<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd"><article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="2.3" xml:lang="EN" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="hwp">mmb</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">mmb</journal-id><journal-title>Meat and Muscle Biology</journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="full">MMB</abbrev-journal-title><issn pub-type="epub">2575-985X</issn><publisher><publisher-name>American Meat Science Association</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">127</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>2019 Reciprocal Meat Conference&#x2013; Meat and Poultry Quality and Composition-Measurement and Prediction</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Fatty Acid Composition of New Zealand Forage Finished Beef Compared to US Grain Fed Beef</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name><surname>Milopoulos</surname><given-names>J. T.</given-names></name><aff><label>1</label>Animal and Food Science, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX, USA</aff></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Garmyn</surname><given-names>A. J.</given-names></name><aff><label>1</label>Animal and Food Science, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX, USA</aff></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Miller</surname><given-names>M. F.</given-names></name><aff><label>1</label>Animal and Food Science, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX, USA</aff></contrib></contrib-group><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">&#x2a;Corresponding author. Email: <email>jillian.milopoulos@ttu.edu</email> (J. T. Milopoulos)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="ppub"><month>12</month><year>2019</year></pub-date><volume>3</volume><issue>2</issue><fpage>127</fpage><lpage>127</lpage><permissions><copyright-year>2019</copyright-year><copyright-holder>American Meat Science Association</copyright-holder><license license-type="open-access"><p>This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC-ND license (<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/</ext-link>)</p></license></permissions><abstract><sec><title>Objectives</title><p>The objective of this study was to evaluate differences in fatty acid (FA) composition of NZ beef finished on fodder beet (Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris L.; FB) or traditional grass diets and US grain-finished beef.</p></sec><sec><title>Materials and Methods</title><p>Strip loins (<italic>n</italic> &#x3d; 240) were selected from a commercial abattoir in NZ representing two feeding treatments (FB, non-FB) and expected low and high eating quality (primarily based on marbling) following a nationwide feeding trial to finish beef steers using FB. Selection resulted in four treatments: FB low quality (FBL), FB high quality (FBH), non-FB low quality (NFBL), and non-FB high quality (NFBH). Additionally, sides of beef (<italic>n</italic> &#x3d; 120) representing USDA Top Choice (TCH) and Select (SEL) were sourced from a commercial abattoir in the US. Loins were fabricated prior to 21 d postmortem to isolate the longissimus lumborum (LL); these were sliced into 2.5 cm steaks, vacuum packaged, and stored at 2&#x2013;4&#xb0;C until 21 d or 35 d postmortem and frozen on the appropriate day. Lipids were extracted from a subset of samples via chloroform: methanol extraction then separated into polar and neutral fractions. Fatty acid methyl esters were evaluated using GC-FID. Data were analyzed with a 2-way ANOVA at a significance level of &#x3b1; &#x3d; 0.05 and treatment, aging, and the respective interaction as fixed effects.</p></sec><sec><title>Results</title><p>Aging influenced percent saturated FA (%SFA; <italic>P</italic> &#x3c; 0.01), monounsaturated FA (%MUFA; <italic>P</italic> &#x3c; 0.01), and polyunsaturated FA (%PUFA; <italic>P</italic> &#x3d; 0.01). An increase in %MUFA and %PUFA at 35 d compared with 21 d (<italic>P</italic> &#x3c; 0.01) corresponded with a decrease in %SFA at 35 d (<italic>P</italic> &#x3c; 0.01). Treatment also influenced %PUFA (<italic>P</italic> &#x3c; 0.01). NFBL contained the greatest %PUFA (<italic>P</italic> &#x3c; 0.05). TCH and FBH contained less %PUFA than all treatments except SEL (<italic>P</italic> &#x3e; 0.05). Treatment and aging also affected palmitic and stearic acids (<italic>P</italic> &#x3c; 0.01), which make up the greatest portion of SFA. The proportion of palmitic acid was least in SEL (<italic>P</italic> &#x3c; 0.05) and greater in FBH than NFBH and TC (<italic>P</italic> &#x3c; 0.05). The US treatments had lower proportions of stearic acid than NZ treatments (<italic>P</italic> &#x3c; 0.05). Both palmitic and stearic acids were of greater proportions in 35 d samples than 21 d samples (<italic>P</italic> &#x3c; 0.05). Oleic acid contributes largely to total FA and was affected by the interaction of treatment and aging (<italic>P</italic> &#x3d; 0.04). At 35 d, NZ treatments had greater proportions of oleic acid than at 21 d (<italic>P</italic> &#x3c; 0.05). The proportion of oleic acid was least in SEL at both aging times. Of the PUFA, linoleic was affected by treatment (<italic>P</italic> &#x3c; 0.05) and was greatest in SEL and TC (<italic>P</italic> &#x3c; 0.05); FB treatments had the lowest proportion of linoleic acid (<italic>P</italic> &#x3c; 0.05). Treatment and aging affected &#x3b1;-linolenic acid (<italic>P</italic> &#x3c; 0.01). NFBL and NFBH had a greater proportion than both FB and US treatments (<italic>P</italic> &#x3c; 0.05); both FB treatments had greater proportions of &#x3b1;-linolenic than US treatments (<italic>P</italic> &#x3c; 0.05). Proportion of &#x3b1;-linolenic acid was elevated with 35 d aging (<italic>P</italic> &#x3c; 0.05). Treatment affected proportions of long chain PUFA (<italic>P</italic> &#x3c; 0.05) with TCH and SEL having lower proportions than NZ treatments (<italic>P</italic> &#x3c; 0.05). Low quality NZ treatments had the greatest proportions of long chain PUFA (<italic>P</italic> &#x3c; 0.05).</p></sec><sec><title>Conclusion</title><p>While finishing diet does affect fatty acid composition of beef strip steaks, finishing on FB produces a similar FA composition to non-FB grass. Total lipid content is also responsible for variation in FA composition. As lipids oxidize during aging, a shift toward more unsaturated FA occurs, leading to a decrease in %SFA.</p></sec></abstract><kwd-group><title>Keywords: </title><kwd>fatty acid</kwd><kwd>feeding</kwd><kwd>fodder beet</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front></article>
