<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD with OASIS Tables with MathML3 v1.2d1 20130915//EN" "JATS-archive-oasis-article1.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" xml:lang="en" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">MMB</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Meat and Muscle Biology</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2575-985X</issn><publisher><publisher-name>American Meat Science Association</publisher-name><publisher-loc/></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.22175/mmb.11704</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id"/><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Original Research Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Correlation of Bioelectrical Impedance With Freshness Quality Attributes of Beef <italic>Longissimus Lumborum</italic> Steaks</article-title><alt-title alt-title-type="right-running">Najar-Villarreal et al.&#x2003;&#x2003;&#x2003;&#x2003;&#x2003;Use of bioelectrical impedance on beef</alt-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Najar-Villarreal</surname><given-names>F.</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name><surname>Boyle</surname><given-names>E. A. E.</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1">*</xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Vahl</surname><given-names>C.</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Kang</surname><given-names>Q.</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Houser</surname><given-names>T. A.</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Gonzalez</surname><given-names>J. M.</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"><sup>4</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Amamcharla</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Vega</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Kastner</surname><given-names>J. J.</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff5"><sup>5</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Cox</surname><given-names>M. K.</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff6"><sup>6</sup></xref></contrib><aff id="aff1"><label><sup>1</sup></label>Department of Animal Sciences and Industry, <institution>Kansas State University</institution>, Manhattan, KS 66506, USA</aff><aff id="aff2"><label><sup>2</sup></label>Department of Statistics, <institution>Kansas State University</institution>, Manhattan, KS 66506, USA</aff><aff id="aff3"><label><sup>3</sup></label>Department of Animal Science, <institution>Iowa State University</institution>, Ames, IA 50011, USA</aff><aff id="aff4"><label><sup>4</sup></label>Department of Animal and Dairy Science, <institution>University of Georgia</institution>, Athens, GA 30602, USA</aff><aff id="aff5"><label><sup>5</sup></label>Department of Diagnostic Medicine/Pathobiology, <institution>Kansas State University</institution>, Manhattan, KS 66506, USA</aff><aff id="aff6"><label><sup>6</sup></label>Seafood Analytics, <institution>Juneau</institution>, AK 99801, USA</aff></contrib-group><author-notes><corresp id="cor1"><label>&#x002A;</label>Corresponding author. Email: <email>lboyle@ksu.edu</email> (E. A. E. Boyle)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date date-type="epub" publication-format="electronic"><day>00</day><month>00</month><year>0000</year></pub-date><volume>5</volume><issue>1</issue><fpage>1</fpage><lpage>11</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>10</day><month>11</month><year>2020</year></date><date date-type="accepted"><day>15</day><month>01</month><year>2021</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-year>2021</copyright-year><copyright-holder>&#x00A9; American Meat Science Association.</copyright-holder><license license-type="open-access" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/"><license-p>This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY license (<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link>)</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><title>Abstract</title><p>The quality attributes of beef <italic>longissimus lumborum</italic> during 15 d of retail display were assessed using surface bioelectrical impedance analysis (S-BIA) and internal bioelectrical impedance analysis (I-BIA). Beef loins (<italic>N</italic>&#x2009;&#x003D;&#x2009;18) were obtained from 3 commercial processors with 3 postmortem (PM) ages (27, 34, and 37 d). Loins were fabricated into twelve 2.54-cm-thick steaks, subdivided into 6 consecutively cut pairs, and randomly assigned to one of 6 display days (DD): 0, 3, 6, 9, 12, or 15. Steaks were assessed for S-BIA and I-BIA. Three locations were analyzed within each steak: top, middle, and bottom. Microbiological analysis, BIA, pH, instrumental color, proximate composition, and lipid oxidation were measured. There was a location&#x2009;&#x00D7;&#x2009;PM day&#x2009;&#x00D7;&#x2009;DD interaction (<italic>P</italic>&#x2009;&#x003C;&#x2009;0.05) for <italic>longissimus lumborum</italic> steaks for S-BIA. Among all 3 locations, steaks aged 27 d had higher (<italic>P</italic>&#x2009;&#x003C;&#x2009;0.05) S-BIA values on day 9 and 12 than steaks aged 34 and 37 d. There were no location&#x2009;&#x00D7;&#x2009;PM day&#x2009;&#x00D7;&#x2009;DD or two-way interactions (<italic>P</italic>&#x2009;&#x003E;&#x2009;0.05) for I-BIA. Display day affected (<italic>P</italic>&#x2009;&#x003C;&#x2009;0.05) all instrumental color data regardless of PM aging times. Among all PM aging times, steaks aged 27 d were 13% and 7% higher for <italic>a&#x002A;</italic> and <italic>b&#x002A;</italic>, respectively, compared with 34 and 37 d PM. There was a PM day&#x2009;&#x00D7;&#x2009;DD interaction (<italic>P</italic>&#x2009;&#x003C;&#x2009;0.05) for aerobic plate counts (APC). From day 0 and 9 of display, APC of steaks aged 27 d PM were 1 to 2.0 log colony-forming units/cm<sup>2</sup> lower than steaks aged 34 and 37 d. Quality attributes, including <italic>a&#x002A;</italic>, <italic>b&#x002A;</italic>, APC, and thiobarbituric acid reactive substances, were correlated (<italic>r</italic>&#x2009;&#x003D;&#x2009;0.70, &#x2212;0.64, &#x2212;0.56, and 0.69, respectively) with S-BIA. Overall, BIA values increased on aerobically packaged <italic>longissimus lumborum</italic> steaks and were correlated with various freshness quality parameters.</p></abstract><kwd-group><title>Key words:</title><kwd>beef</kwd><kwd>bioelectrical impedance</kwd><kwd>shelf-life attributes</kwd><kwd>retail</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="sec1"><title>Introduction</title><p>Food waste is an eminent worldwide issue. It has been estimated that approximately one-third of all edible food&#x2014;or 1.3 billion metric tons&#x2014;from the beginning of agricultural production fails to reach consumer tables (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r18">Gustavsson et&#x00A0;al., 2011</xref>). A study by Buzby et&#x00A0;al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r4">2014</xref>) estimated that 1.2 million metric tons of meat is not being utilized only at the retail level, which is due to food loss and wasted food products across the United States supply chain. In the US, meat is discounted or discarded due to discoloration, which accounts for 15% of meat loss, leading to industry revenue losses of up to $1 billion (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r34">Smith et&#x00A0;al., 2000</xref>). As little as 20% surface discoloration is sufficient for consumers to reject meat (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r12">Djenane et&#x00A0;al., 2001</xref>).</p><p>Measuring spoilage in meat is of utmost importance to determine freshness in the meat industry. Bacteria growth and lipid oxidation are two of the major freshness quality traits that affect meat spoilage and can be objectively assessed. Depending upon the environment in the meat packaging, microorganisms at levels of 10<sup>7</sup> to 10<sup>8</sup> log colony-forming units (CFU)/cm<sup>2</sup> promote the formation of slime and off-odors, leading to spoilage (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r20">Ingram and Simonsen, 1980</xref>). Furthermore, lipid oxidation of meat is normally evaluated using the thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS) assay (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r39">Witte et&#x00A0;al., 1970</xref>). Campo et&#x00A0;al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r7">2006</xref>) determined that a TBARS value of 2.0 mg malondialdehyde (MDA)/kg caused trained panelists to reject product owing to rancid odor. However, these laboratory-based methods are usually destructive, time-consuming, and training dependent.</p><p>The aforementioned drawbacks have set the path for quick and nondestructive methods to assess meat freshness and quality, including the electric nose, near-infrared spectroscopy, hyperspectral imaging technology, torrymeter, and bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) using a certified quality reader (CQR). The CQR is a technology that measures impedance as a means to evaluate the freshness of meat by calculating algorithms that assess cellular condition. Bioelectrical impedance, a nondestructive analysis of meat, was first documented in the medical sciences at the beginning of the 1900s (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r29">Morse, 1925</xref>). Callow (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r6">1936</xref>) was one of the first meat scientists who studied the electrical characteristics of meat. Some researchers have reported impedance as an effective technology to predict salable yields in beef carcasses (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r27">Marchello and Slanger, 1994</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r40">Zollinger et&#x00A0;al., 2010</xref>). In addition, Byrne et&#x00A0;al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r5">2000</xref>) studied how electrical impedance affected vacuum-packaged <italic>longissimus dorsi</italic> muscle during postmortem (PM) aging as well as its relationship to other quality traits. Additionally, in ground beef and pork, BIA was found to be an accurate predictor of fat content, especially at smaller grind sizes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r28">Marchello et&#x00A0;al., 1999</xref>). To the best of our knowledge, little research has been conducted to study the effect of impedance on aerobically packaged <italic>longissimus lumborum</italic> steaks during simulated retail display. Therefore, the effectiveness of BIA to determine the quality attributes of beef and its relationship with meat quality parameters during 15 d of simulated retail display was analyzed.</p></sec><sec id="sec2"><title>Materials and Methods</title><sec id="sec2.1"><title>Sample collection</title><p>Beef strip loins (Top Choice; <italic>N</italic>&#x2009;&#x003D;&#x2009;18; Institutional Meat Purchase Specification #180; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r37">USDA Agricultural Marketing Service, 2014</xref>) were obtained from 3 commercial processors, which had different PM age days&#x2014;27, 34, or 37 d. Loins were cut into 12 steaks of 2.54 cm in thickness and were taken from the anterior to the posterior portion. They were prepared at the Kansas State University (KSU) Meats Laboratory. Steaks were subdivided into 6 consecutively cut pairs and were randomly assigned to one of 6 display days (DD): 0, 3, 6, 9, 12, and 15. Within each pair, one steak was allocated to microbiological analysis and pH measurement. The paired steak was used for BIA, instrumental color assessment, proximate composition, and TBARS. Each steak was placed with the anterior-sliced end facing up on 17S Styrofoam trays (Dyne-a-pak Inc., Laval, QC, Canada) containing Dry-Loc moisture absorbent pads (ac-50; Cryovac, Duncan, SC) and overwrapped with polyvinyl chloride film (23,250 cm<sup>3</sup>/m<sup>2</sup>/24 h at 23&#x00B0;C and 0% relative humidity; Borden Packaging and Industrial Products, North Andover, MA).</p></sec><sec id="sec2.2"><title>Display case</title><p>Following packaging, steaks were moved to the KSU Color Laboratory and displayed in coffin-style retail cases (model DMF 8; Tyler Refrigeration Corporation, Niles, MI) under fluorescent lights (32 W Del-Warm White 3,000&#x00B0; K; Philips Lighting Co., Somerset, NJ) that emitted a constant 24-h case average intensity of 2,230&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;34 lx. Case temperature was monitored using single channel temperature and humidity sensors (model OM-HL-SP-TH; Omega, Norwalk, CT) and averaged 0.26&#x00B0;C&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;0.95&#x00B0;C on steak package surfaces. Cases were defrosted twice daily (morning and evening) at 11&#x00B0;C for 30 min. Steaks were rotated twice a day in the cases from left to right and front to back to account for minor variations in temperature and light intensity within the cases.</p></sec><sec id="sec2.3"><title>Impedance analysis</title><p>The freshness of <italic>longissimus lumborum</italic> steaks was assessed using BIA with a CQR (Seafood Analytics CQR, Model Quantum IV, RJL Systems, Clinton Twp., MI) device. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">Figure&#x00A0;1</xref> depicts the location of the BIA measurements. This technology consists of a 4-electrode device of stainless-steel compression-style electrodes. The outer pair electrodes send a low-frequency electrical current (800 &#x03BC;A, 50 kHz), the voltage capacity of which ranges between 3.75 and 10.60 V. After conductivity is measured, impedance is calculated using the resistance (R) and reactance (X) values that are displayed on the device digital screen. The formula used was impedance in series (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>Z</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msqrt><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mrow><mml:mi>X</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:msqrt></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The electrodes were cleaned after every measurement. Three locations within the steak&#x2014;including top, middle, and bottom, from dorsal to ventral&#x2014;were evaluated. Three readings were retrieved from each location of the electrodes, and an average was calculated for each steak. The BIA readings were obtained on the surface of the steak by moderately compressing the electrodes up to the middle end (halfway). A template was created to be consistent along the surface BIA (S-BIA) readings. Sample temperature was measured and ranged 0&#x00B0;C to 10&#x00B0;C. Similarly, the internal BIA (I-BIA) of the samples was analyzed using needles inserted at 5 mm. A template was created to be consistent along the S-BIA readings.</p><fig id="f1"><label>Figure 1.</label><caption><p>Illustration of anatomical locations of bioelectrical impedance measurements in <italic>longissimus lumborum</italic> steaks.</p></caption><graphic xlink:href="1.png"/></fig></sec><sec id="sec2.4"><title>Color measurements</title><p>Meat color readings for Commission Internationale de l&#x00B4;Eclairage (&#x201C;International Commission on Illumination&#x201D;) <italic>L&#x002A;</italic>, <italic>a&#x002A;</italic>, and <italic>b&#x002A;</italic> and reflectance from 400 to 700 nm were instrumentally assessed every sampling day using a HunterLab MiniScan EZ (Illuminant A, 2.54-cm diameter aperture, 10&#x00B0; observer; Model 4500; Reston, VA) according to the methods of Phelps et&#x00A0;al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r30">2014</xref>). Readings were taken at 3 steak locations on each day of display, and values were used to calculate an average value for each steak. In addition, steak surface percentages of metmyoglobin and oxymyoglobin were calculated using reflectance values at 473, 525, 572, and 700 nm and using the equations of Krzywicki (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r23">1979</xref>), as published in the American Meat Science Association Meat Color Measurement Guidelines (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r2">American Meat Science Association, 2012</xref>). Additionally, <italic>a&#x002A;</italic> and <italic>b&#x002A;</italic> values were used to calculate chroma and hue angle values (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r2">American Meat Science Association, 2012</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="sec2.5"><title>Microbiological analysis and pH</title><p>At each sampling time, steak packages designated for microbial sampling were aseptically opened in the KSU Microbiology Laboratory, and two 21.6-cm<sup>2</sup> cores were removed from the steak surface using a sterile scalpel at a depth of 1.5&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;0.5 mm. Each core was outlined using a sterilized stainless-steel meat coring device. Excised steak samples were placed into sterile plastic bags (Whirl-Pak bags, Nasco, Fort Atkinson, WI) containing 50 mL of sterile 0.1% peptone water (Bacto, Flankin Lakes, NJ). Excised cores were homogenized for 60 s using a stomacher (Model AESAP1064, AES Chemunex, Bruz, France). Serial dilutions of this homogenate were prepared using 9 mL of 0.1% peptone water and plated in duplicate on Petrifilm (3M, St. Paul, MN) to enumerate aerobic plate counts (APC). Samples were incubated and enumerated according to manufacturer instructions. Bacteria populations were calculated, transformed logarithmically, and reported as log CFU/cm<sup>2</sup>. Following microbiological sampling, pH was measured using a calibrated pH probe (Model FC232, Hanna Instruments Inc., Woonsocket, RI) with a pH meter (Model HI 99163, Hanna Instruments Inc.). To determine pH, the probe was inserted in duplicate on the side adjacent to the cores taken for microbial sampling.</p></sec><sec id="sec2.6"><title>Proximate composition</title><p>From the paired steak, an additional 50 g was excised, frozen using liquid nitrogen, and homogenized with a blender (Model 33BL79, Waring Products, New Hartford, CT). The homogeneous powder was placed in 11.4&#x2009;&#x00D7;&#x2009;22.9&#x2013;cm plastic labeled Whirl-Pak bags (Fisher Scientific, Fair Lawn, NJ) and stored at &#x2212;80&#x00B0;C until used for proximate analysis determination and TBARS. The homogeneous powdered samples were analyzed in the KSU Analytical Laboratory for moisture and crude fat content by SMART system 5 (CEM Corporation, Matthews, NC) following AOAC Method (&#x201C;Official Method PVM-1 MEAT&#x201D;; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r3">AOAC, 2003</xref>). Additionally, protein content was analyzed using the LECO FP-2000 Protein/Nitrogen Analyzer (Model 602-600, Leco Corporation, St. Joseph, MI). The combustion method was used, and nitrogen percentage was multiplied by 6.25 to determine the protein content of samples (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r24">Leco Corporation, 2011</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="sec2.7"><title>Thiobarbituric acid reactive substances</title><p>Lipid oxidation during simulated retail display was evaluated using the TBARS assay using procedures as described by Witte et&#x00A0;al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r39">1970</xref>). Briefly, 5 g from the homogenous powder was weighed, blended with 45 mL of ice-cold trichloroacetic acid (11%) solution, and homogenized using a Waring blender for 30 s. One milliliter of filtrate was mixed with 1 mL of 2-thiobarbituric (20 mM) solution. In parallel, a standard curve was created to calculate lipid oxidation using malondialdehyde bis (Millipore Corporation, Billerica, MA). This reaction was carried out in the dark to exclude light. Samples and standards were heated in a 100&#x00B0;C water bath for 10 min and then cooled in room temperature water for 5 min. Following cooling, 0.2 mL of standards and supernatant from each sample were transferred to 96-well plates (in duplicates). Absorbance was read at 532 nm (Eon Microplate Spectrophotometer; BioTek Instruments Inc., Winooski, VT). Values were expressed as milligrams of malonaldehyde per kilogram of muscle.</p></sec><sec id="sec2.8"><title>Statistical analyses</title><p>Statistical analysis was executed using the MIXED procedure in SAS/STAT&#x00D2; software, version 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC). The experimental design was a split-plot. For the whole plot, treatment was PM aging time, and the experimental unit was loin. For the sub-plot, treatment was DD, and the experimental unit was the steak corresponding to loin and DD combination. Impedance measurement was collected at 3 locations of a steak at the surface and internally, leading to the multivariate response.</p><p>Data underwent natural-log transformation. Surface impedance and internal impedance were analyzed separately and then analyzed under the linear mixed model. Fixed effects of the model include PM day, DD, location, and all two-way and three-way interactions. Random effect of the model is loin&#x2009;&#x00D7;&#x2009;PM day. Each of the freshness quality attributes was analyzed, separately, under the linear mixed model with fixed effects of PM day, DD, and PM day&#x2009;&#x00D7;&#x2009;DD. The random effect of the model was loin&#x2009;&#x00D7;&#x2009;PM day. Least-squares mean and its standard errors&#x2014;back-transformed to the original scale when applicable&#x2014;were reported for fixed effects. The adjustment for multiplicity was carried out using Tukey&#x2019;s method at the 0.05 significance level. The CORR procedure of SAS was used to calculate the correlation of S-BIA and I-BIA (on the natural-log scale). Impedance averaged across the 3 locations and DD was used.</p></sec></sec><sec id="sec3"><title>Results</title><sec id="sec3.1"><title>Bioelectrical impedance</title><p>There was a location&#x2009;&#x00D7;&#x2009;PM day&#x2009;&#x00D7;&#x2009;DD interaction (<italic>P</italic>&#x2009;&#x003C;&#x2009;0.05) for <italic>longissimus lumborum</italic> steaks when assessed for S-BIA. Because all locations acted independent of one another, PM day&#x2009;&#x00D7;&#x2009;DD interactions were analyzed by steak location. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">Figure&#x00A0;2</xref> shows the interaction for Top-S-BIA. From day 0 to day 3 of display, Top-S-BIA values were similar (<italic>P</italic>&#x2009;&#x003E;&#x2009;0.05) for all PM aging times. On day 6, steaks aged 27 d were similar to steaks aged 34 d but 26% higher than those aged 37 d. Moreover, steaks aged 34 d and those aged 37 d were similar (<italic>P</italic>&#x2009;&#x003E;&#x2009;0.05). On day 9, steaks aged 27 d were 19% and 24% higher (<italic>P</italic>&#x2009;&#x003C;&#x2009;0.05) than steaks aged 34 and 37 d, respectively. Top-S-BIA values of steaks aged 27 d were higher (<italic>P</italic>&#x2009;&#x003C;&#x2009;0.05) than steaks aged 34 and 37 d on day 12. However, on day 15, steaks aged 27 d and those aged 34 d were similar (<italic>P</italic>&#x2009;&#x003E;&#x2009;0.05) but 18% higher than steaks aged 37 d. The interaction for Middle-S-BIA is presented in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">Figure&#x00A0;3</xref>. From day 0 to day 3 of display, Middle-S-BIA values were similar (<italic>P</italic>&#x2009;&#x003E;&#x2009;0.05) for all PM aging times. On day 6, steaks aged 27 d were similar (<italic>P</italic>&#x2009;&#x003E;&#x2009;0.05) to steaks aged 34 d but 17% higher (<italic>P</italic>&#x2009;&#x003C;&#x2009;0.05) than those aged 37 d. The Middle-S-BIA values of steaks aged 34 and 37 d were similar (<italic>P</italic>&#x2009;&#x003E;&#x2009;0.05) and 24% and 12% lower (<italic>P</italic>&#x2009;&#x003C;&#x2009;0.05) than those of steaks aged for 27 d on days 9 and 12, respectively. On day 15, steaks aged 34 d were similar (<italic>P</italic>&#x2009;&#x003E;&#x2009;0.05) to steaks aged 27 d but 14% higher than steaks aged 37 d. In addition, steaks aged 27 and those aged 37 d were similar (<italic>P</italic>&#x2009;&#x003E;&#x2009;0.05). Interaction for Bottom-S-BIA can be found in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4">Figure&#x00A0;4</xref>. From day 0 to day 6 of display, all PM aging times were similar (<italic>P</italic>&#x2009;&#x003E;&#x2009;0.05). On days 9 and 12, the Bottom-S-BIA values of steaks aged 27 d were 24% and 15% greater (<italic>P</italic>&#x2009;&#x003C;&#x2009;0.05) than steaks aged 34 and 37 d, respectively. Furthermore, on day 15 of retail display, Bottom-S-BIA values of steaks aged 27 and 34 d were similar (<italic>P</italic>&#x2009;&#x003E;&#x2009;0.05) and were 21% higher (<italic>P</italic>&#x2009;&#x003C;&#x2009;0.05) than steaks aged 37 d. Additionally, location, PM day, and DD effects were found (<italic>P</italic>&#x2009;&#x003C;&#x2009;0.05). There was no three-way or two-way interaction (<italic>P</italic>&#x2009;&#x003E;&#x2009;0.05; <xref ref-type="table" rid="tab1">Table&#x00A0;1</xref>) for <italic>longissimus</italic> <italic>lumborum</italic> steaks for I-BIA, but a main effect due to location, PM day, and DD was found (<italic>P</italic>&#x2009;&#x003C;&#x2009;0.05). The middle portion had lower (<italic>P</italic>&#x2009;&#x003C;&#x2009;0.05) I-BIA values than the top and bottom portion. Because of a technical problem with the I-BIA probe, data were removed on day 0 for the middle portion.</p><fig id="f2"><label>Figure 2.</label><caption><p>Interaction for top-bioelectrical impedance values of beef <italic>longissimus lumborum</italic> steaks aged 27, 34, and 37 d and displayed for 15 d under fluorescent lighting at 0.26&#x00B0;C&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;0.95&#x00B0;C. <sup>a,b</sup>Means with different superscripts differ (<italic>P</italic>&#x2009;&#x003C;&#x2009;0.05). <sup>1</sup>Back-transformed LSMEANS.</p></caption><graphic xlink:href="2.png"/></fig><fig id="f3"><label>Figure 3.</label><caption><p>Interaction for middle-bioelectrical impedance values of beef <italic>longissimus lumborum</italic> steaks aged 27, 34, and 37 d and displayed for 15 d under fluorescent lighting at 0.26&#x00B0;C&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;0.95&#x00B0;C. <sup>a,b</sup>Means with different superscripts differ (<italic>P</italic>&#x2009;&#x003C;&#x2009;0.05). <sup>1</sup>Back-transformed LSMEANS.</p></caption><graphic xlink:href="3.png"/></fig><fig id="f4"><label>Figure 4.</label><caption><p>Interaction for bottom-bioelectrical impedance values of beef <italic>longissimus lumborum</italic> steaks aged 27, 34, and 37 d and displayed for 15 d under fluorescent lighting at 0.26&#x00B0;C&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;0.95&#x00B0;C. <sup>a,b</sup>Means with different superscripts differ (<italic>P</italic>&#x2009;&#x003C;&#x2009;0.05). <sup>1</sup>Back-transformed LSMEANS.</p></caption><graphic xlink:href="4.png"/></fig><table-wrap id="tab1"><label>Table 1.</label><caption><p>Internal impedance means<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab1-fn1"><sup>1</sup></xref> of beef <italic>longissimus lumborum</italic> steaks aged 27, 34, and 37 d and displayed for 15 d under fluorescent lighting at 0.26&#x00B0;C&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;0.95&#x00B0;C</p></caption><table><colgroup><col align="left"/><col align="left"/><col align="center"/><col align="center"/><col align="char" char="."/><col align="left"/><col align="char" char="."/><col align="left"/><col align="char" char="."/><col align="left"/><col align="char" char="."/><col align="center"/><col align="char" char="."/><col align="center"/></colgroup><thead><tr><th/><th/><th colspan="12" align="center">Display day</th></tr><tr><th>Location</th><th align="center">PM<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab1-fn2"><sup>2</sup></xref></th><th colspan="2" align="center">0</th><th colspan="2" align="center">3</th><th colspan="2" align="center">6</th><th colspan="2" align="center">9</th><th colspan="2" align="center">12</th><th colspan="2" align="center">15</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td/><td/><td><bold>Mean</bold></td><td><bold>SE</bold></td><td align="center"><bold>Mean</bold></td><td><bold>SE</bold></td><td align="center"><bold>Mean</bold></td><td><bold>SE</bold></td><td align="center"><bold>Mean</bold></td><td><bold>SE</bold></td><td align="center"><bold>Mean</bold></td><td><bold>SE</bold></td><td align="center"><bold>Mean</bold></td><td><bold>SE</bold></td></tr><tr><td rowspan="2"><bold>Top</bold></td><td><bold>27 d</bold></td><td>88.0</td><td>4.0</td><td>105.3</td><td>4.8</td><td>130.3</td><td>5.9</td><td>128.5</td><td>5.8</td><td>120.0</td><td>5.4</td><td>122.0</td><td>5.5</td></tr><tr><td><bold>34 d</bold></td><td>81.0</td><td>3.7</td><td>91.5</td><td>4.1</td><td>112.3</td><td>5.1</td><td>108.4</td><td>4.9</td><td>113.5</td><td>5.1</td><td>124.4</td><td>5.6</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="4"><bold>Middle</bold></td><td><bold>37 d</bold></td><td>74.3</td><td>3.4</td><td>85.3</td><td>3.9</td><td>102.6</td><td>4.8</td><td>103.2</td><td>4.7</td><td>101.7</td><td>4.6</td><td>106.3</td><td>4.8</td></tr><tr><td><bold>27 d</bold></td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>91.0</td><td>4.5</td><td>103.6</td><td>5.2</td><td>111.4</td><td>5.5</td><td>107.3</td><td>5.3</td><td>104.8</td><td>5.2</td></tr><tr><td><bold>34 d</bold></td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>79.9</td><td>4.0</td><td>95.4</td><td>4.8</td><td>91.1</td><td>4.5</td><td>95.0</td><td>4.7</td><td>114.9</td><td>5.7</td></tr><tr><td><bold>37 d</bold></td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>74.6</td><td>3.7</td><td>88.6</td><td>4.5</td><td>88.0</td><td>4.5</td><td>93.2</td><td>4.7</td><td>90.2</td><td>4.6</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="3"><bold>Bottom</bold></td><td><bold>27 d</bold></td><td>87.1</td><td>4.5</td><td>101.8</td><td>5.3</td><td>114.6</td><td>5.9</td><td>124.9</td><td>6.5</td><td>126.3</td><td>6.5</td><td>128.7</td><td>6.7</td></tr><tr><td><bold>34 d</bold></td><td>82.1</td><td>4.3</td><td>89.3</td><td>4.6</td><td>109.1</td><td>5.7</td><td>103.1</td><td>5.3</td><td>109.4</td><td>5.7</td><td>122.3</td><td>6.3</td></tr><tr><td><bold>37 d</bold></td><td>74.1</td><td>3.8</td><td>82.1</td><td>4.3</td><td>97.0</td><td>5.0</td><td>97.0</td><td>5.0</td><td>104.7</td><td>5.4</td><td>99.6</td><td>5.2</td></tr></tbody></table><table-wrap-foot><fn id="tab1-fn1"><label><sup>1</sup></label><p>Back-transformed LSMEANS.</p></fn><fn id="tab1-fn2"><label><sup>2</sup></label><p>Postmortem (PM) aging time.</p></fn><fn id="tab1-fn3"><p>Location&#x2009;&#x00D7;&#x2009;PM&#x2009;&#x00D7;&#x2009;display day (DD) interaction (<italic>P</italic>&#x2009;&#x003E;&#x2009;0.05). Location&#x2009;&#x00D7;&#x2009;PM interaction (<italic>P</italic>&#x2009;&#x003E;&#x2009;0.05). Location&#x2009;&#x00D7;&#x2009;DD interaction (<italic>P</italic>&#x2009;&#x003E;&#x2009;0.05). Location main effect (<italic>P</italic>&#x2009;&#x003C;&#x2009;0.05). PM aging time main effect (<italic>P</italic>&#x2009;&#x003C;&#x2009;0.05). DD main effect (<italic>P</italic>&#x2009;&#x003C;&#x2009;0.05).</p></fn></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap></sec><sec id="sec3.2"><title>Instrumental color assessment</title><p>There were no PM day&#x2009;&#x00D7;&#x2009;DD interactions (<italic>P</italic>&#x2009;&#x003E;&#x2009;0.05) for <italic>a&#x002A;</italic> and <italic>b&#x002A;</italic> values; however, there was an interaction (<italic>P</italic>&#x2009;&#x003C;&#x2009;0.05; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f5">Figure&#x00A0;5</xref>) for <italic>L&#x002A;</italic> values. On day 0, steaks aged 34 d and those aged 37 d were similar (<italic>P</italic>&#x2009;&#x003E;&#x2009;0.05); however, these 2 PM aging times were 6% darker (<italic>P</italic>&#x2009;&#x003C;&#x2009;0.05) compared with steaks aged 27 d. On day 3 of display, <italic>L&#x002A;</italic> scores from all PM aging times were not different (<italic>P</italic>&#x2009;&#x003E;&#x2009;0.05). On day 6, steaks aged 27 d and those aged 34 d were similar (<italic>P</italic>&#x2009;&#x003E;&#x2009;0.05) but 6% lighter (<italic>P</italic>&#x2009;&#x003C;&#x2009;0.05) than those steaks of loins aged 37 d. From day 9 through day 15 of display, <italic>L&#x002A;</italic> scores did not differ (<italic>P</italic>&#x2009;&#x003E;&#x2009;0.05) among all PM aging treatments. PM aging time had no effect (<italic>P</italic>&#x2009;&#x003E;&#x2009;0.05) on <italic>L&#x002A;</italic>. As expected, DD affected (<italic>P</italic>&#x2009;&#x003C;&#x2009;0.05; <xref ref-type="table" rid="tab2">Table&#x00A0;2</xref>) redness and blueness. Furthermore, compared with steaks aged 34 and 37 d PM, steaks aged 27 d were more red (greater <italic>a&#x002A;</italic> values; <italic>P</italic>&#x2009;&#x003C;&#x2009;0.05; <xref ref-type="table" rid="tab3">Table&#x00A0;3</xref>) and yellow (greater <italic>b&#x002A;</italic> values; <italic>P</italic>&#x2009;&#x003C;&#x2009;0.05) by 10% and 5% (<italic>P</italic>&#x2009;&#x003C;&#x2009;0.05), respectively. No interactions were observed for surface metmyoglobin, deoxymyoglobin, or oxymyoglobin (<italic>P</italic>&#x2009;&#x003E;&#x2009;0.05). DD affected (<italic>P</italic>&#x2009;&#x003C;&#x2009;0.05; <xref ref-type="table" rid="tab4">Table&#x00A0;4</xref>) metmyoglobin, deoxymyoglobin, and oxymyoglobin accumulation. By day 0 and through 6 d of display, the surface metmyoglobin increased (<italic>P</italic>&#x2009;&#x003C;&#x2009;0.05); however, after day 9, the surface metmyoglobin remained constant (<italic>P</italic>&#x2009;&#x003E;&#x2009;0.05). Additionally, no PM day effect (<italic>P</italic>&#x2009;&#x003E; 0.05; <xref ref-type="table" rid="tab5">Table&#x00A0;5</xref>) was found on all surface measurements. No PM day&#x2009;&#x00D7;&#x2009;DD interactions (<italic>P</italic>&#x2009;&#x003E;&#x2009;0.05) were found for hue angle and chroma values. Hue angle values increased (<italic>P</italic>&#x2009;&#x003C;&#x2009;0.05) over the 15-d retail display, indicating a less red over time. A decrease (<italic>P</italic>&#x2009;&#x003C;&#x2009;0.05) in chroma values was observed, following a similar pattern as redness values. There were no differences (<italic>P</italic>&#x2009;&#x003E; 0.05) in hue angle values among all PM aging times. Chroma was 7% greater (<italic>P</italic>&#x2009;&#x003C;&#x2009;0.05) in steaks aged 27 d PM than steaks aged 34 and 37 d PM, indicating a more intense red in steaks with less PM.</p><fig id="f5"><label>Figure 5.</label><caption><p>Interaction for lightness scores of beef <italic>longissimus lumborum</italic> steaks aged 27, 34, and 37 d and displayed for 15 d under fluorescent lighting at 0.26&#x00B0;C&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;0.95&#x00B0;C. <sup>a,b</sup>Means with different superscripts differ (<italic>P</italic>&#x2009;&#x003C;&#x2009;0.05).</p></caption><graphic xlink:href="5.png"/></fig><table-wrap id="tab2"><label>Table 2.</label><caption><p>Least-squares means for the display day effect for redness and yellowness of beef <italic>longissimus lumborum</italic> steaks aged three different time periods and displayed for 15 d under fluorescent lighting at 0.26&#x00B0;C&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;0.95&#x00B0;C</p></caption><table><colgroup><col align="left"/><col align="left"/><col align="left"/><col align="left"/><col align="left"/><col align="left"/><col align="left"/><col align="left"/><col align="left"/></colgroup><thead><tr><th align="center" colspan="9">Display day</th></tr><tr><th/><th align="center">0</th><th align="center">3</th><th align="center">6</th><th align="center">9</th><th align="center">12</th><th align="center">15</th><th align="center">SEM</th><th align="center"><italic>P</italic> value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><italic><bold>a&#x002A;</bold></italic></td><td>33.05<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab2-fn1"><sup>a</sup></xref></td><td>29.08<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab2-fn1"><sup>b</sup></xref></td><td>21.33<sup>c</sup></td><td>13.24<sup>d</sup></td><td>11.50<sup>de</sup></td><td>10.91<sup>f</sup></td><td>1.01</td><td>&#x003C; 0.01</td></tr><tr><td><italic><bold>b&#x002A;</bold></italic></td><td>25.80<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab2-fn1"><sup>a</sup></xref></td><td>23.54<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab2-fn1"><sup>b</sup></xref></td><td>20.09<sup>c</sup></td><td>18.04<sup>d</sup></td><td>17.33<sup>d</sup></td><td>16.98<sup>d</sup></td><td>0.64</td><td>&#x003C; 0.01</td></tr></tbody></table><table-wrap-foot><fn id="tab2-fn1"><label><sup>a-f</sup></label><p>Means with different superscripts within a row differ (<italic>P</italic>&#x2009;&#x003C;&#x2009;0.05).</p></fn></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap><table-wrap id="tab3"><label>Table 3.</label><caption><p>Least-squares means for the postmortem age effect for redness and yellowness of beef <italic>longissimus lumborum</italic> aged three different time periods and displayed for 15 d under fluorescent lighting at 0.26&#x00B0;C&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;0.95&#x00B0;C</p></caption><table><colgroup><col align="left"/><col align="left"/><col align="left"/><col align="left"/><col align="left"/><col align="char" char="."/></colgroup><thead><tr><th align="center" colspan="6">Postmortem age</th></tr><tr><th/><th align="center">27 d</th><th align="center">34 d</th><th align="center">37 d</th><th align="center">SEM</th><th align="center"><italic>P</italic> value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><italic><bold>a&#x002A;</bold></italic></td><td>21.45<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab3-fn1"><sup>a</sup></xref></td><td>19.23<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab3-fn1"><sup>b</sup></xref></td><td>18.88<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab3-fn1"><sup>b</sup></xref></td><td>0.77</td><td>&#x003C; 0.01</td></tr><tr><td><italic><bold>b&#x002A;</bold></italic></td><td>21.10<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab3-fn1"><sup>a</sup></xref></td><td>20.12<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab3-fn1"><sup>b</sup></xref></td><td>19.66<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab3-fn1"><sup>b</sup></xref></td><td>0.46</td><td>0.02</td></tr></tbody></table><table-wrap-foot><fn id="tab3-fn1"><label><sup>a,b</sup></label><p>Means with different superscripts within a row differ (<italic>P</italic>&#x2009;&#x003C;&#x2009;0.05).</p></fn></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap><table-wrap id="tab4"><label>Table 4.</label><caption><p>Least-squares means for the display day effect for surface discoloration of beef <italic>longissimus lumborum</italic> steaks aged three different time periods and displayed for 15 d under fluorescent lighting at 0.26&#x00B0;C&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;0.95&#x00B0;C</p></caption><table><colgroup><col align="left"/><col align="char" char="."/><col align="char" char="."/><col align="char" char="."/><col align="char" char="."/><col align="char" char="."/><col align="char" char="."/><col align="char" char="."/><col align="char" char="."/></colgroup><thead><tr><th align="center" colspan="9">Display day</th></tr><tr><th/><th align="center">0</th><th align="center">3</th><th align="center">6</th><th align="center">9</th><th align="center">12</th><th align="center">15</th><th align="center">SEM</th><th align="center"><italic>P</italic> value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><bold>Metmyoglobin</bold></td><td>18.64<sup>d</sup></td><td>25.44<sup>c</sup></td><td>39.60<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab4-fn1"><sup>b</sup></xref></td><td>60.02<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab4-fn1"><sup>a</sup></xref></td><td>60.17<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab4-fn1"><sup>a</sup></xref></td><td>58.84<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab4-fn1"><sup>a</sup></xref></td><td>2.35</td><td>&#x003C; 0.01</td></tr><tr><td><bold>Deoxymyoglobin</bold></td><td>3.00<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab4-fn1"><sup>ab</sup></xref></td><td>5.85<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab4-fn1"><sup>a</sup></xref></td><td>6.35<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab4-fn1"><sup>a</sup></xref></td><td>5.29<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab4-fn1"><sup>a</sup></xref></td><td>3.62<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab4-fn1"><sup>ab</sup></xref></td><td>0.76<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab4-fn1"><sup>b</sup></xref></td><td>2.17</td><td>0.11</td></tr><tr><td><bold>Oxymyoglobin</bold></td><td>78.35<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab4-fn1"><sup>a</sup></xref></td><td>68.71<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab4-fn1"><sup>b</sup></xref></td><td>54.15<sup>c</sup></td><td>34.68<sup>e</sup></td><td>36.20<sup>de</sup></td><td>40.38<sup>d</sup></td><td>3.37</td><td>&#x003C; 0.01</td></tr></tbody></table><table-wrap-foot><fn id="tab4-fn1"><label><sup>a,b</sup></label><p>Means with different superscripts within a row differ (<italic>P</italic>&#x2009;&#x003C;&#x2009;0.05).</p></fn></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap><table-wrap id="tab5"><label>Table 5.</label><caption><p>Least-squares means for the postmortem age effect for surface discoloration of beef <italic>longissimus lumborum</italic> steaks displayed for 15 d under fluorescent lighting at 0.26&#x00B0;C&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;0.95&#x00B0;C</p></caption><table><colgroup><col align="left"/><col align="char" char="."/><col align="char" char="."/><col align="char" char="."/><col align="char" char="."/><col align="char" char="."/></colgroup><thead><tr><th/><th colspan="3" align="center">Postmortem age</th><th/><th/></tr><tr><th/><th>27 d</th><th>34 d</th><th>37 d</th><th>SEM</th><th><italic>P</italic> value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><bold>Metmyoglobin</bold></td><td>41.89</td><td>45.31</td><td>44.15</td><td>2.68</td><td>0.45</td></tr><tr><td><bold>Deoxymyoglobin</bold></td><td>4.51</td><td>3.04</td><td>4.89</td><td>2.86</td><td>0.79</td></tr><tr><td><bold>Oxymyoglobin</bold></td><td>53.59</td><td>51.64</td><td>51.00</td><td>1.80</td><td>0.32</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></sec><sec id="sec3.3"><title>Aerobic plate counts</title><p>There was a PM day&#x2009;&#x00D7;&#x2009;DD interaction (<italic>P</italic>&#x2009;&#x003C;&#x2009;0.05; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f6">Figure&#x00A0;6</xref>) for APC populations. Initially, steaks aged 27 d had the lowest (<italic>P</italic>&#x2009;&#x003C;&#x2009;0.05) APC populations with 2.3 log CFU/cm<sup>2</sup> in comparison to steaks aged 34 and 37 d, which had a similar (<italic>P</italic>&#x2009;&#x003E;&#x2009;0.05) APC growth with 4.3 and 4.5 log CFU/cm<sup>2</sup>, respectively. Aerobic plate counts from steaks aged 27 d remained lower (<italic>P</italic>&#x2009;&#x003C;&#x2009;0.05) compared with those from the 2 other steak age groups until 12 and 15 DD, when they were no longer different and were &#x003E;6 log CFU/cm<sup>2</sup>. Furthermore, steaks aged 37 d had a higher (<italic>P</italic>&#x2009;&#x003C;&#x2009;0.05) prevalence of APC populations than steaks aged 34 d only on day 3 and day 6. Additionally, a PM day and DD effect (<italic>P</italic>&#x2009;&#x003C; 0.05) were found for APC populations.</p><fig id="f6"><label>Figure 6.</label><caption><p>Interaction for APC populations of beef <italic>longissimus lumborum</italic> steaks aged 27, 34, and 37 d and displayed for 15 d under fluorescent lighting at 0.26&#x00B0;C&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;0.95&#x00B0;C. <sup>a&#x2013;c</sup>Means with different superscripts differ (<italic>P</italic>&#x2009;&#x003C;&#x2009;0.05). APC&#x2009;&#x003D;&#x2009;aerobic plate counts; CFU&#x2009;&#x003D;&#x2009;colony-forming units; DD&#x2009;&#x003D;&#x2009;display days; PM&#x2009;&#x003D;&#x2009;postmortem age.</p></caption><graphic xlink:href="6.png"/></fig></sec><sec id="sec3.4"><title>TBARS</title><p>No PM day&#x2009;&#x00D7;&#x2009;DD interaction or PM effect (<italic>P</italic>&#x2009;&#x003E;&#x2009;0.05) was found for TBARS; however, there was a DD effect (<italic>P</italic>&#x2009;&#x003C;&#x2009;0.05; <xref ref-type="table" rid="tab4">Table&#x00A0;4</xref>). From day 0 to day 3, TBARS values were similar (<italic>P</italic>&#x2009;&#x003E;&#x2009;0.05) with 0.14 and 0.19 mg MDA/kg; however, lipid oxidation increased to 0.38 mg MDA/kg on day 6. By day 9 and 12, TBARS values remained constant (<italic>P</italic>&#x2009;&#x003E;&#x2009;0.05). On day 15 of display, lipid oxidation was the highest (<italic>P</italic>&#x2009;&#x003C;&#x2009;0.05) among all DD with 0.79 mg MDA/kg.</p></sec><sec id="sec3.5"><title>Proximate composition and pH</title><p>There was no PM day&#x2009;&#x00D7;&#x2009;DD interaction (<italic>P</italic>&#x2009;&#x003E;&#x2009;0.05) or PM day effect (<italic>P</italic>&#x2009;&#x003E;&#x2009;0.05) for protein, fat, and moisture content. A DD effect (<italic>P</italic>&#x2009;&#x003C;&#x2009;0.05; <xref ref-type="table" rid="tab6">Table&#x00A0;6</xref>) was found for protein and moisture content. Although significant, the variation during retail display was around 1%. Steaks&#x2019; protein content was similar (<italic>P</italic>&#x2009;&#x003E;&#x2009;0.05) at all DD, except from day 6 to day 9, when protein content decreased (<italic>P</italic>&#x2009;&#x003C;&#x2009;0.05) by 2%. However, it was observed that DD affected protein and moisture content (<italic>P</italic>&#x2009;&#x003C;&#x2009;0.05). In addition, no PM time effect (<italic>P</italic>&#x2009;&#x003E;&#x2009;0.05; <xref ref-type="table" rid="tab7">Table&#x00A0;7</xref>) was found on protein, moisture, and fat content. A PM day&#x2009;&#x00D7;&#x2009;DD interaction was observed (<italic>P</italic>&#x2009;&#x003C;&#x2009;0.05; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f7">Figure&#x00A0;7</xref>) for pH. On day 0, 6, 9, 12, and 15 of display, pH was similar (<italic>P</italic>&#x2009;&#x003E;&#x2009;0.05) among all PM aging times. On day 3, however, steaks aged 34 d had a higher (<italic>P</italic>&#x2009;&#x003C;&#x2009;0.05) pH than steaks aged 37 d but were similar (<italic>P</italic>&#x2009;&#x003E;&#x2009;0.05) to steaks of loins aged 27 d. Overall, the pH variation was limited and ranged from 5.48 to 5.65.</p><table-wrap id="tab6"><label>Table 6.</label><caption><p>Least-squares means for the display day effect for proximate composition of beef <italic>longissimus lumborum</italic> steaks aged three different time periods and displayed for 15 d under fluorescent lighting at 0.26&#x00B0;C&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;0.95&#x00B0;C</p></caption><table><colgroup><col align="left"/><col align="char" char="."/><col align="char" char="."/><col align="char" char="."/><col align="char" char="."/><col align="char" char="."/><col align="char" char="."/><col align="char" char="."/><col align="char" char="."/></colgroup><thead><tr><th align="center" colspan="9">Display day</th></tr><tr><th/><th align="center">0</th><th align="center"> 3</th><th align="center">6</th><th align="center">9</th><th align="center">12</th><th align="center">15</th><th align="center">SEM</th><th align="center"><italic>P</italic> value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><bold>Protein</bold></td><td>22.96<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab6-fn1"><sup>a</sup></xref></td><td>22.74<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab6-fn1"><sup>ab</sup></xref></td><td>22.73<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab6-fn1"><sup>ab</sup></xref></td><td>22.35<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab6-fn1"><sup>b</sup></xref></td><td>22.69<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab6-fn1"><sup>ab</sup></xref></td><td>23.02<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab6-fn1"><sup>a</sup></xref></td><td>0.20</td><td>0.03</td></tr><tr><td><bold>Fat</bold></td><td>5.02</td><td>4.41</td><td>5.34</td><td>5.48</td><td>5.35</td><td>5.60</td><td>0.49</td><td>0.19</td></tr><tr><td><bold>Moisture</bold></td><td>70.57<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab6-fn1"><sup>b</sup></xref></td><td>71.52<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab6-fn1"><sup>a</sup></xref></td><td>70.60<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab6-fn1"><sup>b</sup></xref></td><td>70.40<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab6-fn1"><sup>b</sup></xref></td><td>70.43<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab6-fn1"><sup>b</sup></xref></td><td>69.69<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab6-fn1"><sup>b</sup></xref></td><td>0.45</td><td>&#x003C; 0.01</td></tr><tr><td><xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab6-fn2"><sup>1</sup></xref><bold>TBARS</bold></td><td>0.14<sup>d</sup></td><td>0.19<sup>d</sup></td><td>0.38<sup>c</sup></td><td>0.65<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab6-fn1"><sup>b</sup></xref></td><td>0.60<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab6-fn1"><sup>b</sup></xref></td><td>0.79<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab6-fn1"><sup>a</sup></xref></td><td>0.049</td><td>&#x003C; 0.01</td></tr></tbody></table><table-wrap-foot><fn id="tab6-fn1"><label><sup>a,b</sup></label><p>Means with different superscripts within a row differ (<italic>P</italic>&#x2009;&#x003C;&#x2009;0.05).</p></fn><fn id="tab6-fn2"><label><sup>1</sup></label><p>TBARS&#x2009;&#x003D;&#x2009;thiobarbituric acid reactive substances.</p></fn></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap><table-wrap id="tab7"><label>Table 7.</label><caption><p>Least-squares means for the postmortem age effect for proximate composition of beef <italic>longissimus lumborum</italic> steaks displayed for 15 d under fluorescent lighting at 0.26&#x00B0;C&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;0.95&#x00B0;C</p></caption><table><colgroup><col align="left"/><col align="char" char="."/><col align="char" char="."/><col align="char" char="."/><col align="char" char="."/><col align="char" char="."/></colgroup><thead><tr><th/><th colspan="3" align="center">Postmortem age</th><th/><th/></tr><tr><th/><th>27 d</th><th>34 d</th><th>37 d</th><th>SEM</th><th><italic>P</italic> value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><bold>Protein</bold></td><td>22.87</td><td>22.59</td><td>22.77</td><td>0.25</td><td>0.55</td></tr><tr><td><bold>Fat</bold></td><td>5.44</td><td>5.60</td><td>4.56</td><td>0.57</td><td>0.17</td></tr><tr><td><bold>Moisture</bold></td><td>70.10</td><td>70.23</td><td>71.27</td><td>0.56</td><td>0.11</td></tr><tr><td><xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab7-fn1"><sup>1</sup></xref><bold>TBARS</bold></td><td>0.42</td><td>0.50</td><td>0.46</td><td>0.06</td><td>0.40</td></tr></tbody></table><table-wrap-foot><fn id="tab7-fn1"><label><sup>1</sup></label><p>TBARS&#x2009;&#x003D;&#x2009;thiobarbituric acid reactive substances.</p></fn></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap><fig id="f7"><label>Figure 7.</label><caption><p>Interaction for pH values of beef <italic>longissimus lumborum</italic> steaks aged 27, 34, and 37 d and displayed for 15 d under fluorescent lighting at 0.26&#x00B0;C&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;0.95&#x00B0;C. <sup>a,b</sup>Means with different superscripts differ (<italic>P</italic>&#x2009;&#x003C;&#x2009;0.05). DD&#x2009;&#x003D;&#x2009;display days; PM&#x2009;&#x003D;&#x2009;postmortem age.</p></caption><graphic xlink:href="7.png"/></fig></sec><sec id="sec3.6"><title>Correlations</title><p>Moderate negative correlations (<italic>P</italic>&#x2009;&#x003C;&#x2009;0.01; <italic>r</italic>&#x2009;&#x003D;&#x2009;&#x2212;0.56; <xref ref-type="table" rid="tab8">Table&#x00A0;8</xref>) occurred between S-BIA values and instrumental color measurements, including <italic>a&#x002A;</italic> and <italic>b&#x002A;</italic>. No correlations (<italic>P</italic>&#x2009;&#x003E;&#x2009;0.05) were found for <italic>L&#x002A;</italic> values for steaks aged 34 d. Although no correlation (<italic>P</italic>&#x2009;&#x003E;&#x2009;0.05) was found between S-BIA and moisture content for steaks aged 27 and 37 d, steaks aged 34 d were negatively correlated (<italic>P</italic>&#x2009;&#x003C;&#x2009;0.01; <italic>r</italic>&#x2009;&#x003D;&#x2009;&#x2212;0.67). No correlation (<italic>P</italic>&#x2009;&#x003E;&#x2009;0.05) between S-BIA values and fat content was found for steaks aged 27 and 37 d. Aerobic plate counts and TBARS (<italic>P</italic>&#x2009;&#x003C;&#x2009;0.01; <italic>r</italic>&#x2009;&#x003D;&#x2009;0.70) were correlated with S-BIA values for all PM aging times. I-BIA was correlated (<italic>P</italic>&#x2009;&#x003C;&#x2009;0.05; <xref ref-type="table" rid="tab9">Table&#x00A0;9</xref>) with all the parameters tested except for color lightness (<italic>L&#x002A;</italic>) and protein content for PM aging of 27 and 37 d.</p><table-wrap id="tab8"><label>Table 8.</label><caption><p>Correlation coefficients between beef <italic>longissimus lumborum</italic> steak electrical measurements collected using S-BIA and redness, APC, TBARS, and moisture content</p></caption><table><colgroup><col align="center"/><col align="char" char="."/><col align="left"/><col align="left"/><col align="left"/><col align="char" char="."/><col align="char" char="."/><col align="char" char="."/><col align="char" char="."/><col align="char" char="."/></colgroup><thead><tr><th>PM</th><th align="center"><italic>L</italic><xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab8-fn1"><sup>&#x002A;</sup></xref></th><th align="center"><italic>a</italic><xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab8-fn1"><sup>&#x002A;</sup></xref></th><th align="center"><italic>b</italic><xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab8-fn1"><sup>&#x002A;</sup></xref></th><th align="center">Protein</th><th align="center">Moisture</th><th align="center">Fat</th><th align="center">APC</th><th align="center">pH</th><th align="center">TBARS</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><bold>27 d</bold></td><td>&#x2212;0.56<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab8-fn2"><sup>&#x002A;&#x002A;</sup></xref></td><td>&#x2212;0.66<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab8-fn3"><sup>&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;</sup></xref></td><td>&#x2212;0.56<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab8-fn3"><sup>&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;</sup></xref></td><td>&#x2212;0.12</td><td>&#x2212;0.22</td><td>0.03</td><td>0.70<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab8-fn3"><sup>&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;</sup></xref></td><td>&#x2212;0.23</td><td>0.82<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab8-fn3"><sup>&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;</sup></xref></td></tr><tr><td><bold>34 d</bold></td><td>&#x2212;0.15</td><td>&#x2212;0.64<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab8-fn3"><sup>&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;</sup></xref></td><td>&#x2212;0.69<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab8-fn3"><sup>&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;</sup></xref></td><td>&#x2212;0.06</td><td>&#x2212;0.67<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab8-fn3"><sup>&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;</sup></xref></td><td>0.45<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab8-fn3"><sup>&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;</sup></xref></td><td>0.72<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab8-fn3"><sup>&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;</sup></xref></td><td>&#x2212;0.30<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab8-fn1"><sup>&#x002A;</sup></xref></td><td>0.69<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab8-fn3"><sup>&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;</sup></xref></td></tr><tr><td><bold>37 d</bold></td><td>&#x2212;0.43<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab8-fn2"><sup>&#x002A;&#x002A;</sup></xref></td><td>&#x2212;0.70<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab8-fn3"><sup>&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;</sup></xref></td><td>&#x2212;0.65<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab8-fn3"><sup>&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;</sup></xref></td><td>&#x2212;0.13</td><td>0.20</td><td>0.27<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab8-fn1"><sup>&#x002A;</sup></xref></td><td>0.72<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab8-fn3"><sup>&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;</sup></xref></td><td>0.18</td><td>0.72<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab8-fn3"><sup>&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;</sup></xref></td></tr></tbody></table><table-wrap-foot><fn id="tab8-fn1"><label><sup>&#x002A;</sup></label><p><italic>P</italic>&#x2009;&#x003C;&#x2009;0.05.</p></fn><fn id="tab8-fn2"><label><sup>&#x002A;&#x002A;</sup></label><p><italic>P</italic>&#x2009;&#x003C;&#x2009;0.01.</p></fn><fn id="tab8-fn3"><label><sup>&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;</sup></label><p><italic>P</italic>&#x2009;&#x003C;&#x2009;0.001.</p></fn><fn id="tab8-fn4"><p>APC&#x2009;&#x003D;&#x2009;aerobic plate count; PM&#x2009;&#x003D;&#x2009;postmortem age; S-BIA&#x2009;&#x003D;&#x2009;surface bioelectrical impedance analysis; TBARS&#x2009;&#x003D;&#x2009;thiobarbituric acid reactive substances.</p></fn></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap><table-wrap id="tab9"><label>Table 9.</label><caption><p>Correlation coefficients between beef <italic>longissimus lumborum</italic> steak electrical measurements collected using I-BIA and redness, APC, TBARS, and moisture content</p></caption><table><colgroup><col align="left"/><col align="char" char="."/><col align="left"/><col align="left"/><col align="char" char="."/><col align="left"/><col align="char" char="."/><col align="left"/><col align="char" char="."/><col align="left"/></colgroup><thead><tr><th>PM</th><th align="center"><italic>L</italic><xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab9-fn1"><sup>&#x002A;</sup></xref></th><th align="center"><italic>a</italic><xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab9-fn1"><sup>&#x002A;</sup></xref></th><th align="center"><italic>b</italic><xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab9-fn1"><sup>&#x002A;</sup></xref></th><th align="center">Protein</th><th align="center">Moisture</th><th align="center">Fat</th><th align="center">APC</th><th align="center">pH</th><th>TBARS</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><bold>27 d</bold></td><td>&#x2212;0.10</td><td>&#x2212;0.56<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab9-fn3"><sup>&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;</sup></xref></td><td>&#x2212;0.44<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab9-fn2"><sup>&#x002A;&#x002A;</sup></xref></td><td>&#x2212;0.02</td><td>&#x2212;0.68<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab9-fn3"><sup>&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;</sup></xref></td><td>0.57<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab9-fn3"><sup>&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;</sup></xref></td><td>0.58<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab9-fn3"><sup>&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;</sup></xref></td><td>&#x2212;0.29<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab9-fn1"><sup>&#x002A;</sup></xref></td><td>0.63<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab9-fn3"><sup>&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;</sup></xref></td></tr><tr><td><bold>34 d</bold></td><td>0.06</td><td>&#x2212;0.64<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab9-fn3"><sup>&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;</sup></xref></td><td>&#x2212;0.69<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab9-fn3"><sup>&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;</sup></xref></td><td>&#x2212;0.29<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab9-fn1"><sup>&#x002A;</sup></xref></td><td>&#x2212;0.73<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab9-fn3"><sup>&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;</sup></xref></td><td>0.58<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab9-fn3"><sup>&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;</sup></xref></td><td>0.85<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab9-fn3"><sup>&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;</sup></xref></td><td>&#x2212;0.24<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab9-fn1"><sup>&#x002A;</sup></xref></td><td>0.67<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab9-fn3"><sup>&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;</sup></xref></td></tr><tr><td><bold>37 d</bold></td><td>&#x2212;0.25</td><td>&#x2212;0.71<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab9-fn3"><sup>&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;</sup></xref></td><td>&#x2212;0.69<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab9-fn3"><sup>&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;</sup></xref></td><td>0.16</td><td>&#x2212;0.63<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab9-fn3"><sup>&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;</sup></xref></td><td>0.40<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab9-fn2"><sup>&#x002A;&#x002A;</sup></xref></td><td>0.87<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab9-fn3"><sup>&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;</sup></xref></td><td>0.45<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab9-fn2"><sup>&#x002A;&#x002A;</sup></xref></td><td>0.62<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tab9-fn3"><sup>&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;</sup></xref></td></tr></tbody></table><table-wrap-foot><fn id="tab9-fn1"><label><sup>&#x002A;</sup></label><p><italic>P</italic>&#x2009;&#x003C;&#x2009;0.05.</p></fn><fn id="tab9-fn2"><label><sup>&#x002A;&#x002A;</sup></label><p><italic>P</italic>&#x2009;&#x003C;&#x2009;0.01.</p></fn><fn id="tab9-fn3"><label><sup>&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;</sup></label><p><italic>P</italic>&#x2009;&#x003C;&#x2009;0.001.</p></fn><fn id="tab9-fn4"><p>APC&#x2009;&#x003D;&#x2009;aerobic plate count; I-BIA&#x2009;&#x003D;&#x2009;internal bioelectrical impedance analysis; PM&#x2009;&#x003D;&#x2009;postmortem age; TBARS&#x2009;&#x003D;&#x2009;thiobarbituric acid reactive substances.</p></fn></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap></sec></sec><sec id="sec4"><title>Discussion</title><p>Historically, numerous groups have studied BIA to predict or indicate various quality attributes in beef and other species, including pork, poultry, and fish (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r27">Marchello and Slanger, 1994</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r28">Marchello et&#x00A0;al., 1999</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r10">Cox et&#x00A0;al., 2011</xref>). In addition, few studies have evaluated meat freshness as means to predict the shelf life of meat using electrical properties (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r35">Sujiwo et&#x00A0;al., 2019</xref>). In an attempt to measure freshness of <italic>longissimus lumborum</italic> steaks, Sujiwo et&#x00A0;al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r35">2019</xref>) used a torrymeter tool to measure the dielectrical properties of fresh meat and reported a decrease of torrymeter values on aerobically packaged <italic>longissimus lumborum</italic> steaks during an 18-d retail display. The torrymeter had an integrated system that utilizes a band pass filter at a wide range of frequencies. As a result, this provides a greater chance to detect the correct frequency at each sampling time. On the other hand, the CQR equipment used in this study utilizes a single frequency (50 Hz), thus limiting its potential to assess the freshness of beef.</p><p>The PM effect of electrical impedance on <italic>longissimus lumborum</italic> steaks was also evaluated. When the PM time increased, S-BIA values decreased during retail display in the current study. Steaks from loins with a longer PM aging time had lower S-BIA values during retail display compared with those steaks from loins with shorter aging time. These results are consistent with those from Byrne et&#x00A0;al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r5">2000</xref>). They measured the internal impedance in muscle, and their results indicated that as PM aging increased, I-BIA values decreased in vacuum-packaged <italic>longissimus dorsi</italic> muscle. The commercial application for measuring internal impedance may pose a food safety concern because there is a risk of translocating bacteria into the meat, compromising the internal condition of the product. In a previous study, it was demonstrated that impedance and conductivity are good indicators of membrane integrity in pork (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r21">Kleibel et&#x00A0;al., 1983</xref>). These results follow the pattern of other studies indicating a change in BIA values of meat during PM aging. Recently, Chao et&#x00A0;al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r8">2020</xref>) reported an increase in pork membrane degradation after PM aging. This may help explain why higher BIA values are associated with increased PM aging. Additionally, dorsal (top) and ventral (bottom) portions of the steak had greater BIA values (data not shown) compared with the middle portion. Results previously reported by Goihl et&#x00A0;al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r16">1992</xref>) have demonstrated the presence of a fat and moisture gradient difference between dorsal and ventral locations in fresh <italic>longissimus lumborum</italic> steaks which is likely to influence the impedance measurements. Time in display case affected S-BIA values. Regardless of PM aging times, from day 0 through day 9, a linear increase of the impedance measurement was observed. After day 9, S-BIA values had more variation and were inconsistent. As meat ages, there is an increase in proteolysis (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r19">Huff-Lonergan and Lonergan, 2005</xref>), resulting in poor water-holding capacity and possibly affecting BIA values.</p><p>Color is the most important quality attribute for consumers as it influences their purchasing decisions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r26">Mancini and Hunt, 2005</xref>). It has been well established that increased PM aging time decreased color stability (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r36">Tang et&#x00A0;al., 2005</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r25">Lindahl, 2011</xref>). Research has reported that aerobically packaged <italic>longissimus dorsi</italic> steaks&#x2019; color stability was negatively affected when PM aging time increased (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r25">Lindahl, 2011</xref>). In the current study, an initial increase in <italic>L&#x002A;</italic> was observed for steaks aged 27 d compared with steaks aged 34 and 37 d. These results are in contrast with those from Dietz (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r11">2014</xref>), as he found that <italic>gluteus medius</italic> steaks with increased PM aging time had higher initial <italic>L&#x002A;</italic> compared with steaks with shorter PM aging time. Steaks aged 27 d were more red and yellow and had greater chroma values than steaks from loins aged 34 and 37 d. Our data on surface redness, yellowness, and chroma follow other reported literature (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r9">Colle et&#x00A0;al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r13">English et&#x00A0;al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r1">Abraham et&#x00A0;al., 2017</xref>), which indicated that displaying steaks from loins with increased PM aging may lead to a faster red and yellow color loss. This study showed no differences among all PM aging times for hue angle values. However, Ramanathan et&#x00A0;al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r32">2019</xref>) found that steaks from beef strip loins with less PM aging time had lower hue angle values. As expected, a decrease in surface oxymyoglobin and a simultaneous increase in metmyoglobin percentage was observed as display time increased. Phelps et&#x00A0;al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r31">2016</xref>) reported similar results in <italic>longissimus lumborum</italic> steaks during a 7-d retail display.</p><p>Consumers often misunderstand meat discoloration and conclude that the product has reached the end of its usable shelf life. However, color shelf life and bacterial shelf life of meat are not always following one another, as changes in fresh meat color during retail display is a natural process and does not mean that a product is spoiled (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r38">USDA-FSIS, 2013</xref>). Spoilage in meat occurs when organoleptic properties are lost and bacterial degradation of amino acids triggers slime formation and off-flavor development on the meat surface (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r15">Gill, 1997</xref>). The spoilage process is undergone when bacteria growth exceeds 10<sup>7</sup> log CFU/cm<sup>2</sup> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r20">Ingram and Simonsen, 1980</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r14">Gill, 1982</xref>). Overall, APC populations were relatively lower in steaks from loins aged 27 d&#x2014;which ranged from 2.39 to 6.35 log CFU/cm<sup>2</sup> throughout the retail display&#x2014;than their counterparts aged 34 and 37 d. Following the aforementioned recommendations, steaks aged 27 and 34 d had a shelf life of 15 d, respectively, and steaks aged 37 d had 12 d of shelf life under the conditions used in this study.</p><p>At the end of the 15 d of display, steaks achieved a TBARS value of 0.79 mg MDA/kg. Similar results were found in <italic>longissimus thoracis</italic> steaks, in which TBARS reached 0.86 mg MDA/kg at the end of 18-d retail display (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r35">Sujiwo et&#x00A0;al., 2019</xref>). A consumer panel determined that 2.0 mg MDA/kg was sufficient to detect oxidation in beef (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r17">Greene and Cumuze, 1981</xref>). After day 9 of display, TBARS values were equal to or greater than 0.6 mg MDA/kg, indicating that these steaks had higher lipid oxidation but were nonetheless below the oxidation detection threshold.</p><p>It has been determined that impedance values may change due to proteolysis when the membrane of muscle tissue is affected during post-rigor (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r33">Reichert, 1996</xref>). The highest correlation was shown between BIA and <italic>a&#x002A;</italic>, TBARS, and APC, which were negatively correlated for all PM aging times, reflecting an increase in BIA and a decrease in these quality attributes.</p><p>Sujiwo et&#x00A0;al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r35">2019</xref>) conducted a retail display study using <italic>longissimus thoracis</italic> steaks and found similar results, in which APC, <italic>a&#x002A;</italic>, and <italic>b&#x002A;</italic> were highly correlated with torrymeter values. Torrymeter measures the phase angle with a wide range of frequencies. Sujiwo et&#x00A0;al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r35">2019</xref>) used steaks with 24-h-PM aging time, providing the opportunity for protein degradation to occur; therefore, a more consistent decrease was observed. Overall, these results indicate that BIA may be considered as a tool to assess correlations with freshness quality attributes, including redness, APC, and TBARS in beef during retail display. Additionally, the measurement of pH has historically been used to evaluate the freshness of carcass and meat quality (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r22">Korkeala et&#x00A0;al., 1986</xref>). Although weak correlations were found between pH and BIA in this study, other literature has previously reported a moderate to high correlation (<italic>r</italic>&#x2009;&#x003D;&#x2009;0.91) between these 2 measurements (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r35">Sujiwo et&#x00A0;al., 2019</xref>). In this study, pH variation is so little that it is not surprising that no correlation was found.</p></sec><sec id="sec5"><title>Conclusions</title><p>Overall, I-BIA and S-BIA values increased on aerobically packaged <italic>longissimus lumborum</italic> steaks and were correlated with various quality parameters, including redness, yellowness, APC, and TBARS. However, the needles used in the I-BIA method are invasive and may translocate bacteria into the muscle; therefore, the use of the S-BIA method is recommended. Regardless of BIA method, lower BIA values serve as a tool to identify steaks from the <italic>longissimus lumborum</italic> that have undergone at least 34 d of PM aging. Further research should be conducted to study the effect of S-BIA on protein degradation of structural proteins.</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>Literature Cited</title><ref id="r1"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Abraham</surname>, <given-names>A.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>J. W.</given-names> <surname>Dillwith</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>G. G.</given-names> <surname>Mafi</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>D. L.</given-names> <surname>VanOverbeke</surname></string-name>, and <string-name><given-names>R.</given-names> <surname>Ramanathan</surname></string-name></person-group>. <year>2017</year>. <article-title>Metabolite profile differences between beef longissimus and psoas muscles during display</article-title>. <source>Meat Muscle Biol.</source> <volume>1</volume>:<fpage>18</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>27</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.22175/mmb2016.12.0007</pub-id>.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="r2"><mixed-citation publication-type="book"><collab>American Meat Science Association</collab>. <year>2012</year>. <source>Meat color measurement guidelines.</source> <publisher-name>Am. Meat Sci. Assoc.</publisher-name>, <publisher-loc>Champaign, IL</publisher-loc>.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="r3"><mixed-citation publication-type="book"><collab>AOAC</collab>. <year>2003</year>. <source>Rapid determination of moisture and fat in meats by microwave and nuclear magnetic resonance analysis.</source> Official Method PVM-1 MEAT. <publisher-name>AOAC</publisher-name>, <publisher-loc>Arlington, VA</publisher-loc>.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="r4"><mixed-citation publication-type="web"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Buzby</surname>, <given-names>J. C.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>H. F.</given-names> <surname>Wells</surname></string-name>, and <string-name><given-names>J.</given-names> <surname>Hyman</surname></string-name></person-group>. <year>2014</year>. <article-title>The estimated amount, value and calories of postharvest food losses at the retail and consumer levels in the United States</article-title>. USDA-ERS Economic Information Bulletin Number 121. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2501659</pub-id>.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="r5"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Byrne</surname>, <given-names>C. E.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>D. J.</given-names> <surname>Troy</surname></string-name>, and <string-name><given-names>D. J.</given-names> <surname>Buckley</surname></string-name></person-group>. <year>2000</year>. <article-title>Postmortem changes in muscle electrical properties of bovine M. longissimus dorsi and their relationship to meat quality attributes and pH fall</article-title>. <source>Meat Sci.</source> <volume>54</volume>:<fpage>23</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>34</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1740(99)00055-8</pub-id>.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="r6"><mixed-citation publication-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Callow</surname>, <given-names>E. H.</given-names></string-name></person-group> <year>1936</year>. <source>The electrical resistance of muscular tissue and its relation to curing.</source> <publisher-name>Annual Report of Food Investigations Board</publisher-name>. <publisher-loc>London, HMSO</publisher-loc>. p.&#x00A0;<fpage>57</fpage>.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="r7"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Campo</surname>, <given-names>M. M.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>G. R.</given-names> <surname>Nute</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>S. I.</given-names> <surname>Hughes</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>M.</given-names> <surname>Enser</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>J. D.</given-names> <surname>Wood</surname></string-name>, and <string-name><given-names>R. I.</given-names> <surname>Richardson</surname></string-name></person-group>. <year>2006</year>. <article-title>Flavour perception of oxidation in beef</article-title>. <source>Meat Sci.</source> <volume>72</volume>:<fpage>303</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>311</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2005.07.015</pub-id>.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="r8"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Chao</surname>, <given-names>M. D.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>E. A.</given-names> <surname>Donaldson</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>W.</given-names> <surname>Wu</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>A. A.</given-names> <surname>Welter</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>T. G.</given-names> <surname>O&#x2019;Quinn</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>W. W.</given-names> <surname>Hsu</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>M. D.</given-names> <surname>Schulte</surname></string-name>, and <string-name><given-names>S. M.</given-names> <surname>Lonergan</surname></string-name></person-group>. <year>2020</year>. <article-title>Characterizing membrane phospholipid hydrolysis of pork loins throughout three aging periods</article-title>. <source>Meat Sci.</source> <volume>163</volume>:<fpage>108065</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2020.108065</pub-id>.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="r9"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Colle</surname>, <given-names>M. J.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>R. P.</given-names> <surname>Richard</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>K. M.</given-names> <surname>Killinger</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>J. C.</given-names> <surname>Bohlscheid</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>A. R.</given-names> <surname>Gray</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>W. I.</given-names> <surname>Loucks</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>R. N.</given-names> <surname>Day</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>A. S.</given-names> <surname>Cochran</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>J. A.</given-names> <surname>Nasados</surname></string-name>, and <string-name><given-names>M. E.</given-names> <surname>Doumit</surname></string-name></person-group>. <year>2015</year>. <article-title>Influence of extended aging on beef quality characteristics and sensory perception of steaks from the gluteus medius and longissimus lumborum</article-title>. <source>Meat Sci.</source> <volume>110</volume>:<fpage>32</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>39</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2015.06.013</pub-id>.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="r10"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Cox</surname>, <given-names>M.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>R.</given-names> <surname>Heintz</surname></string-name>, and <string-name><given-names>K.</given-names> <surname>Hartman</surname></string-name></person-group>. <year>2011</year>. <article-title>Measurements of resistance and reactance in fish with the use of bioelectrical impedance analysis: Sources of error</article-title>. <source>Fish. B.-NOAA.</source> <volume>109</volume>:<fpage>34</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>47</lpage>.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="r11"><mixed-citation publication-type="thesis"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Dietz</surname>, <given-names>G.</given-names></string-name></person-group> <year>2014</year>. <article-title>Color and flavor stability of beef gluteus medius as influenced by postmortem aging time and blade tenderization</article-title>. M.S. thesis, <institution>Kansas State University</institution>, <publisher-loc>Manhattan, KS</publisher-loc>. (<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://krex.k-state.edu/dspace/bitstream/handle/2097/17610/GarretDietz2014.pdf?sequence=3&#x0026;isAllowed=y">https://krex.k-state.edu/dspace/bitstream/handle/2097/17610/GarretDietz2014.pdf?sequence=3&#x0026;isAllowed=y</ext-link>).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="r12"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Djenane</surname>, <given-names>D.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>A.</given-names> <surname>S&#x00E1;nchez-Escalante</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>J. A.</given-names> <surname>Beltr&#x00E1;n</surname></string-name>, and <string-name><given-names>P.</given-names> <surname>Roncal&#x00E9;s</surname></string-name></person-group>. <year>2001</year>. <article-title>Extension of the retail display life of fresh beef packaged in modified atmosphere by varying lighting conditions</article-title>. <source>J. Food Sci.</source> <volume>66</volume>:<fpage>181</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>186</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.2001.tb15603.x</pub-id>.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="r13"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>English</surname>, <given-names>A. R.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>G. G.</given-names> <surname>Mafi</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>D. L.</given-names> <surname>VanOverbeke</surname></string-name>, and <string-name><given-names>R.</given-names> <surname>Ramanathan</surname></string-name></person-group>. <year>2016</year>. <article-title>Effects of extended aging and modified atmospheric packaging on beef top loin steak color</article-title>. <source>J. Anim. Sci.</source> <volume>94</volume>:<fpage>1727</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1737</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2015-0149</pub-id>.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="r14"><mixed-citation publication-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Gill</surname>, <given-names>C. O.</given-names></string-name></person-group> <year>1982</year>. <source>Microbial interaction with meats.</source> In: <person-group person-group-type="editor"><string-name><given-names>M. H.</given-names> <surname>Brown</surname></string-name></person-group>, editor, <publisher-name>Meat microbiology. Applied Science Publishers</publisher-name>, <publisher-loc>London and New York</publisher-loc>. p.&#x00A0;<fpage>225</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>264</lpage>.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="r15"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Gill</surname>, <given-names>C. O.</given-names></string-name></person-group> <year>1997</year>. <article-title>Assessment of the hygienic performances of an air-cooling process for lamb carcasses and a spray-cooling process for pig carcasses</article-title>. <source>Int. J. Food Microbiol.</source> <volume>38</volume>:<fpage>85</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>93</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1605(97)00087-1</pub-id>.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="r16"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Goihl</surname>, <given-names>D. M.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>K. B.</given-names> <surname>Harris</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>J. W.</given-names> <surname>Savell</surname></string-name>, and <string-name><given-names>H. R.</given-names> <surname>Cross</surname></string-name></person-group>. <year>1992</year>. <article-title>Location of fat migration during cooking of beef loin steaks with external fat still attached</article-title>. <source>J. Food Compos. Anal.</source> <volume>5</volume>:<fpage>246</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>251</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-1575(92)90043-J</pub-id>.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="r17"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Greene</surname>, <given-names>B. E.</given-names></string-name>, and <string-name><given-names>T. H.</given-names> <surname>Cumuze</surname></string-name></person-group>. <year>1981</year>. <article-title>Relationship between TBA numbers and inexperience panellists assessments of oxidized flavour in cooked beef</article-title>. <source>J. Food Sci.</source> <volume>47</volume>:<fpage>52</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>54</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1982.tb11025.x</pub-id>.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="r18"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Gustavsson</surname>, <given-names>J.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>C.</given-names> <surname>Cederberg</surname></string-name>, and <string-name><given-names>U.</given-names> <surname>Sonesson</surname></string-name></person-group>. <year>2011</year>. <source>Global food losses and food waste: Extent causes and prevention.</source> <publisher-name>Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) of the United Nations</publisher-name>. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://www.fao.org/3/a-i2697e.pdf">http://www.fao.org/3/a-i2697e.pdf</ext-link>. (Accessed 12 February 2020).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="r19"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Huff-Lonergan</surname>, <given-names>E.</given-names></string-name>, and <string-name><given-names>S. M.</given-names> <surname>Lonergan</surname></string-name></person-group>. <year>2005</year>. <article-title>Mechanisms of water-holding capacity of meat: The role of postmortem biochemical and structural changes</article-title>. <source>Meat Sci.</source> <volume>71</volume>:<fpage>194</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>204</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2005.04.022</pub-id>.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="r20"><mixed-citation publication-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Ingram</surname>, <given-names>M.</given-names></string-name>, and <string-name><given-names>B.</given-names> <surname>Simonsen</surname></string-name></person-group>. <year>1980</year>. <source>Meat and meat products. In: Intl. Commission on the Microbiological Specifications for Foods (ICMSF),</source> editor, Microorganisms in foods 3: Microbial ecology of foods. <publisher-name>Academic Press</publisher-name>, <publisher-loc>New York, NY</publisher-loc>. p <fpage>333</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>409</lpage>.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="r21"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Kleibel</surname>, <given-names>A.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>H.</given-names> <surname>Pfzner</surname></string-name>, and <string-name><given-names>E.</given-names> <surname>Krause</surname></string-name></person-group>. <year>1983</year>. <article-title>Measurement of dielectric loss factor a routine method of recognizing PSE muscle</article-title>. <source>Fleischwirtsch.</source> <volume>63</volume>:<fpage>1183</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1185</lpage>.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="r22"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Korkeala</surname>, <given-names>H.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>O.</given-names> <surname>M&#x00E4;ki-Pet&#x00E4;ys</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>T.</given-names> <surname>Alanko</surname></string-name>, and <string-name><given-names>O.</given-names> <surname>Sorvettula</surname></string-name></person-group>. <year>1986</year>. <article-title>Determination of pH in meat</article-title>. <source>J. Meat Sci.</source> <volume>18</volume>:<fpage>121</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>132</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1016/0309-1740(86)90088-4</pub-id>.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="r23"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Krzywicki</surname>, <given-names>K.</given-names></string-name></person-group> <year>1979</year>. <article-title>Assessment of relative content of myoglobin, oxymyoglobin, and metmyoglobin at the surface of beef</article-title>. <source>Meat Sci.</source> <volume>3</volume>:<fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>10</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1016/0309-1740(79)90019-6</pub-id>.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="r24"><mixed-citation publication-type="book"><collab>Leco Corporation</collab>. <year>2011</year>. <source>Nitrogen/protein in meat products.</source> <publisher-name>Leco Corporation</publisher-name>, <publisher-loc>Saint Joseph, MI</publisher-loc>. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://www.leco.co.za/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/TRUMAC_NITROGEN-PROTEIN_MEAT_PRODUCTS_203-821-391.pdf">http://www.leco.co.za/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/TRUMAC_NITROGEN-PROTEIN_MEAT_PRODUCTS_203-821-391.pdf</ext-link>. (Accessed 30 December 2020).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="r25"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Lindahl</surname>, <given-names>G.</given-names></string-name></person-group> <year>2011</year>. <article-title>Colour stability of steaks from large beef cuts aged under vacuum or high oxygen modified atmosphere</article-title>. <source>Meat Sci.</source> <volume>87</volume>:<fpage>428</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>435</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2010.10.023</pub-id>.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="r26"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Mancini</surname>, <given-names>R. A.</given-names></string-name>, and <string-name><given-names>M.</given-names> <surname>Hunt</surname></string-name></person-group>. <year>2005</year>. <article-title>Current research in meat color</article-title>. <source>Meat Sci.</source> <volume>71</volume>:<fpage>100</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>121</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2005.03.003</pub-id>.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="r27"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Marchello</surname>, <given-names>M. J.</given-names></string-name>, and <string-name><given-names>W. D.</given-names> <surname>Slanger</surname></string-name></person-group>. <year>1994</year>. <article-title>Bioelectrical impedance can predict skeletal muscle and fat-free skeletal muscle of beef cows and their carcasses</article-title>. <source>J. Anim. Sci.</source> <volume>72</volume>:<fpage>3118</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>3130</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.2527/1994.72123118x</pub-id>.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="r28"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Marchello</surname>, <given-names>M. J.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>W. D.</given-names> <surname>Slanger</surname></string-name>, and <string-name><given-names>J. K.</given-names> <surname>Carlson</surname></string-name></person-group>. <year>1999</year>. <article-title>Bioelectrical impedance: Fat content of beef and pork from different size grinds</article-title>. <source>J. Anim. Sci.</source> <volume>77</volume>:<fpage>2464</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2468</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.2527/1999.7792464x</pub-id>.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="r29"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Morse</surname>, <given-names>F. H.</given-names></string-name></person-group> <year>1925</year>. <article-title>The electrical resistance and capacity of blood for frequencies between 800 Hz and 4.5 MHz</article-title>. <source>J. Gen. Physiol.</source> <volume>9</volume>:<fpage>153</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>167</lpage>.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="r30"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Phelps</surname>, <given-names>K. J.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>J. S.</given-names> <surname>Drouillard</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>J. S.</given-names> <surname>Jennings</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>B. E.</given-names> <surname>Depenbusch</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>C. L.</given-names> <surname>Van Bibber-Krueger</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>K. A.</given-names> <surname>Miller</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>M. A.</given-names> <surname>Vaughn</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>D. D.</given-names> <surname>Burnett</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>S. M.</given-names> <surname>Ebarb</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>T. A.</given-names> <surname>Houser</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>S. E.</given-names> <surname>Johnson</surname></string-name>, and <string-name><given-names>J. M.</given-names> <surname>Gonzalez</surname></string-name></person-group>. <year>2014</year>. <article-title>Effects of the Programmed Nutrition Beef Program on meat quality characteristics</article-title>. <source>J. Anim. Sci.</source> <volume>92</volume>:<fpage>1780</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1791</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2013-7231</pub-id>.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="r31"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Phelps</surname>, <given-names>K. J.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>J. S.</given-names> <surname>Drouillard</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>T. G.</given-names> <surname>O&#x2019;Quinn</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>D. D.</given-names> <surname>Burnett</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>T. L.</given-names> <surname>Blackmon</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>J. E.</given-names> <surname>Axman</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>C. L.</given-names> <surname>Van Bibber-Krueger</surname></string-name>, and <string-name><given-names>J. M.</given-names> <surname>Gonzalez</surname></string-name></person-group>. <year>2016</year>. <article-title>Feeding microalgae meal (All-G Rich<sup>&#x2122;</sup>; Schizochytrium limacinum CCAP 4087/2) to beef heifers. I: Effects on longissimus lumborum steak color and palatibility</article-title>. <source>J. Anim. Sci.</source> <volume>94</volume>:<fpage>4016</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>4029</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2016-0487</pub-id>.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="r32"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Ramanathan</surname>, <given-names>R.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>M. C.</given-names> <surname>Hunt</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>A. R.</given-names> <surname>English</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>G. G.</given-names> <surname>Mafi</surname></string-name>, and <string-name><given-names>D. L.</given-names> <surname>VanOverbeke</surname></string-name></person-group>. <year>2019</year>. <article-title>Effects of aging, modified atmospheric packaging, and display time on metmyoglobin reducing activity and oxygen consumption of high-pH beef</article-title>. <source>Meat Muscle Biol.</source> <volume>3</volume>(<issue>1</issue>). <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.22175/mmb2019.05.0017</pub-id>.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="r33"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Reichert</surname>, <given-names>J. E.</given-names></string-name></person-group> <year>1996</year>. <article-title>Possible methods of automatic on-line determination of quality parameters when classifying and selecting carcasses and meat cuts</article-title>. <source>Fleischwirtschaft.</source> <volume>76</volume>:<fpage>924</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>928</lpage>.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="r34"><mixed-citation publication-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Smith</surname>, <given-names>G. C.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>K. E.</given-names> <surname>Belk</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>J. N.</given-names> <surname>Sofos</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>J. D.</given-names> <surname>Tatum</surname></string-name>, and <string-name><given-names>S. N.</given-names> <surname>Williams</surname></string-name></person-group>. <year>2000</year>. <article-title>Antioxidants in muscle foods: Nutritional strategies to improve quality</article-title>. In: <person-group person-group-type="editor"><string-name><given-names>E.</given-names> <surname>Decker</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>C.</given-names> <surname>Faustman</surname></string-name>, and <string-name><given-names>C. J.</given-names> <surname>Lopez-</surname></string-name></person-group>Bote, editors, <source>Economic implications of improved color stability in beef.</source> <publisher-name>Wiley</publisher-name>, <publisher-loc>New York, NY</publisher-loc>. p.&#x00A0;<fpage>397</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>426</lpage>.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="r35"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Sujiwo</surname>, <given-names>J.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>H. J.</given-names> <surname>Kim</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>S. O.</given-names> <surname>Song</surname></string-name>, and <string-name><given-names>A.</given-names> <surname>Jang</surname></string-name></person-group>. <year>2019</year>. <article-title>Relationship between quality and freshness traits and torrymeter value of beef loin during cold storage</article-title>. <source>J. Meat Sci.</source> <volume>149</volume>:<fpage>120</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>125</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2018.11.017</pub-id>.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="r36"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Tang</surname>, <given-names>J.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>C.</given-names> <surname>Faustman</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>T. A.</given-names> <surname>Hoagland</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>R. A.</given-names> <surname>Mancini</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>M.</given-names> <surname>Seyfert</surname></string-name>, and <string-name><given-names>M. C.</given-names> <surname>Hunt</surname></string-name></person-group>. <year>2005</year>. <article-title>Postmortem oxygen consumption by mitochondria and its effects on myoglobin form and stability</article-title>. <source>J. Agr. Food Chem.</source> <volume>53</volume>:<fpage>1223</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1230</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1021/jf048646o</pub-id>.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="r37"><mixed-citation publication-type="web"><collab>USDA Agricultural Marketing Service</collab>. <year>2014</year>. <article-title>Institutional meat purchase specifications, fresh beef series 100</article-title>. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.ams.usda.gov/sites/default/files/media/IMPS_400_Fresh_Pork%5B1%5D.pdf">https://www.ams.usda.gov/sites/default/files/media/IMPS_400_Fresh_Pork%5B1%5D.pdf</ext-link>. (Accessed 10 January 2020).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="r38"><mixed-citation publication-type="web"><collab>USDA-FSIS</collab>. <year>2013</year>. <article-title>The color of meat and poultry. USDA Food Safety and Inspection Service</article-title>. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.fsis.usda.gov/wps/portal/fsis/topics/food-safety-education/get-answers/food-safety-fact-sheets/meat-preparation/the-color-of-meat-and-poultry/the-color-of-meat-and-poultry/ct_index">https://www.fsis.usda.gov/wps/portal/fsis/topics/food-safety-education/get-answers/food-safety-fact-sheets/meat-preparation/the-color-of-meat-and-poultry/the-color-of-meat-and-poultry/ct_index</ext-link>. (Accessed 18 March 2020).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="r39"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Witte</surname>, <given-names>V. C.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>G. F.</given-names> <surname>Krause</surname></string-name>, and <string-name><given-names>M. E.</given-names> <surname>Bailey</surname></string-name></person-group>. <year>1970</year>. <article-title>A new extraction method for determining 2-thiobarbituric acid values of pork and beef during storage</article-title>. <source>J. Food Sci.</source> <volume>35</volume>:<fpage>582</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>585</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1970.tb04815.x</pub-id>.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="r40"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Zollinger</surname>, <given-names>B. L.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>R. L.</given-names> <surname>Farrow</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>T. E.</given-names> <surname>Lawrence</surname></string-name>, and <string-name><given-names>N. S.</given-names> <surname>Latman</surname></string-name></person-group>. <year>2010</year>. <article-title>Prediction of beef carcass salable yield and trimmable fat using bioelectrical impedance analysis</article-title>. <source>J. Meat Sci.</source> <volume>84</volume>:<fpage>449</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>454</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2009.09.015</pub-id>.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>