<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd"><article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="2.3" xml:lang="EN" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="hwp">mmb</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">mmb</journal-id><journal-title>Meat and Muscle Biology</journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="full">MMB</abbrev-journal-title><issn pub-type="epub">2575-985X</issn><publisher><publisher-name>American Meat Science Association</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">88</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>2019 Reciprocal Meat Conference &#x2013; Meat and Poultry Quality</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Effects of Extended Aging on the Flavor Characteristics of Grass and Grain Fed Australian Beef <italic>Longissimus Thoracis</italic></article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name><surname>Musa</surname><given-names>O. E.</given-names></name><aff><label>1</label>Animal and Food Science, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX, USA</aff></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Garmyn</surname><given-names>A. J.</given-names></name><aff><label>1</label>Animal and Food Science, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX, USA</aff></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Legako</surname><given-names>J. F.</given-names></name><aff><label>1</label>Animal and Food Science, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX, USA</aff></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Woerner</surname><given-names>D. R.</given-names></name><aff><label>1</label>Animal and Food Science, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX, USA</aff></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Miller</surname><given-names>M. F.</given-names></name><aff><label>1</label>Animal and Food Science, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX, USA</aff></contrib></contrib-group><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">&#x2a;Corresponding author. Email: <email>osigbemeh-ebitimi.musa@ttu.edu</email> (O. E. Musa)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub-ppub"><month>12</month><year>2019</year></pub-date><volume>3</volume><issue>2</issue><fpage>88</fpage><lpage>88</lpage><permissions><copyright-year>2019</copyright-year><copyright-holder>American Meat Science Association</copyright-holder><license license-type="open-access"><p>This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC-ND license (<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/</ext-link>)</p></license></permissions><abstract><sec><title>Objectives</title><p>The objective of this study was to investigate the effects of extended wet ageing on the flavor characteristics, of grass and grain fed Australian beef lumborum thoracis.</p></sec><sec><title>Materials and Methods</title><p>Cube rolls (HAM &#x23;2244) were collected from grass and grain fed cattle (<italic>n</italic> &#x3d; 30) at a commercial abattoir near Brisbane, Australia. Cube rolls were vacuum packaged and shipped under refrigeration (0&#x2013;2&#xb0;C) to Texas Tech University. Each cube roll was cut into 2.5-cm steaks and labeled according to position from posterior to anterior end. Steaks were vacuumed packaged, stored through the appropriate postmortem ageing period (35, 45, 55, or 65 d postmortem), and then frozen until further analysis. One steak from each cube roll was used for trained descriptive flavor analysis with 8 trained panelists comprised of mostly graduate students from Texas Tech University. Flavor attributes of cooked steaks were scored using 100-point anchored line scales (0 &#x3d; none, 50 &#x3d; moderate, and 100 &#x3d; strong).</p><p>Data were analyzed used PROC GLIMMIX of SAS with diet, postmortem ageing, and their interaction as fixed effects and panelist as a random effect. Final temperature was tested as a covariate for all the flavor attributes.</p></sec><sec><title>Results</title><p>An interaction was detected only for the bitter flavor and overall juiciness (P &#x2264; 0.03). Beef flavor ID, fat-like, metallic, umami, and sweet were not influenced by diet or postmortem ageing (<italic>P</italic> &#x3e; 0.05). Ageing influenced bloody serumy flavor (<italic>P</italic> &#x3e; 0.05) with 45 d samples having greater flavor than 55 d samples, but not differing (<italic>P</italic> &#x3e; 0.05) from any other ageing period. Diet and ageing influenced rancid flavor (<italic>P</italic> &#x3e; 0.05), with grass fed samples having a stronger rancid flavor than grain fed samples. Samples aged 65 d had a stronger rancid flavor than 45 or 55-d samples, and 35-d samples had the lowest rancid flavor. Diet and ageing influenced grassy flavor (<italic>P</italic> &#x3e; 0.05), again being stronger in grass than grain fed samples. Samples aged 35 d had a weaker (<italic>P</italic> &#x3e; 0.05) grassy flavor than any other ageing period, which did not differ (<italic>P</italic> &#x3e; 0.05). Diet and ageing had an effect on liver-like flavor (<italic>P</italic> &#x3c; 0.05) with stronger flavors in grain than grass fed samples and liver-like flavor increasing with postmortem ageing time. Sour flavor was affected by diet only (<italic>P</italic> &#x3c; 0.05) with grass fed samples having stronger sour flavor than grain fed samples. Ageing had an effect on overall tenderness (<italic>P</italic> &#x3c; 0.05); samples aged 35 d were least tender, and samples aged 45 d were more tender than 55 d samples but did not differ from 65 d samples.</p></sec><sec><title>Conclusion</title><p>The results suggest that beef flavor as measured by beef flavor ID and umami were not impacted by extended ageing; however, some off-flavors grew stronger as ageing time extended. Flavor attributes such as rancid, grassy, sour were stronger in grass than grain fed samples, but grain fed has a stronger liver-like flavor. Ageing influenced both overall tenderness and juiciness, but typically not in a linear fashion.</p></sec></abstract><kwd-group><title>Keywords: </title><kwd>aging</kwd><kwd>beef</kwd><kwd>diet</kwd><kwd>flavor</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front></article>
