrapped with an oxygen-permeable polyvinyl chloride film and displayed in a retail display room at 2&#x000B0;C for 4 d. MRA was determined on day 0 and day 4 of retail display for the control and each antioxidant treatment with the following equation: MRA&#x02009;&#x0003D;&#x02009;[(Initial % metmyoglobin&#x02009;&#x02212;&#x02009;Final % metmyoglobin) &#x000F7; Initial % metmyoglobin]&#x02009;&#x000D7;&#x02009;100. Values are shown as least square means&#x02009;&#x000B1;&#x02009;standard error. <sup>a&#x02013;f</sup>Means without a common superscript differ (<italic>P</italic>&#x02009;&#x0003C;&#x02009;0.05).</p></caption><graphic xlink:href="2.png"/></fig></sec><sec id="sec3.5"><title>Oxygen consumption</title><p>Treatments did not impact short rib steak OC (<italic>P</italic>&#x02009;&#x0003D;&#x02009;0.224; Table&#x000A0;<xref ref-type="table" rid="tab1">1</xref>). Similarly, in chuck roll steaks, treatments did not impact OC (<italic>P</italic>&#x02009;&#x0003D;&#x02009;0.053; Table&#x000A0;<xref ref-type="table" rid="tab2">2</xref>). Previous research also did not see changes in OC caused by antioxidants (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r6">Colle et&#x000A0;al., 2019</xref>). The ability to maintain moderate OC throughout retail display could stabilize color by regenerating NADH levels for MRA without reducing the oxygen partial pressure at the surface (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r24">Sammel et&#x000A0;al., 2002</xref>). Mitochondria generate NADH after consuming oxygen to produce energy (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r19">Mancini and Ramanathan, 2014</xref>). Unfortunately, with longer shelf-life periods, OC by mitochondria would be difficult to quantify because of potential oxygen-consuming microorganisms and oxygen involved in lipid oxidation.</p></sec><sec id="sec3.6"><title>Lipid oxidation</title><p>There was not an interaction in short rib steaks between day of retail display and treatment (<italic>P</italic>&#x02009;&#x0003D;&#x02009;0.191) or a treatment influence on lipid oxidation (<italic>P</italic>&#x02009;&#x0003D;&#x02009;0.323; Table&#x000A0;<xref ref-type="table" rid="tab1">1</xref>). Also, in the chuck roll steaks, a retail display by treatment interaction (<italic>P</italic>&#x02009;&#x0003D;&#x02009;0.829) was not observed. Furthermore, a difference in lipid oxidation between treatments was not observed (<italic>P</italic>&#x02009;&#x0003D;&#x02009;0.276; Table&#x000A0;<xref ref-type="table" rid="tab2">2</xref>). Similar results were found in the <italic>Semimembranosus</italic> and <italic>Longissimus lumborum</italic> when ascorbic acid and rosemary extract were topically applied (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r6">Colle et&#x000A0;al., 2019</xref>). Other previous research has shown a delay in lipid oxidation; however, in these studies, the antioxidants were mixed into a ground product (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r14">Ismail et&#x000A0;al., 2009</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r15">Kim et&#x000A0;al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r11">G&#x000F3;mez et&#x000A0;al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r29">Zhang et&#x000A0;al., 2016</xref>). Previously, adding vitamin E to cattle diets decreased lipid oxidation in ground beef after 6 d of retail display (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r9">Faustman et&#x000A0;al., 1989</xref>). Vitamin E works to delay lipid oxidation by quenching free radicals created by oxidizing fatty acids (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r22">Murray et&#x000A0;al., 2006</xref>). Increasing the penetration depth of antioxidants into steaks could delay the oxidation of lipids below the steak surface without having to adjust US feeding strategies. Additionally, decreasing lipid oxidation would prevent myoglobin oxidation and, thus, steak discoloration (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r18">Mancini and Hunt, 2005</xref>). As anticipated, lipid oxidation increased in short rib steaks (<italic>P</italic>&#x02009;&#x0003C;&#x02009;0.001) from day 0 to day 4 of retail display (0.15 to 0.78&#x000A0;mg malondialdehyde/kg meat, respectively) and chuck roll steaks (<italic>P</italic>&#x02009;&#x0003C;&#x02009;0.001) from day 0 to day 4 of retail display (0.31 to 1.00&#x000A0;mg malondialdehyde/kg meat, respectively), similar to previous research (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r15">Kim et&#x000A0;al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r6">Colle et&#x000A0;al., 2019</xref>). The lipid oxidation threshold for the ability of consumers to detect off-flavors in meat is TBARS&#x02009;&#x0003E;&#x02009;1.0 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r25">Tarladgis et&#x000A0;al., 1960</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r12">Greene and Cumuze, 1981</xref>). It is important to note that in short rib steaks on day 4 of retail display, none of the treatments were above the lipid oxidation threshold. However, in the chuck roll steaks on day 4 of retail display, the control steaks and steaks treated with C1, C3, R1, and R2 were above the lipid oxidation threshold with values of 1.09, 1.01, 1.05, 1.03, and 1.07, respectively. Further research is needed to collect consumer sensory data to determine if off-flavors are detectable under the experimental conditions of the present study.</p></sec></sec><sec id="sec4"><title>Conclusion</title><p>During retail display antioxidant treatments of acerola cherry powder and rosemary extract improved beef bone-in short rib bone marrow redness as well as beef chuck roll MRA when aged 28 d postfabrication. Simple topical applications at a retail meat merchandising setting following extended aging, either due to lengthy storage or transportation duration, can extend the shelf-life stability of fresh beef bone-in short ribs and chuck rolls. Further research is needed to determine if utilizing antioxidants in combination with one another will further extend shelf life. Additional investigation of using acerola cherry powder and rosemary extract in higher concentrations may further delay myoglobin and lipid oxidation.</p></sec></body><back><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>This research was funded by The Beef Checkoff. We gratefully acknowledge financial support from Checkoff dollars provided by the Idaho Beef Council. Support for this research project was also provided by the Idaho Agriculture Experiment Station. We are also appreciative for the personnel at the University of Idaho Vandal Brand Meats Lab that made this research possible.</p></ack><ref-list><title>Literature Cited</title><ref id="r1"><mixed-citation publication-type="other"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Aberle</surname>, <given-names>E. D.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>J. C.</given-names> <surname>Forrest</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>D. E.</given-names> <surname>Gerrard</surname></string-name>, and <string-name><given-names>E. W.</given-names> <surname>Mills</surname></string-name></person-group>. <year>2012</year>. <publisher-name>Principles of meat science.</publisher-name> <edition>5th ed</edition>. <publisher-name>Kendall Hunt Publ. Co.</publisher-name>, <publisher-loc>Dubuque, IA</publisher-loc>.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="r2"><mixed-citation publication-type="book"><collab>AMSA</collab>. <year>2012</year>. <source>Meat color measurement guidelines</source>. <edition>2nd ed</edition>. <publisher-name>American Meat Science Association</publisher-name>, <publisher-loc>Champaign, IL</publisher-loc>.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="r3"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Buettner</surname>, <given-names>G. R.</given-names></string-name>, and <string-name><given-names>B. A.</given-names> <surname>Jurkiewicz</surname></string-name></person-group>. <year>1996</year>. <article-title>Catalytic metals, ascorbate and free radicals: Combinations to avoid</article-title>. <source>Radiat. Res</source>. <volume>145</volume>:<fpage>532</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>541</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.2307/3579271</pub-id>.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="r4"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Colle</surname>, <given-names>M. J.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>R. P.</given-names> <surname>Richard</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>K. M.</given-names> <surname>Killinger</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>J. C.</given-names> <surname>Bohlscheid</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>A. R.</given-names> <surname>Gray</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>W. I.</given-names> <surname>Loucks</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>R. N.</given-names> <surname>Day</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>A. S.</given-names> <surname>Cochran</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>J. A.</given-names> <surname>Nasados</surname></string-name>, and <string-name><given-names>M. E.</given-names> <surname>Doumit</surname></string-name></person-group>. <year>2015</year>. <article-title>Influence of extended aging on beef quality characteristics and sensory perception of steaks from the <italic>gluteus medius</italic> and <italic>longissimus lumborum</italic></article-title>. <source>Meat Sci</source>. <volume>110</volume>:<fpage>32</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>39</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2015.06.013</pub-id>.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="r5"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Colle</surname>, <given-names>M. J.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>R. P.</given-names> <surname>Richard</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>K. M.</given-names> <surname>Killinger</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>J. C.</given-names> <surname>Bohlscheid</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>A. R.</given-names> <surname>Gray</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>W. I.</given-names> <surname>Loucks</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>R. N.</given-names> <surname>Day</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>A. S.</given-names> <surname>Cochran</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>J. A.</given-names> <surname>Nasados</surname></string-name>, and <string-name><given-names>M. E.</given-names> <surname>Doumit</surname></string-name></person-group>. <year>2016</year>. <article-title>Influence of extended aging on beef quality characteristics and sensory perception of steaks from the <italic>biceps femoris</italic> and <italic>semimembranosus</italic></article-title>. <source>Meat Sci</source>. <volume>119</volume>:<fpage>110</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>117</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2016.04.028</pub-id>.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="r6"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Colle</surname>, <given-names>M. J.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>R. P.</given-names> <surname>Richard</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>M. C.</given-names> <surname>Colle</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>W. I.</given-names> <surname>Loucks</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>G. K.</given-names> <surname>Murdoch</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>P. D.</given-names> <surname>Bass</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>C. J.</given-names> <surname>Williams</surname></string-name>, and <string-name><given-names>M. E.</given-names> <surname>Doumit</surname></string-name></person-group>. <year>2019</year>. <article-title>Retail display properties and consumer perception of extended aged beef topically treated with ascorbic acid and rosemary extract</article-title>. <source>Meat Muscle Biol</source>. <volume>3</volume>:<fpage>42</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>50</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.22175/mmb2018.05.0011</pub-id>.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="r7"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Djenane</surname>, <given-names>D.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>A.</given-names> <surname>S&#x000E1;nchez-Escalante</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>J. A.</given-names> <surname>Beltr&#x000E1;n</surname></string-name>, and <string-name><given-names>P.</given-names> <surname>Roncal&#x000E9;s</surname></string-name></person-group>. <year>2003</year>. <article-title>The shelf-life of beef steaks treated with DL-lactic acid and antioxidants and stored under modified atmospheres</article-title>. <source>Food Microbiol</source>. <volume>20</volume>:<fpage>1</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>7</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0740-0020(02)00138-7</pub-id>.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="r8"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>English</surname>, <given-names>A. R.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>G. G.</given-names> <surname>Mafi</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>D. L.</given-names> <surname>VanOverbeke</surname></string-name>, and <string-name><given-names>R.</given-names> <surname>Ramanathan</surname></string-name></person-group>. <year>2016</year>. <article-title>Effects of extended aging and modified atmospheric packaging on beef top loin steak color</article-title>. <source>J. Anim. Sci</source>. <volume>94</volume>:<fpage>1727</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>1737</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2015-0149</pub-id>.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="r9"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Faustman</surname>, <given-names>C.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>R. G.</given-names> <surname>Cassens</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>D. M.</given-names> <surname>Schaefer</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>D. R.</given-names> <surname>Buege</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>S. N.</given-names> <surname>Williams</surname></string-name>, and <string-name><given-names>K. K.</given-names> <surname>Scheller</surname></string-name></person-group>. <year>1989</year>. <article-title>Improvement of pigment and lipid stability in Holstein steer beef by dietary supplementation with vitamin E</article-title>. <source>J. Food Sci</source>. <volume>54</volume>:<fpage>858</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>862</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1989.tb07899.x</pub-id>.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="r10"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Gill</surname>, <given-names>C. O.</given-names></string-name> </person-group><year>1996</year>. <article-title>Extending the storage life of raw chilled meats</article-title>. <source>Meat Sci</source>. <volume>43</volume>:<fpage>99</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>109</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1016/0309-1740(96)00058-7</pub-id>.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="r11"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>G&#x000F3;mez</surname>, <given-names>I.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>M. J.</given-names> <surname>Beriain</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>J. A.</given-names> <surname>Mendizabal</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>C.</given-names> <surname>Realini</surname></string-name>, and <string-name><given-names>A.</given-names> <surname>Purroy</surname></string-name></person-group>. <year>2016</year>. <article-title>Shelf life of ground beef enriched with omega-3 and/or conjugated linoleic acid and use of grape seed extract to inhibit lipid oxidation</article-title>. <source>Food Science &#x00026; Nutrition</source>. <volume>4</volume>:<fpage>67</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>79</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.251</pub-id>.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="r12"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Greene</surname>, <given-names>B. E.</given-names></string-name>, and <string-name><given-names>T. H.</given-names> <surname>Cumuze</surname></string-name></person-group>. <year>1981</year>. <article-title>Relationship between TBA numbers and inexperienced panelists&#x02019; assessment of oxidized flavor in cooked beef</article-title>. <source>J. Food Sci</source>. <volume>47</volume>:<fpage>52</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>54</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1982.tb11025.x</pub-id>.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="r13"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Holman</surname>, <given-names>B. W. B.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>R. J.</given-names> <surname>van de Ven</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>Y.</given-names> <surname>Mao</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>C. E. O.</given-names> <surname>Coombs</surname></string-name>, and <string-name><given-names>D. L.</given-names> <surname>Hopkins</surname></string-name></person-group>. <year>2017</year>. <article-title>Using instrumental (CIE and reflectance) measures to predict consumers&#x02019; acceptance of beef colour</article-title>. <source>Meat Sci</source>. <volume>127</volume>:<fpage>57</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>62</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2017.01.005</pub-id>.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="r14"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Ismail</surname>, <given-names>H. A.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>E. J.</given-names> <surname>Lee</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>K. Y.</given-names> <surname>Ko</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>H. D.</given-names> <surname>Paik</surname></string-name>, and <string-name><given-names>D. U.</given-names> <surname>Ahn</surname></string-name></person-group>. <year>2009</year>. <article-title>Effect of antioxidant application methods on the color, lipid oxidation, and volatiles of irradiated ground beef</article-title>. <source>J. Food Sci</source>. <volume>74</volume>:<fpage>C25</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>C32</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-3841.2008.00991.x</pub-id>.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="r15"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Kim</surname>, <given-names>S.-J.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>S. C.</given-names> <surname>Min</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>H.-J.</given-names> <surname>Shin</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>Y.-J.</given-names> <surname>Lee</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>A. R.</given-names> <surname>Cho</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>S. Y.</given-names> <surname>Kim</surname></string-name>, and <string-name><given-names>J.</given-names> <surname>Han</surname></string-name></person-group>. <year>2013</year>. <article-title>Evaluation of the antioxidant activities and nutritional properties of ten edible plant extracts and their application to fresh ground beef</article-title>. <source>Meat Sci</source>. <volume>93</volume>:<fpage>715</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>722</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2012.11.029</pub-id>.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="r16"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Lanari</surname>, <given-names>M. C.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>D. M.</given-names> <surname>Schaefer</surname></string-name>, and <string-name><given-names>K. K.</given-names> <surname>Scheller</surname></string-name></person-group>. <year>1995</year>. <article-title>Dietary vitamin E supplementation and discoloration of pork bone and muscle following modified atmosphere packaging</article-title>. <source>Meat Sci</source>. <volume>41</volume>:<fpage>237</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>250</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1016/0309-1740(95)00006-7</pub-id>.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="r17"><mixed-citation publication-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Lawrie</surname>, <given-names>R. A.</given-names></string-name>, and <string-name><given-names>D. A.</given-names> <surname>Ledward</surname></string-name></person-group>. <year>2006</year>. <source>Lawrie&#x02019;s meat science</source>. <edition>7th ed</edition>. <publisher-name>Woodhead Publishing</publisher-name>, <publisher-loc>Cambridge, UK</publisher-loc>.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="r18"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Mancini</surname>, <given-names>R. A.</given-names></string-name>, and <string-name><given-names>M. C.</given-names> <surname>Hunt</surname></string-name></person-group>. <year>2005</year>. <article-title>Current research in meat color</article-title>. <source>Meat Sci</source>. <volume>71</volume>:<fpage>100</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>121</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2005.03.003</pub-id>.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="r19"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Mancini</surname>, <given-names>R. A.</given-names></string-name>, and <string-name><given-names>R.</given-names> <surname>Ramanathan</surname></string-name></person-group>. <year>2014</year>. <article-title>Effects of postmortem storage time on color and mitochondria in beef</article-title>. <source>Meat Sci</source>. <volume>98</volume>:<fpage>65</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>70</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2014.04.007</pub-id>.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="r20"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Mancini</surname>, <given-names>R. A.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>M. C.</given-names> <surname>Hunt</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>K. A.</given-names> <surname>Hachmeister</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>D. H.</given-names> <surname>Kropf</surname></string-name>, and <string-name><given-names>D. E.</given-names> <surname>Johnson</surname></string-name></person-group>. <year>2004</year>. <article-title>Ascorbic acid minimizes vertebrae discoloration</article-title>. <source>Meat Sci</source>. <volume>68</volume>:<fpage>339</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>345</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2004.03.017</pub-id>.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="r21"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>McKenna</surname>, <given-names>D. R.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>P. D.</given-names> <surname>Mies</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>B. E.</given-names> <surname>Baird</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>K. D.</given-names> <surname>Pfeiffer</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>J. W.</given-names> <surname>Ellebracht</surname></string-name>, and <string-name><given-names>J. W.</given-names> <surname>Savell</surname></string-name></person-group>. <year>2005</year>. <article-title>Biochemical and physical factors affecting discoloration characteristics of 19 bovine muscles</article-title>. <source>Meat Sci</source>. <volume>70</volume>:<fpage>665</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>682</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2005.02.016</pub-id>.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="r22"><mixed-citation publication-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Murray</surname>, <given-names>R. K.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>D. K.</given-names> <surname>Granner</surname></string-name>, and <string-name><given-names>V. W.</given-names> <surname>Rodwell</surname></string-name></person-group>. <year>2006</year>. <source>Harper&#x02019;s illustrated biochemistry</source>. <edition>27th ed</edition>. <publisher-name>McGraw Hill</publisher-name>, <publisher-loc>New York</publisher-loc>.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="r23"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Oswell</surname>, <given-names>N. J.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>H.</given-names> <surname>Thippareddi</surname></string-name>, and <string-name><given-names>R. B.</given-names> <surname>Pegg</surname></string-name></person-group>. <year>2018</year>. <article-title>Practical use of natural antioxidants in meat products in the U.S.: A review</article-title>. <source>Meat Sci</source>. <volume>145</volume>:<fpage>469</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>479</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2018.07.020</pub-id>.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="r24"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Sammel</surname>, <given-names>L. M.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>M. C.</given-names> <surname>Hunt</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>D. H.</given-names> <surname>Kropf</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>K. A.</given-names> <surname>Hachmeister</surname></string-name>, and <string-name><given-names>D. E.</given-names> <surname>Johnson</surname></string-name></person-group>. <year>2002</year>. <article-title>Comparison of assays for metmyoglobin reducing ability in beef inside and outside semimembranosus muscle</article-title>. <source>J. Food Sci</source>. <volume>67</volume>:<fpage>978</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>984</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.2002.tb09439.x</pub-id>.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="r25"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Tarladgis</surname>, <given-names>B. G.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>B. M.</given-names> <surname>Watts</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>M. T.</given-names> <surname>Younathan</surname></string-name>, and <string-name><given-names>L.</given-names> <surname>Dugan</surname>, <suffix>Jr.</suffix></string-name> </person-group><year>1960</year>. <article-title>A distillation method for the quantitative determination of malonaldehyde in rancid foods</article-title>. <source>J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc</source>. <volume>37</volume>:<fpage>44</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>48</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02630824</pub-id>.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="r26"><mixed-citation publication-type="other"><collab>USDA FAS</collab>. <year>2020</year>. South Korea 2019 export highlights. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.fas.usda.gov/south-korea-2019-export-highlights">https://www.fas.usda.gov/south-korea-2019-export-highlights</ext-link>. (Accessed 4 January 2021.)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="r27"><mixed-citation publication-type="other"><collab>USMEF</collab>. <year>2020</year>. U.S. Meat Export Federation annual report 2019. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.usmef.org/downloads/2019-USMEF-Annual-Report.pdf">https://www.usmef.org/downloads/2019-USMEF-Annual-Report.pdf</ext-link>. (Accessed 22 January 2020.)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="r28"><mixed-citation publication-type="other"><collab>USMEF</collab>. <year>2021</year>. U.S. Meat Export Federation annual report 2020. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.usmef.org/downloads/2020-USMEF-Annual-Report.pdf">https://www.usmef.org/downloads/2020-USMEF-Annual-Report.pdf</ext-link>. (Accessed 14 January 2021.)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="r29"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Zhang</surname>, <given-names>X.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>D.</given-names> <surname>Li</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>Q.</given-names> <surname>Meng</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>C.</given-names> <surname>He</surname></string-name>, and <string-name><given-names>L.</given-names> <surname>Ren</surname></string-name></person-group>. <year>2016</year>. <article-title>Effect of mulberry leaf extracts on color, lipid oxidation, antioxidant enzyme activities and oxidative breakdown products of raw ground beef during refrigerated storage</article-title>. <source>J. Food Quality</source>. <volume>39</volume>:<fpage>159</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>170</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1111/jfq.12187</pub-id>.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>