<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd"><article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="2.3" xml:lang="EN" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="hwp">mmb</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">mmb</journal-id><journal-title>Meat and Muscle Biology</journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="full">MMB</abbrev-journal-title><issn pub-type="epub">2575-985X</issn><publisher><publisher-name>American Meat Science Association</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">82</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>2019 Reciprocal Meat Conference &#x2013; Meat and Poultry Quality</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Sensory Descriptive Attributes of Grass and Grain-Fed Australian Beef <italic>Longissimus Lumborum</italic> after Extended Wet-Aging Periods</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name><surname>Evers</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name><aff><label>1</label>Animal &#x26; Food Sciences, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX, USA</aff></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Garmyn</surname><given-names>A. J.</given-names></name><aff><label>1</label>Animal &#x26; Food Sciences, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX, USA</aff></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Legako</surname><given-names>J. F.</given-names></name><aff><label>1</label>Animal &#x26; Food Sciences, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX, USA</aff></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Woerner</surname><given-names>D. R.</given-names></name><aff><label>1</label>Animal &#x26; Food Sciences, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX, USA</aff></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Miller</surname><given-names>M. F.</given-names></name><aff><label>1</label>Animal &#x26; Food Sciences, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX, USA</aff></contrib></contrib-group><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">&#x2a;Corresponding author. Email: <email>danielle.evers@ttu.edu</email> (D. Evers)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub-ppub"><month>12</month><year>2019</year></pub-date><volume>3</volume><issue>2</issue><fpage>82</fpage><lpage>82</lpage><permissions><copyright-year>2019</copyright-year><copyright-holder>American Meat Science Association</copyright-holder><license license-type="open-access"><p>This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC-ND license (<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/</ext-link>)</p></license></permissions><abstract><sec><title>Objectives</title><p>The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of extended wet-aging on the beef flavor profile of grass and grain-fed Australian strip loins.</p></sec><sec><title>Materials and Methods</title><p>Strip loins (HAM 2140) were collected from grass and grain finished cattle (<italic>n</italic> &#x3d; 50) at a commercial abattoir near Brisbane, Australia. Subprimals were portioned into sections and assigned randomly to 1 of 3 postmortem aging periods (45, 70, or 135 d). Portions were individually vacuum packaged and shipped refrigerated (0&#x2013;4&#xb0;C) to Texas Tech University in Lubbock, TX. Upon arrival, the strip loin sections were sorted into respective aging groups of 45D, 70D, and 135D and stored at 1&#x2013;2&#xb0;C. On each respective day, sections were fabricated into 2.54-cm steaks, vacuum packaged and frozen (&#x2013;21&#xb0;C). Electric clamshell grills were used to cook thawed (held at 2&#x2013;4&#xb0;C for 24 h) steaks to a medium degree of doneness (71&#xb0;C); cooked temperatures were recorded. Steaks were cut into cubes and evaluated by trained panelists (<italic>n</italic> &#x3d; 6) for descriptive sensory attributes using a 100-mm anchored line scales (0 &#x3d; slight, 50 &#x3d; moderate and 100 &#x3d; strong).</p></sec><sec><title>Results</title><p>The sour flavor was the only trait where an interaction between diet and postmortem aging was detected (<italic>P</italic> &#x3c; 0.01<italic>).</italic> Samples aged 135 d from both grass and grain were similarly (<italic>P</italic> &#x3e; 0.05) scored with a stronger (<italic>P</italic> &#x3c; 0.05) sour flavor than all other treatment combinations, which did not differ (<italic>P</italic> &#x3e; 0.05). Aging impacted (<italic>P</italic> &#x2264; 0.01<italic>)</italic> beef flavor ID, liver-like, metallic, rancid, green-hay, umami, and bitter flavors, as well as overall juiciness and overall tenderness. For beef flavor ID, 45D aging resulted in the greatest intensity (<italic>P</italic> &#x3c; 0.05), while 70D samples were intermediate, and 135D samples were the least intense. For liver-like, metallic, rancid, green-hay, and bitter flavors, 135D samples had the strongest flavor, while 70D samples were intermediate, and 45D samples had the weakest flavor intensity (<italic>P</italic> &#x3c; 0.05). For umami, 45D samples had stronger (<italic>P</italic> &#x3c; 0.05) umami flavor than 135D samples, but 70D samples did not differ from either 45D or 135D (<italic>P</italic> &#x3e; 0.05). Panelists rated 70D and 135D samples juicier (<italic>P</italic> &#x3c; 0.01) than 45D samples, but 70D and 135D did not differ (<italic>P</italic> &#x3e; 0.05). For overall tenderness, panelists rated 135D samples more tender (<italic>P</italic> &#x3c; 0.05) than 45D and 70D, which were similar (<italic>P</italic> &#x3e; 0.05). Diet impacted (<italic>P</italic> &#x3c; 0.05) bloody/serumy, liver-like, green-hay, and bitter flavors. For bloody/serumy and liver-like, the grain fed treatments resulted in greater (<italic>P</italic> &#x3c; 0.05) flavor intensity than grass fed treatments. However, grass fed samples had stronger (<italic>P</italic> &#x3c; 0.05) green-hay and bitter flavors compared to grain fed samples. Diet and aging had no effect (<italic>P</italic> &#x3e; 0.05) on fat-like or sweet flavors.</p></sec><sec><title>Conclusion</title><p>Extending postmortem aging of Australian beef strip loins from 45 to 135 d resulted in decreased beef and umami flavors, along with concurrent increased detection of off-flavors, such as liver-like, rancid, and sour. Diet influenced fewer flavor traits than postmortem aging, but grass-fed samples still had stronger green-hay flavor, as would be expected. Based on these results, aging beef strip loins 135 d is not recommended based on reduced beef flavor and increased off-flavor detection.</p></sec></abstract><kwd-group><title>Keywords: </title><kwd>beef</kwd><kwd>flavor</kwd><kwd>wet aging</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front></article>
